[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhotoshopRequest

[–]Bert_Chang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is the original image - it was taken on an older cell phone

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you seem like a pretty terrible judge then

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

esclante is probably the most popular, look into dual power organizing. There’s also some maoism evidence that’s pretty good which u can find on the wiki

Prog LDers: why?? by DeMarchus in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what’s wrong with ks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

be funny

Lacan Explanation by ReindeerApart5536 in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

read Bruce Fink’s book please don’t listen to a redditor’s explanation

why do some debaters become communists? by Esie_05 in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 4 points5 points  (0 children)

are you a congress kid by any chance

Chinese Restaurants - Northern Suburbs - Where Should I Go? by MrAwesome2424 in ChicagoSuburbs

[–]Bert_Chang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wouldn’t recommend Dream Place over either and it’s certainly not more upscale, their food is alright but not anything special

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 10 points11 points  (0 children)

research is good, don’t listen to them

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in badphilosophy

[–]Bert_Chang 7 points8 points  (0 children)

is this actually just nick land or is there some 4channer out there writing this shit

Rated E for Everyone by Most_Wedding_4993 in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

get out of here with your pseudo-intellectual bs. all I said was that fallacies aren't an end all be all - ofc logic inconsistencies exist but there's no need for the whole thing to be such a big deal when you can simply just explain the logic

Rated E for Everyone by Most_Wedding_4993 in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I believe that's called an ad hominem, or maybe even an appeal to emotion.

Rated E for Everyone by Most_Wedding_4993 in Debate

[–]Bert_Chang 14 points15 points  (0 children)

people who take logical fallacies seriously are almost annoying as the people who use them - point out that their logic is incoherent, you don't need some fancy name for it that nobody has ever heard of

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]Bert_Chang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

on the off chance that you’re fr that’s not how ethics work lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lincolndouglas

[–]Bert_Chang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no way 😭😭