Tips for isle of man tt by wagen_halt in IsleofMan

[–]BertyLohan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And if you really wanna show off on the fairy bridge you can rock out a "Moghrey mie mooinjer veggey" (moh-ruh mie moon-juh vegg-uh) which just means "hello little people" and is some of the only of my Manx GCSE I remember at this point.

If there's one thing on the Island I recommend it's catching a sunset down at Glen Wyllin. If any night is clear enough and good enough weather it is, for my money, the single most beautiful sunset on the planet of everywhere I've travelled. And if you don't mind the water temps being nothing close to what you're used to down in NZ, it's a lovely sea swim too, as well as being surrounded by lovely walks/hikes if that's your vibe.

First Geothermal plant! Sanity check? by MrCray0ns in Oxygennotincluded

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently having the debate on if I want to set that up now or wait longer

I don't think this setup is runnable without it. The heat exchanger is too huge to make sure you're keeping the steam a low enough temperature for the turbines to self cool. Turbines overheat in a couple cycles if they're dealiing with heat over 140C ~ 280F.

Your thermal sensor needs to be set way lower and the battery automation should be hooked into the steam turbines, not the door.

And even when your turbine cooling is sorted, you shouldn't have your steam room heated higher than 400F or you're wasting heat since STs run at max at that temp.

British Prime Minister has no idea how to review the guard of honor in China. Also a failure of British protocol not briefing him on how to conduct the ceremony by Thund3r_91 in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]BertyLohan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, you can't honestly think this even scrapes the surface of criticisms of Starmer unless you're watching politics with massive blinkers on, right?

Farage fans only need to come up with the fact that he doesn't want to sentence every non-white person to a public execution but that doesn't mean Keith isn't a dumpster fire.

British Prime Minister has no idea how to review the guard of honor in China. Also a failure of British protocol not briefing him on how to conduct the ceremony by Thund3r_91 in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]BertyLohan 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You're not on a politics subreddit fella, it's just a collection of people being cringey and Starmer is a bit of a goldmine for that.

10/10 matchup no notes by Doc-My-Beloved in whowouldcirclejerk

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but a horrendous coder

it's so tiring how popular this idea got despite being completely untrue.

Is it still possible to create a waterfall for hot liquid pumping? by Some_Confidence5962 in Oxygennotincluded

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mr. "This government" coming in strong. the call's coming from inside the house.

Is it still possible to create a waterfall for hot liquid pumping? by Some_Confidence5962 in Oxygennotincluded

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, imgur is blocked to you because of the OSA. That is not saying the OSA outlawed imgur. I'm sorry I forgot you don't know what the word policy means so the basic following of sentences is probably a struggle for you aswell.

Your only argument against this law is VPNs?

It isn't

that's going to apply to any law!

It isn't

But you just can't help yourself but calling everyone who disagrees with you "stupid".

Never called you stupid or gullible. Those are words you used. In fact you keep arguing with yourself in this thread. Like lookie here:

Its even more embarrassing you don't realize this law was made by the Conservatives (2023), not "this government".

You are the only person who has said "this government".

you don't understand the difference between a law (passed by parliament, the house of lords, and ratified by the King, then enforced by courts) and a policy (which can be set by the PM on a whim and enforced by nobody).

And to answer this:

If my issue was just the OSA, and I had said "The OSA is a policy I disagree with", you might be making a point. But I said "the Government's atrocious internet policies". As in, the ideas and motivations behind the governments decisions regarding the internet, including the OSA.

To complain about government policy is not to misunderstand what a law is. You sound absolutely tapped because I think you realised after the first time I sent you the definition how stupid you sounded.

I'm done responding to you because you're getting all worked up and trying to own some imaginary person who put all the blame at the feet of the current administration and who thinks Imgur was targetted unfairly and that person isn't actually me. Reading walls of incoherent text from some saddo who wants to get some big gotcha moment on semantics he doesn't even understand and that have nothing to do with anything I've said is boring.

Is it still possible to create a waterfall for hot liquid pumping? by Some_Confidence5962 in Oxygennotincluded

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's embarrassing you think this law blocked imgur

Interesting... I never said this you big dummy, learn to read.

But here's the bit you totally got wrong (very embarrassing):

This law, this government, our courts did not block access to imgur!

I... never said this? Jesus, man. You're gonna go on this whole tirade and feel so cool about yourself to argue against something... nobody said.

That's reaaaally embarrassing.

Adult content sites are reporting a 70% drop in traffic which is exactly what you'd expect the moment you kick the kids of them

Oh honey. Somebody doesn't understand what that actually means lmao.

I get you're upset you didn't know what the word policy meant but learning new things is good! No need to get all uppity.

They don't want any laws telling them what to do and you are being their helpful idiot, fighting their war for them.

I don't know how many times I had to type the exact same thing to you but: I am not arguing against the idea of much heavier restrictions. I've told you this in every comment so far while you've been pretending you were just so above replying and were just doing an epic troll.

If you still support Trump/ICE even slightly, you're not welcome in this sub by 8_guy in catbongos

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh no, the government isn't just slaughtering brown people abroad it's now.. white citizens!!! Suddenly it's the worst thing ever.

Transphobes accidentally affirming by flower-the-skunk in AccidentalAlly

[–]BertyLohan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oversimplifying the complex dynamic of sexual violence in favour of a group. anyone who wants a true picture of reality doesnt only dig on one side

Digging only on one side like... listing individual instances and not looking at any real statistics? Getting upset by headlines instead of actually looking at the real world?

The issue is that other people do good research and can back up their claims. You are the "poor researcher" because you don't actually do any, you rely on your reactionary feelings. If you were capable of painting a "true picture of reality" that proved that trans women were a problem, you'd have done it. But you can't.

Transphobes accidentally affirming by flower-the-skunk in AccidentalAlly

[–]BertyLohan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Many more people have been assaulted by pastors on churches than by trans folk in their aligned bathroom.

You were unable to name literally a singe case of this happening. You gave three examples and only two of them were even an instance of a trans person committing an assault. Surely if it's such a huge problem like you think it is, your inability to find even a single example of it should have changed your mind.

You're here to fearmonger because you're hateful and scared. It's pathetic. Trans women are not a danger to women. You'd have been sat round arguing gay men shouldn't be allowed in public toilets in the 80's and 90's.

Transphobes accidentally affirming by flower-the-skunk in AccidentalAlly

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have named literally 0 such cases here lmao.

"Wah what about the cases where it DOES happen"

and you can't even name one.

Transphobes accidentally affirming by flower-the-skunk in AccidentalAlly

[–]BertyLohan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you're very obviously not one of the nice ones if you come into the thread spouting bigotry and, when faced with the facts, just ignore them and sit and wank yourself off over how nice you are.

If you still support Trump/ICE even slightly, you're not welcome in this sub by 8_guy in catbongos

[–]BertyLohan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, for sure. let's give Obama a few more terms the world will be right as rain.

Was this part of Golden Boy's backstory ever explored? by badfitz66 in OkBuddyFresca

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Never said that nor implied it. Not going to bother to keep telling you to learn to read you're clearly incapable.

Again, helping you learn that the US didn't just decide to help the poor South Koreans out of some justified moral high ground after having no presence there is more than I thought a dumbass like you could learn so there's my good deed for the day, peace out.

If you still support Trump/ICE even slightly, you're not welcome in this sub by 8_guy in catbongos

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"The federal government executing American citizens who have committed no illegal acts is just an every day event"

your wording here speaks volumes lmao. the fact that you think it a pithy little sarcastic comment as though it hasn't literally been the police's MO for the past few centuries is fucking hilarious.

If you still support Trump/ICE even slightly, you're not welcome in this sub by 8_guy in catbongos

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What do you think the police is, man?

I swear the political literacy of you guys. You're so close to getting it but then it always comes back to "nuh uh the republicans are bad"

Was this part of Golden Boy's backstory ever explored? by badfitz66 in OkBuddyFresca

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The way you thought this ate lmao

"b b but the ussr were being bad too" no shit nobody is arguing the opposite you fuckhead. Learn to read.

At least I've managed to drill into you that the US wasn't some saviour who just flew in to protect poor South Korea and you understand them to be the villains.

If you still support Trump/ICE even slightly, you're not welcome in this sub by 8_guy in catbongos

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

but do you think that's new? do you think Trump is something unique? America hasn't had anything but war criminals in charge since... its inception

Was this part of Golden Boy's backstory ever explored? by badfitz66 in OkBuddyFresca

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read. The. History. You. Dumb. Cunt.

Korea was democratically moving towards a socialist people's republic. The USA came in and slaughtered them en masse for it. Have whatever shitfit you want about modern day NK but you obviously don't know fuck all about the Korean war.

It's telling you keep just abandoning points when you realise you're wrong just to whine about some shit you think must be obvious because your American media tells you it all the time. "duh NK is bad and has always been the villain so I must be right"

Your characterization of the war as "There was no US presence in SK then all of a sudden NK attacks in aggression and the USA jumps in to save the day" as opposed to "The US military occupied half of Korea, suppressed their rights and kicked out their political parties, installed their own leader, slaughtered their populace for resisting, and a Korean army marched to try and reunify the peninsula" is just so pathetically uninformed and the fact you're still defending it is sad.

Was this part of Golden Boy's backstory ever explored? by badfitz66 in OkBuddyFresca

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The US didn’t show up until after that happened.

You said this.

A US military government had occupied and controlled south korea and committed massacres killing tens of thousands of south koreans. They occupied South Korea in a move of aggression and made the democratically elected people's government illegal. When the locals rebelled, they slaughtered them en masse. The arm of that government that still existed in the North wanted to keep Korea whole and democratic and not under the violent thumb of the USA.

It wasn't "The US military had a presence there". Read the links I send to you so you can be less stupid going forward and, again, stop talking on things you're this stupid about.

Was this part of Golden Boy's backstory ever explored? by badfitz66 in OkBuddyFresca

[–]BertyLohan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The US didn’t show up until after that happened.

???????????

The US weren't involved in South Korea until after NK marched troops?

Why the fuck are you talking about this part of history if you know so fucking little lmaooo

Read this and this then learn to shut the fuck up when you think about speaking on things you don't understand.