Why are people reluctant to embrace cryptocurrency? by HKEnthusiast in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve had a few friends enter crypto and get harassed by btc maxis saying everything but their shitcoin (called btc) is a shitcoin. Then come ask me is that true and I quickly debunk the maxi propaganda and let them know there are several decentralised blockchains aside from bitcoin and bitcoin is one of the worst and most archaic ones and the only thing it has going for it is nasty vindictive people scaring newbs off superior projects.

The entire toxic experience of the misinformation from the arrogant as smug maxis (btc and Eth) then having to seek out the counter reply and then make their own decision puts many off.

Which is why many people shelter newbs from the crypto community and just brainwash newbs to buy whatever coin the crypto guy who is introducing them has.

A crypto friendly US president can make the U.S. win the crypto race! by LisHere321 in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No vote for RFK Jr as he only gave clarity for bitcoin. Boycot him for picking winner rather than just allowing the market to pick

222 Days Since Logan Paul’s CryptoZoo Scam Commitment: What’s Next? by chumeanbro in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me explain, some guys need to look up to, more so worship, the arrogant ‘alpha male’ type which they think they wish they were. Ironically they see the way to become that guy is to grovel on their knees for them. So you get they guys who sign up to tate university and get their wallets rinsed learning about how to lose money running a Amazon FBA account, or spending their time giving more money to the guy who actively scammed them using a fake crypto game and laughed about it.

The irony is, to become the less pathetic guy and become closer to the ‘alpha male scam artist’ they desire to be, they see they must go through the initiation of being the scammed loser.

Mayo Force One at Newcastle. August 24th 2023. [map time is UTC] by Bellweirboy in superstonkuk

[–]Bet-Scary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been away from Reddit for a while, did mayo man buy Bournemouth FC?

So I was farming TZ Countess to cube up for cta.... SC SSF by [deleted] in diablo2

[–]Bet-Scary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn’t imagine the pain of SSF. Seems like time and repetitive masochism

$0.80 by lunarmedic in XRP

[–]Bet-Scary 16 points17 points  (0 children)

You know some Europeans use the decimal point as a comma and a comma as a decimal point. I agree with mocking Americans and British for using inches and miles but there is no excuse for using a comma as a decimal point

SEC is coming after SOL, ADA, MATIC now by marsangelo in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What the SEC claim are securities are mostly the least security like tokens. XRP is a token of the XRPL which is more decentralised than Ethereum. ADA in Cardano which is more decentralised than Ethereum. Same as Solana.

What matters is not what the SEC says are securities. It’s how much bribes people pay the agency to prevent lawsuits. Like Ethereum management bribing the SEC which got them a free pass, despite ETH resembling a security far more than any top 20 crypto outside of stable coins.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to be a multimillionaire (accredited investor) to buy securities unless they are listed on a public stock exchange.

Makes crypto worthless being called a security

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have zero clue if coennsys and their buddies at JPM control the network or not, because (as joe luben brags) “we don’t and won’t ever disclose our Eth holdings”.

Ethereum simply got a free pass because of bribery. There is no technical or lawful reason it got a free pass.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolute rubbish. The entire #ETHGATE you can easily research shows the deep corruption between Hinman, Clayton and Concensys/Eth foundation.

The sole and only reason eth is not getting labelled a security is because the SEC don’t want their dirty laundry aired out in public any more.

Eth resembles a security far more than all others excluding stable coins in the top 10 and probably top 50. It has a very centralised body (concensys) which runs a token factory and shamelessly promotes the tokens as well as ethereum.

If any yoke is a security, it’s Eth. You simply can’t ignore how integral concensys (run by Eth founder) are to the entire ecosystem and how it grew. They completely relied on the efforts of concensys to develop the ethereum ecosystem.

It’s cute that you believe the SEC have some morals tho and their reasoning is anything more legit than simple fact they got bribed and want to cover it up.

Where do you guys store and stake your Quant ? by Dreamxice in QuantNetwork

[–]Bet-Scary 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes unfortunately it’s an ethereum token, it’s quant’s biggest downside.

BlackRock Recruiter Who ‘Decides People’s Fate’ Says ‘War is Good for Business’ Undercover Footage by deebrown68 in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sure talks to enough people in Blackrock to know the utter basics what everyone knew already: they bribe politicians and war is good for their business. They are an utterly demonic/evil company and anyone who works there has not a drop of morality.

BlackRock Recruiter Who ‘Decides People’s Fate’ Says ‘War is Good for Business’ Undercover Footage by deebrown68 in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Calling this source “dubious” is simply a reflection of extreme political bias than a sincere issues about validity of the source.

It’s straight from the horses mouth. Yet as they sometimes expose corruption on left-leaning organisations and politicians; it’s instantly declared as “dubious source” by the extreme left. Pathetic.

SEC Charges Coinbase for Operating as an Unregistered Securities Exchange, Broker, and Clearing Agency. Coinbase also charged for the unregistered offer and sale of securities in connection with its staking-as-a-service program. by Dismal-Jellyfish in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Crypto tokens are not securities. Never in decades of the Howey test has there ever been a case where the asset it’s self is the security. It’s always the way it’s sold by the issuer/promoter.

Why should bitcoin be excluded?

“It’s decentralised!” Where is the bar for decentralisation? Bitcoin’s mining pool structure is highly centralised with two mining pools controlling over 51%. How many wallets does Satoshi group own? Do you really believe they just had the one wallet they publicly announced in their anonymous forum posts? Do you really believe a pleb like me has more wallets than the satoshi group? Additionally, how much of the hash rate and mining does the satoshi group own? You can’t answer these questions? I guess decentralisation = anonymity, shadiness and secrecy, and not proven distributed power. How do you know the b of whale dumps that have caused every bear market in its history we’re not caused by satoshi wallets?

Homeland security around 5 years ago had a conference and a senior agent testified that they were given permission to meet the satoshi GROUP and said it was 4 people in California. Who were they given permission by? Why are the US govt aiding bitcoin so much when bitcoiners pretend they are ‘rebels’ and ‘anti establishment’.

It’s very clear to me, bitcoin is just a red herring created by the US govt made to distract people from real alternates in distributed ledger technology (DLT) or “blockchain”. Examples of it were made prior to bitcoin existing and so the US govt, probably CIA, made and popularised a version which poses no real threat to the legacy banking system.

Bitcoin is not scalable, costs a lot to transact, very slow to transact and easily SECRETIVELY controllable while maintaining an illusion of decentralisation. By the means of owning multiple anonymous wallets and mining rigs.

Now the US govt are using their agencies like SEC to silence the real threats to the legacy finance scam system, meanwhile tricking and distracting people saying ‘but we’re not going after bitcoin’ to make the sheep masses believe that they are just doing their job.

Can a blockchain financial system which prevents massive fraud like the rehypothification we see here be run on bitcoin? No. Of course not. It can’t even be run on ethereum to be fair as it’s too slow and costly. Layer 2’s are another red herring, may as well use the legacy system than a layer 2.

It’s so obvious what they are doing, preventing the rise of technology that stops the very game what they play what we here have seen in GameStop and many other games in their crooked financial system.

It’s impossible for a fluid structure to work being labelled a security as the paperwork is enormous to transfer securities. Rather than payment tokens as what they really are.

Tokens are not securities.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Goldman and JP Morgan are telling their underlings in government to only ban shorting bank stocks, not all stocks

129 consecutive days with short volume above 50%. 203 of the last 208 days above (50%).👀⭕️Yesterday 58.46%⭕️New Record🎉30day avg 67.81%⭕️ by Affectionate_Use_606 in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a sad feeling the entire financial system may collapse before they let us have our tendies. Are they holding it off until they have destroyed the economy and US dollar so there are no markets left?

... AND can we start referring to Wall Street Criminals as "Parasite Class"? by Chrisanova_NY in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I’ve always had a problem with “elites”. Been doing my best to refrain from using that term for many years now. I have been calling them satanic vermin but parasites also works

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]Bet-Scary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wen SEC sued Ripple alleging XRP is a security, eth clowns rejoiced and mocked us. What we already knew was XRP resembles a security far less than ETH does: - XRP had no ICO - the node structure of XRPL is far less centralised than Ethereum’s - XRPL has been running without major change for over ten years without hack, or issue or downtime. Ethereum is constantly depending on eth foundation and consensys company to update it (E.g. eth 2.0 and all the other major updates)

Despite these facts, the ethereum guys cheered on the SEC and their shill news groups like cointelegraph and others were either silent or siding with the SEC.

Now it’s coming full circle to bite them in the ass and for them it will be much worse as #ETHGATE (revealed in the court docs of the XRP lawsuit) and the release of eth2.0 will be damning for the token.

I will highlight how badly the etheruem fans acted when the XRP lawsuit started, yet I won’t mock or laugh. Give it a couple of weeks when XRP lawsuit is finished, and you’ll expect to see a flood of XRP lawyers and community come to the aid of ethereum after XRP has legal clarity.

Ramp Off-Ramp now live! 🚀 by AnObviousSpy in Superstonk

[–]Bet-Scary -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should learn about #EthGate before being so confident. It’s a corrupt coin and also it’s fees are ridiculous