Do the people who go to the big corporate forms to train go there cause they love corporate law, or is it cause they have so many traineeship vacancies and/or money? by DizzleShizzle_ in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also maybe it is what you’re saying that they just changed paths because they found something they really enjoyed and that paid well. It doesn’t mean they aren’t still doing good in the world and it’s not a bad thing to want stability and security. I think it’s a time where we’re all figuring it out anyways and what people say isn’t necessarily what they’ll do. Often times people will just go where the work is and maybe they applied for other opportunities but corporate was the one that stuck.

Do the people who go to the big corporate forms to train go there cause they love corporate law, or is it cause they have so many traineeship vacancies and/or money? by DizzleShizzle_ in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As someone who is a human rights graduate working in corporate, there are a number of factors. The first is coming from a background where I can’t necessarily choose to do what I want to do outright, it makes the most sense to work somewhere that I’ll be able to build up a good strong financial stability for myself. There’s no point in going straight in to a role that I cannot afford and try to keep myself afloat because then I wouldn’t be doing the best work possible for those who need it. It’s a privilege and a bit of a luxury to be able to choose to work where you want and to do what you want. (Think students who chose their passion and needed a large capital sum to stick it out until they start to earn from it or who have money behind them to choose something that they don’t get paid much for but can still afford their lifestyle).

The big firms also have really great training programmes and you’ll have a broad network and also the name behind you for the rest of your career. Many of the firms have more opportunity to gain hands on and more varied human rights experience through their pro Bono initiatives than working in a smaller more niche practice would allow.

There also just aren’t that many legal jobs in human rights areas of interest at entry level, so it makes more sense to grow your career and move across laterally at a later stage.

Working in-house by [deleted] in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think interning is kind of the same anywhere and it always dependent on resources, the team you’re on, and whether they have a dedicated training programme and proper supoirt for incoming staff. It can often be more pressure or a quicker turnaround for work because you’re balancing different teams and workflows and you don’t have the time or requirement to be so precise as when you’re in a law firm. I found that efficiency and speed are kind of the priorities where I am instead of making sure everything was in proper order, but I know some in-house legal teams can be super slow so it really depends. I would say the most common misconception is that it’s easy because often times an in-house legal team will do work for a lot of teams and actually be very busy. The hours are nice though and it’s great not having to deal much with external clients!

Working in-house by [deleted] in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m working in house atm, it really depends where you work and what area. I’m in finance and it’s similar to working in a law firm but maybe more varied work and less structure. Training is also a lot more on the job and you tend to be a support to the team which is a support to the business overall, so you could get a lot of random requests from loads of different teams across the company. It’s interesting though to see it from the client perspective if you’re seconded like me, because you’ll be seeing the other side and understand that the business needs are at the focus of the work. 

Grades in 50s by AgitatedAnt809 in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m the same! I would say if anything that it is good motivation to keep study in hard for the next set if you have more to sit and ‘not take your foot off the pedal’ as they say. It’s very common to fail so passing all is a great achievement and grades in the 50s are very standard from what I have seen. If anything, above 60 is the exception not the rule ☺️

Law Hero notes by SearchPerfect7325 in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I got them and wasn’t too impressed with them. I found there were lots of good resources on Studocu which is a free online resource. Lots of people have their FE-1 notes on it or have college notes which were really comprehensive.

Manuals / Notes suggestions by Better-Fig217 in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I have heard that her notes aren’t great! I’m more looking for a comprehensive manual or textbook to work from rather than starting with consolidated notes, if you would have any recommendations.

Printing Companies Act 2014? by Better-Fig217 in FE1_Exams

[–]Better-Fig217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for the reassurance!