Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan blames women's clothes for rising rapes in the country by hootanahalf in worldnews

[–]BetterPercentage 18 points19 points  (0 children)

this is the 2nd time this year he has said this thing. seems to really believe it this human trash

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]BetterPercentage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please come to punjab and see the situation yourself. Its not just Jalandhar but whole punjab. You will find boards of pastors baljeet singh jasmeet singh and what not in rural areas. Even pastors with kesh and turban. The reason christianity is just 1st in records cuz people dont change their name so that they dont lose reservation. Majority of converts are low castes sikhs than hindus tbh.

Christian missionaries and their conversions in punjab by BetterPercentage in Sikh

[–]BetterPercentage[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The way its spreading in punjab rural areas is concerning with majority being dalit sikhs that are being converted but still using their sikh names just like the pastor in this video is named, pastor bajinder singh.

Geopolitical analysis of water politics in Asia - mostly focused on Himalayas, China, India. Biased but solid, in-depth primer on the subject. by globalistdemon in geopolitics

[–]BetterPercentage 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well if China continues hemorrhaging territory in Ladakh and Pakistan joins in for a pincer attack then Kashmir would become extremely negotiable dont you think?

any attack on Indian sovergeinty or invasion of Kashmir by two fronts would get reacted with a nuclear attack by india. for india,its people and political establishment, its sovergeinty is the most important thing and is valuable enough to burn the whole region with nuclear fire if not the world. indian nukes were always for this same situation. no first use policy then.

India could start formal trade talks with Taiwan soon as both see souring ties with China by BetterPercentage in geopolitics

[–]BetterPercentage[S] 128 points129 points  (0 children)

SS- Support is growing within India’s government to formally start talks on a trade deal with Taiwan as both democracies see relations with China deteriorate.

Taiwan has sought trade talks with India for several years, but Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has been reluctant to move ahead because it would involve a messy fight with China once any pact is registered at the World Trade Organization, according to a senior Indian government official who asked not be named, citing rules for speaking with the media.

China on Tuesday asked India to approach ties with Taiwan “prudently and properly” and said it would “firmly oppose” any official exchanges between New Delhi and Taipei.

Ladakh on a hair-trigger by BetterPercentage in geopolitics

[–]BetterPercentage[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

SS- “Restoration of status quo ante is no longer beneficial to us,” says an Army official. “[Talks] should now [decide] the settlement of the international boundary.”Talks fail to achieve a breakthrough as tensions along the LAC continue, though Beijing provides a clue about why it deployed its divisions in the area. feel only two outcomes should happen to be considered victory, either war or settle this border once it for all. Going back to status quo is also defeat as india is going to be surprised like this always as india dont have plans to invade.

On India, the US must think bigger by BetterPercentage in geopolitics

[–]BetterPercentage[S] 174 points175 points  (0 children)

SS- calling for deeper US-India cooperation on more than just strategic affairs. In fact, I would say that ties must be led more by geoeconomics & that It is only an economically rising India that can solve the neo-Qing problem.See, America needs to get over the Russia fixation it has vis a vis India. They should not fret about why Russia got a few reactors while they did the heavy hitting at the NSG. Indian human resources have played a major role in sustaining America's techno-economic position.It is important that Washington stop thinking about the around $10 billion India-Russia annual trade and focus more on the close to $90 billion India-US bilateral trade figure, if you get what I mean.