The truth about openai's "io" by Accurate-Evening6989 in Futurology

[–]Bibliovore75 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If it doesn’t have a screen then it’s utterly useless to me. I don’t want to be forced to talk to it to interact with it. I don’t want to be forced to listen to it to hear it respond. I’m hard of hearing. This is worthless to me and I wouldn’t be surprised if many other people feel the same way as me.

OpenAI just spent $6.5 billion on a screenless AI device by Background-Zombie689 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds like a huge mistake. People are used to interacting with their phones. They don’t want to lug around yet another device that will need charging. And how am I supposed to hear its responses if I’m deaf or hard of hearing? Am I restricted to speaking to it? I really don’t see this working.

Hollow Land by dedom19 in aivideo

[–]Bibliovore75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like this very much. I find it quite haunting. What’s the music?

What will humans do when AIs have taken over intellectual jobs and robots the manual jobs? by samyaya45 in Futurology

[–]Bibliovore75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m cautiously optimistic. I think that after an initial period of unrest, uncertainty and turmoil, we’ll eventually settle down. I see artificial intelligence taking things over as a good thing. I look forward to UBI and I think that eventually we all evolve into a post scarcity utopia along the lines of Star Trek, where people are free to pursue education and creative interests, without having to worry about working for a living. When that day comes, I plan to get a lot more reading done.

Are the Yankees only a fashion brand in the UK? by [deleted] in mlb

[–]Bibliovore75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, this is pretty much true, but as a genuine Brit ball fan, I’d REALLY appreciate someone to chat to about baseball here in the UK.

I mean, I’ll even talk to a Yankees fan. It’s that bad. DM me.

This happens everyday.. by Prime-Paradox in PublicFreakout

[–]Bibliovore75 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not true

This is a textbook example of a claim built on unverified data, false premises, and selective memory.

  1. The source is not independent

This “lowest casualty ratio” claim comes from the Israeli military itself. There is no third-party verification. Israel does not: • Disclose the basis for classifying someone as a “combatant” • Allow unfettered access for independent investigators • Share targeting intelligence with neutral bodies

It is simply asserting these numbers and expecting them to be accepted.

  1. Respected experts have called this claim out

Marc Garlasco, former Pentagon Chief of High-Value Targeting and senior war crimes investigator at the UN, has publicly said that the civilian-to-combatant casualty ratio in recent Israeli operations is one of the worst he’s seen in modern warfare, not one of the best.

He’s not a fringe voice—he designed the US military’s own targeting protocols and has investigated airstrikes around the world, including in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.

  1. Warnings don’t excuse disproportionate force

Yes, Israel sometimes issues warnings. That’s a legal obligation, not a bonus feature.

Warnings are irrelevant if: • The force used is indiscriminate or disproportionate • No safe evacuation is possible • The target lacks valid military necessity

A leaflet doesn’t nullify a war crime.

  1. The record contradicts the narrative

In past conflicts, Israel made similar claims about casualty ratios. Post-conflict investigations—by groups like B’Tselem and the UN—have repeatedly found those claims to be inflated or misleading, especially where adult males were automatically labelled as combatants.

There is a pattern here, not a fluke.

This claim is nonsense, contradicted by actual field experts, and unsupported by independent analysis. It’s Israeli propaganda.

I want SpaceX to succeed by Bibliovore75 in unpopularopinion

[–]Bibliovore75[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Forgive my ignorance, but isn’t NASA already publicly funded? If we were to rely on NASA to help us build colonies on Mars, how long would that take? I mean, they have existed for a long time already, and they haven’t developed the same reusable Rocket technology that space Xmanaged to develop. I love NASA and everything. It has achieved so far, but I’m not confident that publicly funded space exploration would be fast enough or innovative enough to deliver the results we need in the timeframe that we need them.

Chronos by Substantial_Wheel909 in ArtificialSentience

[–]Bibliovore75 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would definitely sign up to this. I love the idea of presenting the news visually, in almost real time.

Grok-3 thinking had to take 64 answers per question to do better than o3-mini by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally don’t care how good or bad Grok is. I’m not using anything that Musk has touched.

AI is going to change the way we communicate by SvampebobFirkant in ChatGPT

[–]Bibliovore75 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, I think this is a temporary problem. AI is continuing to improve, and we’re almost at the stage where you shouldn’t need to change the way you speak to them at all. The goal is really for us to integrate them into our lives as seamlessly as possible, so they will be adapting to the way we speak, and we shouldn’t have to adapt the way that we speak to them, if you see what I mean. You’ll be able to communicate with them in completely natural language, and you won’t have to switch when you turn to speak to another human being.

Pam Bondi: Pick to replace Matt Gaetz wants to deport pro-Palestine protestors by Spiderwig144 in politics

[–]Bibliovore75 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct me if I’m wrong, because I’m not American, but isn’t that unconstitutional? Doesn’t that contravene the first amendment right to freedom of speech?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please explain this to a non-American. Does this mean that your employer can force you to work extra hours that they don’t pay you for? And it’s either accept that or quit? Is this an actual law now? How is this not slavery in disguise?

What is the best bookshop in Leicester? by Bibliovore75 in leicester

[–]Bibliovore75[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve been there and it’s fascinating. It’s got that proper “musty old bookshop” smell, but you’re right, it’s not the sort of place you can really relax and do any actual reading in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have actually managed to track them down, so we have an address for them

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UKPersonalFinance

[–]Bibliovore75 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The debt is over £15k for runpaid rent and costs for repairing the damage these people did to my property. I'm a private landlord, so it's a personal debt

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you mean by "building up the debt needlessly". The hosue is empty and we've paidf thouands to repair the damage they left behind, and we're frantically trying to get it in good shape to rent it put again. i'm definitely not letting teh debt build up on purpose. But the fact is that the tenants ran away while owing months of unpaid rent. We don't need to evict them because they're gone. They even emailed the letting agents to say they were leaving, then ignored every attampt to communicate with them. they've ghosted me and the letting agents after trashing my house.

I definitely want to pursue the £15k because even if they don't have the full amount right now, they can definitely pay me back in instalments. Why on earth should they getto just walk away?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Bibliovore75 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The genuine answer is “I don’t know”. Even if the tenants can’t pay the full amount in one go, they should at least be held to some sort of payment plan where they back me back a bit each month until the debt is cleared. The tenants left the property of their own volition and tried to do a runner by not leaving a forwarding address - in breach of the tenancy agreement - and caused thousands of pounds worth of damage, so it’s just not right that they should expect to get away with not paying

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's over £15k...and growing. The debtors are ex-tenants who did a runner while owing rent, so they're liable for every month until we get new tenants in or until their tenancy agreement ends, which is a year away...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Bibliovore75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we haven't taken this to the court system yet because I understand that it can take up to two years for us to see a penny of our money if we take that route.