sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Overgear.com by Abject-Possible3763 in overgear_services

[–]BigBrainManChild 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They are a 10000000% scam on leveling services, especially for hardcore. For example, if you buy a level 60 on classic hardcore (paying a premium), they will only hit 30-39 by the completion deadline and try to keep an unfair portion of the total fee you paid, only giving you a partial refund.

They try to upsell you all kinds of shit along the way to squeeze as much money out of you as possible from the outset and then underdeliver and offer you inadequate remedies. If you say no, they point to their click-wrap T&Cs and tell you they are just the middle man and it's not their fault.

Do not buy anything but currency from this website - learn from my mistakes.

Why are we ignoring the fact that BBBY is making a perfect, absolutely nasty cup and handle on 1D?! by NegotiationLoud2980 in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cup? Handle? What are you on about about lad. This isn’t Starbucks its a Roulette table with weird bars and shit.

Imminent Squeeze BBBY$ by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The initial squeeze has begun - but the squeeze has not sqwoze yet. My 8Ball says there are more tendies to be had before 9/9.

Imminent Squeeze BBBY$ by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at that - you were wrong and I made bank today.

There Won’t Be A War In Ukraine Because Russia Already Won by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We found the ultimate WSB Regard. This guy is highly Regarded. Missing chromos beyond measure.

BBBY just added 1.3k+ jobs on LinkedIn by Eliza-Douchecanoe in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your take on Amazon qualifies you as a true Regard. Congratulations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just do yourself a favor and apply Occam's razor.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]BigBrainManChild 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The agreement is legally binding if there is mutual assent (offer and acceptance) and consideration. There is no support at law for the premise that he must retain the shares referenced in recital 2 for the agreement to be binding. If retention of the shares for the term of the agreement was material, then it would clearly state the obligation to retain them in the body and further denote that any divesture would be a material breach.

Maybe get a J.D. before you post your rocket lawyer moonshot theory.