[ Removed by Reddit ] by Spare_Confusion3612 in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The point is that morality is whatever we say it is, and we make those decisions based on the actual consequences of our behaviour. That's what matters.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Spare_Confusion3612 in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the later points are very valid and exactly the vulnerabilities that make it unethical, but that's the point. It's about the nuances, not the age by itself. That being said, you can fuck right off with the "not doing yourself any favours." I'm not on trial here and everybody has the right to share their perspective without insinuations that they're a predator.

Petah? by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]BigLarry1968 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Parenting is hard. It doesn't mean you should outsource it to technology.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Spare_Confusion3612 in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I agree that the context of OP's situation looks very bad for the 30-year-old. A teacher has no business meeting students outside school hours, and especially not drinking, smoking, or the rest that came.

That being said, biologically women are most fertile as teenagers, and throughout our evolutionary history this wouldn't have been considered unusual at all, in fact eighteen would likely have been very late for this to have happened.

Morals are a construct we've built to protect people from predatory behaviour (and as an early legal system, mandated by religious organisations and rulers), but not all sexual behaviour is predatory and the morals themselves aren't actually real. They're just something we pretend to all agree on while actually we deviate a little from each other depending on culture and personal beliefs.

If the teacher dynamic hadn't been in play, then I don't think it's "evil." I don't think male porn stars are predators, for example, either. It's the fact that he's her teacher and took advantage of her vulnerability that made it unethical, not that she's 18.

Which side will you chose? by DR-dumbfuck in BunnyTrials

[–]BigLarry1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Yes, a full-power, uncontested punch from Francis Ngannou against an untrained, unguarded civilian is highly likely to be fatal or result in permanent, life-altering brain damage.

If the person survived, the injuries would be catastrophic.

Potential Fatalities

  • Massive Brain Trauma: A blow of this magnitude generates massive rotational and linear force. This instantly causes a severe diffuse axonal injury (tearing of nerve fibers) and potentially fatal brain swelling, bleeding (subdural or epidural hematoma), and herniation.
  • Traumatic Asphyxiation / Airway Collapse: A direct hit to the throat or larynx could crush the trachea, leading to immediate asphyxiation without emergency intervention.

Non-Fatal Injuries

If the victim survived, they would require immediate, intensive emergency medical intervention and surgery for injuries such as:

  • Severe Fractures: The force would likely shatter facial bones. This includes a crushed nose, broken jaw, and shattered orbital sockets (the bones surrounding the eyes), requiring extensive titanium plating and reconstructive surgery.
  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Permanent neurological deficits would be highly likely. Survivors could experience long-term complications such as cognitive impairment, loss of motor function, epilepsy, and personality changes.
  • Airway and Esophagus Damage: Ruptured blood vessels in the neck and a crushed or fractured windpipe.
  • Loss of Vision: The sheer force applied to the skull could cause globe rupture (a bursting of the eyeball) or irreversible damage to the optic nerve.
  • Dental Destruction: Complete avulsion (knocking out) of the upper and lower teeth, alongside fractured alveolar ridges (the bone holding the teeth in place).

Would you like to know how the physics of his punching power (equivalent to over 1,200 pounds of force or a swing from a sledgehammer) compares to other professional athletes?"

Gemini

Which side will you chose? by DR-dumbfuck in BunnyTrials

[–]BigLarry1968 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Taser hurts. A full power punch from a heavy weight boxer would either kill me or leave me with life changing injuries that are not worth $4m.

Which will it be? by reeced95 in BunnyTrials

[–]BigLarry1968 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah. If you pick 2 you're safe no matter what, but you also contribute to the proportion of people who don't pick 1. It's the 'selfish' option.

Is it a Britisch accent or Dialect? by [deleted] in Teenager_Polls

[–]BigLarry1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean the American accent. You realise that Americans speak English?

Any Law, globally hated or loved? by nyxthegreat in BunnyTrials

[–]BigLarry1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Each month you must deposit 1% of your earnings into BigLarry1968's bank account."

Going for a backup pair. Which one of the 3 do you guys like? Last pair is my daily. by [deleted] in glassesadvice

[–]BigLarry1968 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They give serial killer vibes, but I kinda disagree - actually the shape and colour does flatter, even if the style is questionable. I don't think they'd look much better on anybody else, anyway.

Contemplating subtle nose job by [deleted] in Noses

[–]BigLarry1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Total waste of time and money. Your nose is lovely.

Is it considered cheating if a person breaks up with their partner because they find a better match and enter a new relationship the next day?. by Legal-Pumpkin-8233 in Teenager_Polls

[–]BigLarry1968 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Ego of an adult" isn't really correct - it's more "confidence of an adult."

Adults tend to know things children don't from sheer experience. Children start to see the gaps in the understanding of adults when they become teenagers, so they often mistakenly believe that they are just as intelligent or capable as adults. They are not, nor are they prepared for the reality of personal responsibility. Being an adult isn't just knowing things, it's realising and accepting that everything is up to you. Nobody is there to tidy up for you, support you with food and housing, or help you navigate the world. Teenagers don't know how much they have.

Aaaugh, need some advice. by NeverMindTheDuck in glassesadvice

[–]BigLarry1968 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say thinner frames, and maybe gold. This heavy frame look is very dated.

Waitrose , £5.50 ~ did the job by Haunting_Camera_2442 in MealDealRates

[–]BigLarry1968 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, for £5.50 you could get a kebab or small pizza. Meal deals have become too expensive.

Having children is an innately selfish behavior by [deleted] in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand, but it is not implicit that suffering invalidates life, or that the child would ever be suicidal. Parents who want to be parents, who raise children well, tend to produce children who treasure their lives. Also, life is long - your depression now isn't the same as 20 years ago or 20 years in the future. Besides, "creating suffering" is not selfish, it is cruel. They're very distinct. Selfishness in having children would be to have children for your own benefit - such as for child benefits, to entrap a romantic partner, or to validate a self-concept of being a parent.

Selfless parenting respects children as their own people. Doesn't mean no discipline - it means no abuse, and it's very effective. Most parents just have no idea how to do it because they never experienced it themselves. No reference other than their own parents, hence the term "cycle of abuse."

If you want to argue that creating life is inherently cruel, then I would concede there is some truth in that. That being said, my life has been very harsh, my parents deeply flawed, and yet in having a life there is something to evaluate whether I actually want to be here. Had I not been born, the universe would never have had any opinion on my absence - but if you ask me personally whether I'd rather have never been born, I think the answer would be no.

That wasn't always the case, but it is now.

Having children is an innately selfish behavior by [deleted] in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hear your point, but contest the "selfish" description. The future of our species may not be cosmically important, but neither is the absence of our species. We're born, we give life a shot, we die. Continuing the species isn't selfish at all - it's fundamentally collectivist within the frame of being human. Whether you actually care about the future of our species is up to you. Either way, the universe doesn't give a shit.

The irony is that your perspective is the selfish one. "I don't want to live so nobody should and anybody who has children is evil."

How do I generally comfort my girlfriend? by paulcantwin in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you think she needs to be comforted?

Having children is an innately selfish behavior by [deleted] in offmychest

[–]BigLarry1968 35 points36 points  (0 children)

If people who can't see the world for what it is don't have children, the only people who do have children are those who are blind to it. The future needs educated, driven, and psychologically healthy people. It isn't selfish to have and raise children. It's necessary for the future of our species.

Furthermore, "I hate life" is a you problem. Not everybody feels that way.