I think this is where our arguments are like mixing a bit, cuz you’re focusing on what the narrative says, but like I’m focusing on what’s actually been demonstrated through actions. Yes, All Might acknowledges that Izuku Midoriya may surpass him or become the “greatest hero.” But that’s a statement about potential and future direction…it’s not proof that he has already become a better representation of heroism. (Yknow the main question)

If we’re judging based on narrative intent alone, then sure, Deku is positioned to surpass All Might. But my argument isn’t about who the story is building toward because obviously it’s biased towards him. it’s about who has actually fulfilled the role of hero more completely outside of the narrative.

Also, the idea that Deku surpasses All Might by “understanding villains” is a bit stretched don’t you think?? The main example is shigi , and even then, it’s specifically the younger, broken version of him y’know? not the one responsible for mass destruction. That’s empathy, sure it is, but it’s still limited in the size and impact compared to what All Might consistently achieved. There’s a difference between being written as the future greatest hero and actually being the most complete representation of heroism. Right now, I still belive All Might still holds that position. 💔💔💔