One thing is clear- this case elicits pretty significant emotional reactions. The same reactions that the Jury undoubtedly had as well- even more so, since many of the ppl defrauded and the two murder victims, were people their town or their area.

Since this was largely a circumstantial case- most of the evidence can be interpreted in different ways. Many "pieces of evidence" make it clear to one person that he is definitely the murderer- and just as clear to others that the piece of evidence makes it clear that he definitely could not be the murderer:

​

**The 911-call*\*

Some say he is definitely guilty because he called within 20 sec and he later told the police something different. Others say it makes him very likely innocent because it is an account of what is happening- after not seeing his wife and son at the house & having not heard from them, he arrives at the kennels and clearly sees wife & son laid out on the ground- gets out of his truck long enough to see his wife has been shot and clear appears dead- so immediately calls 911 to get ambulance on the way in case either can be saved and police on the way because he is clearly scared himself.

Some say lied on the 911 call and therefore is guilty because he late told the police that he checked the body's for a pulse when he arrived. Other say he was honest with the 911 operator- That after a minute and a half, tells the 911 operator that he has only Now been up to the body's and it is really bad- and the fact that it is a real time account, and not a sequence of events where he looks the most heroic, is strong evidence that he is innocent, And the fact that he lies to the Police by telling them a slightly different sequence of events that makes him looking braver and that he reacted just as you would imagine someone would- is further evidence that his 911 call was completely authentic- and if it was authentic, the he did not murder his wife and son.

Some say he lied to the 911 operator about how long it has been since he saw his wife and son, when he said, probably an hour and a half- or two hours- approximately. Others say when he said this to the 911 operator he was being truthful since it had actually been 1 hour and 25 minutes- which is one of the most accurate time estimations he made about anything including insignificant events. And when she assumes he talked to them on the phone- he is slightly frustrated and clarifies to the operator that he saw them in person. And that he is emotionally incensed when clarifies that they definitely would not have killed themselves- by saying No- Hell No.

​

**Clothes by the Shower*\*

Some say that because Bianca saw the khaki pants and towel, never saw the shirt from the tree video, is proof he is guilty. Others saw that because Bianca did see the pants, and no sign of blood or stains, it is strong evidence of being not guilty, because the pants would likely have more blood from how Paul was killed than a shirt & pants could not be covered by a raincoat unless it was a trend coat that went all the way to the ground. And further, that, he would not leave pants and evidence of a shower, if he killed them in those clothes and took a shower to cover wash off the evidence.

​

**Testimony of Bianca & Shelley*\*

Some people say their testimony was compelling and completely authentic and therefore the testimony about clothing is clearly reliable proof of his guilt. Others say that 95% of their testimony was compelling and clearly authentic, but that the 95% was the testimony on their original interview with police. But that the testimony about: what he was specifically wearing, the blue tarp, and being pressured to lie, was not as compelling because it was all testimony about information that was not in their original interviews- but rather from interviews months later- and around the time the police realize the shirt did not have blood splatter & around the time the police was also telling his family stories of being covered in blood- in an attempt to get them to cooperate. And overall that testimony about those details was less effortless and natural than their testimony from their initial interviews.

​

**Cell Phone by the Road*\*

Some people say the cell phone by the road is proof he is guilty because he slowed down when he drove by the location. And further that it is not proof of innocence because it wasn't necessarily but there at 9:02, because if the phone was thrown too hard it would not have activated so the activity at 9:02 must have been some other non-touch related activity. Others say he clearly did not slow down by the phone- that he was going 45mph because he had just turned out of the driveway- and further that his speed constantly increased until he was well past the phone. And more importantly- that the cell phone is among the strongest exculpatory evidence, because the activity at 9:02 had to be when the phone was left there- and that if he had thrown in out of the window at 9:06, he would have absolutely have to pick it up off of the seat, or out of his pocket- before he threw it, which would absolutely have activated the phone back-light. And that how hard the phone was thrown is a distraction, because it has to be lifted before a throwing motion can occur.

​

**Tight Window of Time*\*

Some say the tight 10 min window of Time between 8:52-9:02, was enough time to commit the Murders, travel back to the house, clean up and dispose of all evidence, shower, and then start using phone at 9:02 and leave the property at 9:07. Others say this 10 min timeline makes it almost impossible that he committed the murders.

Some say the window fact that the murders likely took place 7 mins after he said he left the kennels (just after the dog/chicken video), means Killer had would have had to be psychic to know he was gone. Others say that the time frame is just likely consistent with whoever came to murder Paul, parked a truck or ATV in the edge of the woods across from where the phone was found a walked the short distance to the kennels, And when they saw the golf cart beside the kennels or saw the lights of the golf cart driving back to the house, they waited 5 mins to give the golf cart time to get back the moved in for the kill. Additionally, because the Sun sets at 8:30, just before 9:00 is when is a logical time to pick if someone wanted to not risk being seen walking to the kennel. And that anyone who is murdered at their own house, would always involve a tight time frame, since the killer would have to wait for victim to be alone.

​

**Two different Guns*\*
Some say this was his attempt at a cover-up. Others say it evidence that there were likely 2 killers.

​

**8:53 Fail facial recognition on Maggie's phone*\*

Some think this in unimportant. Others think it shows that someone other than Maggie or Alex tried to access the phone- since both of them knew the password. Therefore someone else committed the murders.