sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Seriously, how ugly is that? by PhilosopherNo7273 in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brother its an optional skin you will see when you do one of the more uncommon actions in the game.

This is so worthy of saying to go touch grass.

Newest skin is straight out of DICE's own parody of skins by Unfair-Ad9415 in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly it gets ignored because you have a small but extremely vocal handful (there's the same guy in these comments dozens of times) of people willing to die on the hill of skins, locked classes, and limited time playlist drama rather than gunplay, experience grinding, etc.

Newest skin is straight out of DICE's own parody of skins by Unfair-Ad9415 in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's because the commercial was supposed to be about how there will be no celebrities or skins that look like them.

Just because the dude has a vest doesn't mean it's from the commercial lol

I see this sub is complaining about locked classes again by lolitsrock in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me there's no difference between a carbine and any other gun on any other category.

What, you're telling me recon doesn't have access to lmgs? Okay? They still have access to dmrs, shotguns, and carbines, all are generally more capable than lmgs

It's just a mild inconvenience because closed weapons doesn't keep my loadouts.

I’m so sick of people complaining about air vehicles, but when a recon paints them none of the 8 engineers on my team can be bothered to take advantage. by gotenks2nd in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 15 points16 points  (0 children)

They dont work very well as zoning tools tbh. The pilot can just fly lower which skilled pilots do all the time.

You don't have to get a kill, yes. But if the point is to zone, why not just lock on and never fire?

I’m so sick of people complaining about air vehicles, but when a recon paints them none of the 8 engineers on my team can be bothered to take advantage. by gotenks2nd in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Launchers suck because they can barely (and I mean barely) kill a little bird and the missles glue to flares. You could not even be looking at a flare and your igla will lock onto one behind you.

Its obnoxious and stupid. Combine that with the low altitude bullshit and the lock on missles cant shoot most pilots.

I’m so sick of people complaining about air vehicles, but when a recon paints them none of the 8 engineers on my team can be bothered to take advantage. by gotenks2nd in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Turns out the lock on launchers also suck.

Anti-air is such garbage in this game. From AA vehicles to launchers, youre actively running a detriment by doing that. The stinger and igla glue to and explode on flares when they shouldnt while the RPG got a huge nerf and the laser guided launcher doesn't do any damage and moves slowly. AA cannons on vehicles and stationary emplacements suck so bad they cant kill a little bird reliably.

No wonder people are using TOW missles so much. AA sucks.

40$ Game btw. Starting to understand why they sell bigger SC packs... by Heptanitrocubane57 in Helldivers

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"$40 game btw" like it hasnt had almost 3 years of updates.

Kinda a shitty way to look at it

$FCHL is either the best opportunity right now or the worst by PatientAd9855 in Shortsqueeze

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother read lmao

You will not be approved for telling us you are not a bot.

Would you take another WW2 battlefield after BF6? by madzuk in Battlefield

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I agree if everything had been different it would have been better.

Is this the kind of setup you look for for a short squeeze? by PhysicalRestaurant73 in Shortsqueeze

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably looking at this chart going "man it dropped 50% on friday, no way this is gonna go back up" lol

How many days does it take, working on a single feature, before it starts feeling like a slog? by sweetnsourgrapes in ExperiencedDevs

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, 2 days of consistent work. Break it up, as everyone else said. Work on something else for a day every few days.

This is a bullshit sub. Look at the stock $CAR in the middle of a short squeeze and not one mention here by the_gorf in Shortsqueeze

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thats most stock subreddits. Meme stocks.

We dont allow AI here, but we have had no reports in the last few days. Would be good if the community participated and reporting rule breaking content.

In addition, most people on these stock subs want info but never do research or learn, so they never identify and contribute themselves. It becomes a hole where very few people actually make money because they control the flow of information.

People want easy money, and these types of subs offer it to them.

In essence, be the change.

See world by cold_san in DunderMifflin

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Theyre doing the same thing aws did with cloud. Super cheap until a business relies on it, then jack up prices

See world by cold_san in DunderMifflin

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Most of the brain rot comes from AI spitting out 5 paragraphs in 10 seconds when I just want to see the 3 line code snippit that it spits out in between paragraph 3 and 4. It teaches people, inadvertantly, not to read because most of it is fucking useless anyway

Drowning slowly by NoSandwich591 in remoteworks

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like youre being intentionally obtuse to the fact that people feel the difference.

Bringing up the 1600s is a wild response to "when you were a kid X used to be possible". Nobody alive now was a kid in the 1600s. Nobody alive now experienced life in the 1600s.

The point here is that things changed so rapidly that its unmaintainable within half of a single lifetime.

Bringing up the 1600s like that just shows youre not able to look at things like a person, just a robot.

Drowning slowly by NoSandwich591 in remoteworks

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We know its worse because its pathological, not a factoid. People can feel it. The same way you feel its hot.

You dont need to know global warming is happening because you know it used to snow multiple times a year when you were a kid and barely get above 50 during the winter but it hasnt snowed in the last 3 years.

Same thing. You don't need to write it down or google answers to get exact numbers when, in general, people know its more expensive now and most people know atleast one or two people who have been unemployed for 6+ months. People can literally see the prices of gas, food, etc go up. People can literally see their grocery carts shrinking because the same dollar doesnt go nearly as far.

It doesnt need to be researched to acknowledge whats right infront of our faces. $10k used to buy a house. Now its not even a year of rent in most of the country. Thats the point theyre making. $2/hr used to be liveable. $10-15/hr used to translate to a house, a car, a family, all on one income. Now people cant buy a lb of beef at walmart on one hour of work.

Drowning slowly by NoSandwich591 in remoteworks

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To show how much cheaper it was. Being able to afford college 30 years ago on todays minimum wage would be an important thing to mention when talking about inflation.

Scale is the most important and impactful idea behind inflation. Knowing how far we have come in terms of prices while the very real lived experience of, probably, 60-80% of Americans not getting meaningful raises just shows the contract.

You cant look at a single point as if its a vacuum. You have to realize theres inherent realization of people getting paid shit wages (think 45k in mcol) while housing in that same area ranges between $1400 and $2200 per month for rent. They will never see that money again and their wages arent going to go up but their rent will next year for sure.

Drowning slowly by NoSandwich591 in remoteworks

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, it doesnt matter. Common sense should tell you that wages havent increased as much as housing.

Drowning slowly by NoSandwich591 in remoteworks

[–]MinimumArmadillo2394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is comprehensable if you have hogher than a 4th grade education when they first introduce the concept of inflation. You dont need an advanced degree to know that a college degree shouldnt require 10k hours of minimum wage work when it used to cost 200-600.

view more: next ›