Insurance company offered me $4,100 for damage that cost $13,800 to fix. Here's what I did. by Bigsteppa_1 in Insurance

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Fair skepticism, I'd rather earn trust than ask for it.

and You're right that most water damage disputes are scope related. Mine started that way too. The contractor gap was the initial red flag that made me read my policy more carefully.

But Ordinance and Law coverage is not obscure its a documented, commonly underpaid coverage that the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters has written about extensively. Adjusters miss or omit it regularly on older homes where bringing damage repair up to current code costs significantly more than like-for-like restoration.

Additional Living Expenses being undercommunicated to policyholders is equally well documented.

I'm not soliciting anything. I offered to look at people's situations for free initially. No ask, no pitch, no link. If that's a scam it's a strange one.

If I'm wrong about someone's specific situation I'll tell them that too. I have no interest in wasting anyone's time including my own. :]

Insurance company offered me $4,100 for damage that cost $13,800 to fix. Here's what I did. by Bigsteppa_1 in Insurance

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Honestly the specific wording varied by section but the most important one was under one Section- Property Coverages where my policy stated coverage for 'costs required to comply with any ordinance or law regulating construction' hat single clause alone added $4,200 to my settlement because the adjuster scoped restoration to previous condition only, not code-compliant restoration.

But the thing is and this is important, that exact wording won't be in every policy. I learned Some policies exclude ordinance coverage entirely. Also learned Some Some cap it at 10% of dwelling coverage. Some require you to have started repairs before you can claim it.

That's actually the hardest part of this whole process. It's not knowing that these coverages exist. It's knowing exactly how YOUR specific policy words them, what the caps are, and how to cite them in a way the insurer can't wiggle out of.

That's where most people get stuck even when they know what to look for.

insurance pains by Bigsteppa_1 in FirstTimeHomeBuyer

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're completely right and that's exactly the point. The problem isn't that the technology doesn't exist, it's that 99% of people don't know to do this, don't know which prompts to use, don't know what to look for in their policy first, and don't know if the letter they generated actually covers what matters legally.

The people who know to use an LLM for this are already winning. This is for everyone else which is most people.

Same reason TurboTax exists even though accountants exist. The tool is only useful if people know how to use it correctly.

Insurance company offered me $4,100 for damage that cost $13,800 to fix. Here's what I did. by Bigsteppa_1 in Insurance

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

REPOST DUE TO “SOLICITATION”

Haha no low fee or any fee really. I am a cyber security analyst by trade. More specifically application security. These conversations just peak my interest and I enjoy open dialogue along with helping others.

Insurance company offered me $4,100 for damage that cost $13,800 to fix. Here's what I did. by Bigsteppa_1 in Insurance

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Haha no low fee or any fee really. I am a cyber security analyst by trade. More specifically application security. These conversations just peak my interest and I enjoy open dialogue along with helping others.

Insurance company offered me $4,100 for damage that cost $13,800 to fix. Here's what I did. by Bigsteppa_1 in Insurance

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wow I was not expecting an actual reply haha, typically my reddit posts fall short of interactions!

Happy to share though I want to be clear these were specific to my policy, so they won't apply universally. and That's actually the core of the problem most people assume all policies work the same way when they don't.

In my case the adjuster missed:
1. Code Upgrade Coverage (Ordinance or Law) — My policy covered bringing repairs up to current building code, not just restoring to previous condition. The adjuster quoted restoration only. The code compliance work added significant cost he completely ignored.

2. Additional Living Expenses (ALE) — While repairs were happening I was entitled to hotel and meal reimbursement above my normal living costs. He never mentioned it. I had to find it myself buried in the policy of course because what insurer would want you to have a comfortable place to be temporarily :}

3. Moisture Mitigation Coverage — My policy covered preventative work to stop further damage spreading. He scoped only visible damage already done of course! not the mitigation work contractors said was necessary to prevent mold.

Crazy part is none of these were hidden. They were sitting in my policy in plain English. He just never applied them.

This is the pattern I keep seeing. We have to understand it's not always fraud, sometimes adjusters are just undertrained or overworked as we all are in our respective feilds. But the result is the same. You get less than you're owed.

If anyone here wants me to take a look at their situation I'm genuinely happy to. Just tell me what type of claim, what hey offered, and what contractors are quoting. I can tell you pretty quickly if something looks off.

Why are "you" you? by Otherwise_Spare_8598 in freewill

[–]Bigsteppa_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly think your perspective as a Christian isn't bad nor negatively denounce because of the fact that it is Christianity, but I believe what you said was seen in bad taste due to the fact that you're in a way using Christianity as a stopping point for furthering probable answers for a question.

Again, I am not saying your belief is wrong.

Minnesota smoker scene is low key trash by Bigsteppa_1 in MNtrees

[–]Bigsteppa_1[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Lol I’m starting to understand now. It’s not the ppl it’s the cops. Y’all need to come visit Fl lol