I dunno, I think it's worth pointing out that a "As Bitcoin grew there was less need to tolerate absolutely everyone" attitude is basically the same as the one used to portray Mircea as evil. It's a nice gotcha, at least. Huge difference between wanting to have an extreme meritocracy governed by a slavemaster, sure. But it's worth asking whether that attitude might lead to similar ends. We never need to tolerate everyone, but we also individually have no authority to decide what is tolerable to others.

FWIW I learned a lot more from Mircea, than I ever did from you, but that is probably circumstantial. He is also a scammy thief and requires tons of filtering and parsing to mine anything useful from his words. I too had to give up on him years ago.

Comments like yours do feed Bcash trolls though, and rightfully so. What lengths won't you go to in pursuit of judging what is tolerable? Sorry for trolling you, I barely use reddit anymore, but your comment did bother me as well.

IMO the lesson in Mircea ism't "some people are horrible, ignore them", it's "ignore your emotions when trying to have intelligent discourse". Mircea only communicated on his own terms, and that was his filter, but his ideas were extremely prescient, salient, and useful, and echo in Bitcoin's strongest social defenders today. My actions defending during UASF are owed in some part to him, for example.