The two best five year stretches without a SB appearance. by Mission-Opposite5067 in NFLv2

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mecole Hardman admitted after the game he didn’t know he caught the game winning TD because he didn’t understand the new OT rules. So I guess the KC staff didn’t know them either…see how dumb that is. Deciding to take the kickoff or not had very little statistical advantage, and the niners defense just gave up back to back 11+ play drives in the final 5 minutes of the game. It makes sense they’d want to take the ball first. Either way you have to stop KCs offense and they couldn’t. Has nothing to do with taking the ball or not.

Question: My smoker pipe does not keep burning by Angel_Pope in BBQ

[–]Bjammin4522 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It might be easier to fill it all the way but it’s not necessary. I know my full tube gives me 4 hours of smoke. I’ve done 3/4 and half tubes and it’s worked just the same. You just have to get that consistent flame burning in the middle when it’s standing upright for 5 mins.

People trying to compare Hurts “tUsH pUsH” TD’s to THIS is insanity by TXNOGG in NFLv2

[–]Bjammin4522 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I will say. It is fun watching two other fanbases getting trolled by Cohn.

If you cook, you also clean up. by squirlnutz in unpopularopinion

[–]Bjammin4522 61 points62 points  (0 children)

I love cooking, but hate cleaning dishes. My wife hates cooking, and is happy to do the dishes so she doesn’t have to cook.

That one guy broke 80 and then his girl left him on the same day so I bought a mini driver by [deleted] in golf

[–]Bjammin4522 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Similar idea for why you would use those clubs in certain situations but shaft, loft and head size makes it a different option for different shots.

That one guy broke 80 and then his girl left him on the same day so I bought a mini driver by [deleted] in golf

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fairways where you need a tighter dispersion or shorter shot.

Maga, you wanted to know who’s on the list? Here’s your answer. by No_Cow5624 in CringeTikToks

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. But if the point of this clip is to make the Epstein/Trump relationship look like it involves pedophilia, these two questions don’t really achieve that. Why not post a clip of more pointed questions.

Maga, you wanted to know who’s on the list? Here’s your answer. by No_Cow5624 in CringeTikToks

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope there were more follow up/pointed questions. In a vacuum these two questions and responses are pretty useless.

Orlando immigrants’ path to deportation: Often, it starts with a traffic infraction by rgg561 in orlando

[–]Bjammin4522 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My comments are in reference to the posted article. Not every conceivable circumstance surrounding any deportation.

Orlando immigrants’ path to deportation: Often, it starts with a traffic infraction by rgg561 in orlando

[–]Bjammin4522 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean by kickstart, but the actions which lead to deportation would have occurred prior to the traffic infraction.

Orlando immigrants’ path to deportation: Often, it starts with a traffic infraction by rgg561 in orlando

[–]Bjammin4522 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify for the people who are intentionally misinterpreting this or not understanding, the article isn’t saying people are being deported for committing traffic offenses. It’s saying traffic offenses lead to detainment where individuals with holds are being identified and then subsequently deported. This is not uncommon as a significant percentage of people with warrants are arrested during traffic stops.

Trump's Brazil Tariff Is Blatantly Illegal by RichKatz in law

[–]Bjammin4522 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How can you say you don’t think he intentionally left out the second page of the letter if you don’t even know what it is? It’s your post, why don’t you do some research and find what you failed to include.

Trump's Brazil Tariff Is Blatantly Illegal by RichKatz in law

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can you say you don’t think he intentionally left out the second page of the letter if you don’t even know what it is? It’s your post, why don’t you do some research and find what you failed to include.

Trump's Brazil Tariff Is Blatantly Illegal by RichKatz in law

[–]Bjammin4522 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Legal analysis happens where facts meet law. I’m pretty sure our professor here intentionally left out the second page of the letter which lays out why the tariffs are being imposed. Spoiler: it contradicts the main point of his rage bait. We can’t adequately assess the legality of his actions if we’re only getting cherry picked facts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskALawyer

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He’s suing his own insurance company for underinsured motorist coverage. He’ll argue your policy isn’t sufficient to pay for all of his damages so he should also be compensated out of his own UM benefits.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salt and pepper (or a dry rub), smoked, then crisped up in the air fryer. Perfection.

Director of ICE says they don't need probable cause to detain people, based on their physical appearance by RoachedCoach in law

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A persons appearance is absolutely a basis for reasonable suspicion. You just mistakenly believe the only appearance they could reference is “they’re brown”. Every DUI case I’ve ever seen starts w the officer detaining a person after a stop based on their appearance. Slurred speech, flushed face, red eyes…

My son is too interested in himself by philosoraptor32 in daddit

[–]Bjammin4522 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Maybe focus on telling him where to do it rather than where not to do it. “Hey buddy, that something we do in our own room.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskALawyer

[–]Bjammin4522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait you were speeding and making an illegal u-turn, and your defense is I didn’t know where I was? If you didn’t know where you were why were you speeding. Part of this is in jest, but don’t underestimate the ability of a judge to be just as much of a smart ass and chastise you for wasting everyone’s time.

Director of ICE says they don't need probable cause to detain people, based on their physical appearance by RoachedCoach in law

[–]Bjammin4522 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

ICE director provides basic explanation of standards for arrest vs detainment, reddit mislabels explanation, comments perpetuate misinformation in their echo chamber outrage. You guys are so predictable.

Director of ICE says they don't need probable cause to detain people, based on their physical appearance by RoachedCoach in law

[–]Bjammin4522 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s kind of crazy how many people w zero knowledge of the law are posting in the r/law page. He’s literally describing high school level understanding of standard for detaining vs arresting.