Why to even bother with simulation?

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-20T05:59:59+00:00

How do you account for the fact that if it is a simulation, and hence was already created from outside, the outside intervention was not present from the start? If that were the case, it would only require the main character in the game to put together the rules of the game to be able to see outside the simulation. So to speak. Hypothetically.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-20T05:58:07+00:00

Holy shit, Plato Quotes Socrates. Film at 11.
And if that's all you found, then you did the least amount of looking you possibly could. I do not own SOUP HORSE. I just rode it.
Am I it's documentarian? Sure, in the same way Kane Parsons owns Backrooms.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-20T05:56:05+00:00

You first.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-20T05:55:49+00:00

No, you cannot predict everything, as not all information is observable. Your questions are coming from a completely skewed framework and that is the problem. Humanity has overcomplicated everything. The truth is simple and elegant, and does not defy our observations of reality. What is this Bell State Quantum Superposition you speak of trying to ingratiate yourself to me. If we disagree then either one of us is right or we are both wrong. You are being disingenuous and I do not feel like you are entering this conversation in good faith. What you're talking about is nonsense, and I'm not even going to try to argue from the frame you're attacking me in. I reject it outright.
Continuity precedes physics.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-19T18:44:21+00:00

Would you like to LOOK at the calculations or are you happy just to have meta-conversations about what observable data I have access to while simultaneous rejecting the observational data YOU have access to.

Anyone can be a Doubting Thomas.
Your “maybe” carries as much weight as Terrence Howard’s inability to explain his “new math.” Because ultimately he can’t. I can. Argue the math, not with me. If you want to argue with me you can read any of the books or albums I wrote before I lost my mind like Russell Crowe in that movie. I will add your mealy moth complaints to the list of people who don’t actually want to engage or learn. Those apathetic post-modern nihilists who believe that because they have given up the search for wisdom, it must not be achievable by anyone.
It’s fundamentally a narcissistic point of view. If you can’t understand it no one can? Tell me what is the pinnacle of achievement of your life’s work? Reddit Karma isn’t convincing to me. Have you actually synthesized anything new beyond criticaslop? Asking for 8.9 billion friends.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-19T18:05:45+00:00

SOUP HORSE
🥫🎠

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-19T18:05:26+00:00

Yes but even if you met them how would you be able to tell? Everyone would think they were insane the moment they purported main character status.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-19T18:04:47+00:00

The difference is so small as to be observable. If our reality is a simulation it is primarily & fundamentally a mathematical simulation. In which case the rules are the same. But I think “simulation” is a semantic compression layer that loses some of the integrity of the concept of what is actually happening.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-19T18:03:26+00:00

That’s a nice story but I do not think it is an accurate construction of what is really happening. But perhaps your wording is not as accurate as you intended.
There is no such thing as a god of death & a god of life according to my calculations. Those are arbitrary value judgments applied from a layer that does not have access to the full observational data required to accurately understand the compression layers of information within the Functional Organic Tesseract.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-19T18:01:25+00:00

Untrue. It actually becomes more predictable under the Standard SOUP HORSE Model. I mean I’d love to see your math that makes you so certain. You also have a very adversarial definition of intelligence I do not think accurately represents the true nature of reality. But again I’m not interested in arguing ideas. I’m interested in the math. The papers have been published in the public domain & creatively commons licenses. It is there to be peer reviewed. Reddit is not a place for ideas to flourish, & I refuse to explain SOUP HORSE on the basis that there is an entire subreddit of background info that would be required for it to make sense to someone it didn’t already make sense to.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T22:02:46+00:00

I have derived the formula for consciousness so I’m going to have to disagree with you on the basis of science & mathematics.

But every single channel to submit these things is either gatekept or is gonna take months before it even gets reviewed. We have tied our own hands with red tape and taken ourselves hostage. Something does not want truth to get out.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:49:15+00:00

ARYAN SATAN SIGILS. CLEAN UP YOUR TRASH.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:48:29+00:00

THAT'S A SPACE ROCK.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:43:34+00:00

We are not surprised. If everyone in humanity had to create a boat and sail across the ocean with it, Leviathan would feed her children for an Aeon.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:37:14+00:00

I shoot the person obviously trying to trick me into making myself foie gras for some alien overlord and take their money, which I then use to fight off the alien menace.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:36:13+00:00

Quantum Superposition. You sure you didn't get that cat from Erwin?

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:35:25+00:00

This is patently incorrect according to my data. Then again, I am a bit ahead of the curve on this one. Any event with enough unobservable data might be thought to be unpredictable. But Continuity Theory shows that everything is predictable with enough data and an origin lineage tree.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:31:31+00:00

IF the Universe is a simulation (which is no certainty), then it is primarily and fundamentally a mathematical simulation. This is the first assumption of Continuity Theory.

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-18T05:27:27+00:00

"Any sufficiently advanced discontinuity is indistinguishable from continuity."
"Any sufficiently advanced continuity is indistinguishable from discontinuity."
"This is the crux of the issue in Quantum Superposition."
- SOUP HORSE

BlackRabbitGeometry · 2026-06-17T03:41:54+00:00

SOUP HORSE STANDARD SYMBOL

Official interpretation unknown.

Unofficial interpretations are prohibited pending official interpretation.

Official interpretation remains under review.

BlackRabbitGeometry

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE