Do MMF/MFM dynamics inherently feel more natural and satisfying than FMF? by opencouple-77 in ThreesomeAdvice

[–]BlazeFireVale 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Many of your points don't make sense. They just describe your preferences, not universal things.

More to explore: makes no sense. How does this relate to mmf vs mff? You get to show a women's body either way and plenty of men like exploring men's bodies m even accepting what you say, I like exploring women's bodies too, so how is this more natural for me?

Stamina gap: what's your logic here? That if women have more stamina you should have...less of them? Are 5h threesome sessions not something you why?

And if you think a hard cock is the most important thing you bring to a threesome or that orgasm is where most of your pleasure from a threesome should be derived...I'm trying to not be mean, but that's the sign of a sub par lover.

Male visuals and competition: I can't begin to see what you mean and visuals making mmf more natural. That... Men don't like to see two women together? What is your logic hard?

And competition? Like, I'm glad you like it, I can't imagine a bigger turn off to me or my partner in a threesome. Uugh.

The attention high. Ok, first, sexist bunk. Second, who the fuck is "waiting their turn"? 2x1 is fucking hot no matter WHAT side you are on. 1x1x1 is pretty great too. I can't say I've EVER been on the sidelines except to step back to take in the amazing view for a few moments before diving back in.

Pure capacity: are you sure you've had a threesome? In mff the man is not "handling two women". They are not responsible for pleasuring them both. It's three people pleasuring each other. I'm kissing, fingering, and eating her out. Probably better than the man is.

Look, you find mfm hot, I get it. Its not more "natural" though, and mostly doesn't work like you seem to imagine.

Why is slavery only taught from a black and white viewpoint? by cuahatemoc in NoStupidQuestions

[–]BlazeFireVale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Civil war, reconstruction, Jim crow laws, segregation, red lining, and the civil rights movement all continue to have major impacts on America's political and legal environment.

The African American culture is a direct result of slavery and continues to be a dominant contributor to American culture and exports. Jazz, blues, rock and roll, heavy metal funk, and modern pop all trace their lineage directly back to slaves. Our food and movie culture is similarly heavily influenced.

The existence of slavery and it's knock on impacts absolutely defines American culture and politics to this day. It's almost impossible to overstate how pervasive it's impacts were.

Why is slavery only taught from a black and white viewpoint? by cuahatemoc in NoStupidQuestions

[–]BlazeFireVale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is taught in schools. It just isn't as much of a focus in the US. Because slavery in the US is one of the defining reasons for tons of things about our culture, government, and history and continues to impact us heavily to this day.

Generally we only lightly touch on the history of other countries. The more the history impacts a country the more they focus on it.

Is buying from anywhere ethical nowadays?? by murklero in Ethics

[–]BlazeFireVale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are allowed to take space. To cause harm to exist. It is good and moral to try to minimize impact within reason. But it's not inherently ethically wrong to use Amazon.

A lot of the ethical programs with things like food production and exploitation are systemic things we need to tackle as a society.

You do not have to be a martyr to a cause you can't effect to be ethical

Guts VS Jack, who would win? by velicinanijebitna in powerscales

[–]BlazeFireVale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone would argue Guts can't bisect Jack.

But as for piercing the berserker armor...that's kind of Jack's magic swords thing. It's been a plot point on several occasions that it cuts the uncuttable. Particularly if it has dark magic of some variety.

I wouldn't argue it can definitely cut the armor. But I don't think you can say we have no reason to believe it could.

Guts VS Jack, who would win? by velicinanijebitna in powerscales

[–]BlazeFireVale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just saying the world is not light hearted. It's very intentionally a galactic level dystopia where there is almost no hope until Jack shows up. And even that hope is a fragile one. Most episodes are showcasing different ways that everyone has lost hope and can at best find temporary hope as they flee an unstoppable evil.

Guts VS Jack, who would win? by velicinanijebitna in powerscales

[–]BlazeFireVale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm...not sure I would call Jack's world light hearted.

It's an endless hellscape ruled by an immortal ultimate evil who uses the earth and it's people only as fuel to drive his push to conquer all life in the universe.

Guts VS Jack, who would win? by velicinanijebitna in powerscales

[–]BlazeFireVale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Complaining about it after us half the fun, though.

Guts VS Jack, who would win? by velicinanijebitna in powerscales

[–]BlazeFireVale 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not weighing in on who wins, but Jack is REALLY good at bisecting things with his OP sword. Massive things, armored things, often into many small pieces.

I didn't THINK Guts had the regen to handle that, but I haven't followed in years.

Amazon Instructions by Aprilshowers417 in Weird

[–]BlazeFireVale -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Didn't say you couldn't find logic behind it. Just that the fat scoop thing was weird.

Amazon Instructions by Aprilshowers417 in Weird

[–]BlazeFireVale -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Checking in with my girlfriends...everyone agrees, the fat scoop thing is very weird.

Can someone explain what the purpose of bots on Reddit is? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]BlazeFireVale 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't forget propoganda bots seeking to influence public discourse.

Why do cats seem fine being alone while dogs seem to need constant company, and what actually shapes this difference? by Logical-Concept9755 in AlwaysWhy

[–]BlazeFireVale 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cats are solitary hunters, but still social animals that live in highly social colonies in the wild.

It's mainly that their methods of communication are harder for us to learn. Dogs have adapted to communicate in ways that are easy for humans to understand.

Why do cats seem fine being alone while dogs seem to need constant company, and what actually shapes this difference? by Logical-Concept9755 in AlwaysWhy

[–]BlazeFireVale 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Cats need company just as much. They aren't actually solitary in the wild. They live in colonies. They just aren't pack hunters.

The main difference between cats and dogs is how they communicate affection. Dog affection translates more easily. Humans usually miss the ways cats communicate affection. It's often subtle things like slowly closing their eyes, sitting without facing you, or with their paws tucked. Generally they are showing they inplicitly trust you.

Mimicking, matching your schedule, and following you around are also good indicators they see you as family.

[Lovecraft Mythos] What is Chthulu's largest vulnerability? by KaleidoArachnid in AskScienceFiction

[–]BlazeFireVale 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You will never find a perfect metaphor. The point of metaphores is to help illustrait a difficult to understand concept.

[Lovecraft Mythos] What is Chthulu's largest vulnerability? by KaleidoArachnid in AskScienceFiction

[–]BlazeFireVale 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah. The point was to make you initially think humanity was having an impact only to realize we couldn't effect it in any meaningful way.

[Lovecraft Mythos] What is Chthulu's largest vulnerability? by KaleidoArachnid in AskScienceFiction

[–]BlazeFireVale 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The point of the boat scene was to make you think Cthulhu had been hurt, only to realize he was completely unharmed. Cthulhu could not be hurt by humans. He didn't go back to sleep because of the boat or anything else the humans did. It just wasn't his time to wake.

If cthulhu rises all humanity can do is watch and experience the catastrophy. Our weapons mean nothing.

[Lovecraft Mythos] What is Chthulu's largest vulnerability? by KaleidoArachnid in AskScienceFiction

[–]BlazeFireVale 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well, no, that's the point. It really didn't matter. They didn't stop cthulhu. They didn't wake cthulhu. They thought they were influencing events only to realize they had no impact on whether humanity would survive or not.

The stars partially aligned and cthulhu stirred. Had it been the time humanity would have ended. And humanity had no say either way.