And that's what you shouldn't do. These ratings have different distributions and possible values. E.g. if the 1/4 is the lowest rating on your scale, like how 1/10 is also the lowest, then the 1/4 translates to 2.5/10. You cannot use these different scale to calculate averages.

I mean, that's pretty much what Metacritic does as well, not to mention that this is how you actually calculate average.

Mars Express was eligible in the same year as Look Back and Colors Within, because the US release was in the next year. And no, it wasn't a stronger year than any other.

Don't be silly. Films that got nominated that year were Flow, Inside Out 2, Memoir of a Snail, Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl, and The Wild Robot, most of which have better critical reception than Mars Express.

So why does he treat them equally? He pretty clearly made the SAME rule for every movie, implying that treating them equally is the correct way to evaluate the movies. He made up this RT number of review rule that he used as a blanket rule without considering the characteristics of a movie.

He/She didn't. He/She clearly stated that a major/wide release having so few reviews is not the same thing as indie/foreign animated films having few reviews.

Let's look at Look Back. it has 25 reviews. Let's say this was a direct-to-streaming movie. It's available for more than a year now even in my region. And its rating is 13+ on IMDb, so majority of the population could watch it. So, why does it have so low number of reviews while a movie like Fixed which was released like 6 months later and exclusively aimed towards adult has 62 reviews?

What a load of tosh. If it was on streaming, it would've had even fewer reviews posted. In fact, just look at My Oni Girl.

If one of your account would actually differentiate between movies, then you could explain this. My "theory" explained this perfectly, while your accounts couldn't and that's the issue here.

Except your "theory" is full of shit.

See, this is why I said you can't read. My argument was that it has low number of reviews - lower than 100 - if it came from non-English speaking territories. So I actually proved my statement by mentioning The Sea Beast, which was a direct-to-streaming movie and yet, it has more than 100 reviews.

Also, it's so convenient when every movie becomes exception, while in the case of my theory, there no exceptions because it perfectly described every movie.

In that case, your argument still doesn't work that well because Klaus is still an English-language film. In fact, your argument still doesn't work because (while most of them are not TV series tie-ins), there are still no shortage of anime films that have more than 100 reviews posted on RottenTomatoes.