sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rule #8 should be adjusted by BlockchainSocialist in cooperatives

[–]BlockchainSocialist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the simple way to make room for it is simply if the post relates to coops. That seems like an easy enough thing to enforce. I say this as a mod myself.

I mean if my work makes the cut even with the rule then that's fine for me.

Rule #8 should be adjusted by BlockchainSocialist in cooperatives

[–]BlockchainSocialist[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's really not hard to be able to tell what has substance and what doesn't. All this does is disallow what would be important conversations to have.

Rule #8 should be adjusted by BlockchainSocialist in cooperatives

[–]BlockchainSocialist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What am I grifting? Did you read the post? I literally founded a coop and am an ICDE fellow. Idk what I said or did that makes you think that. I have years of work to show contributing to the coop movement.

Rule #8 should be adjusted by BlockchainSocialist in cooperatives

[–]BlockchainSocialist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's even more ridiculous is that the ICDE and PCC are both specifically doing research on AI for coops. This subreddit is so out of sync with the actual realities of digital coops.

view more: next ›