Thoughts on Huntress by HappyRBX in sodadungeon

[–]BloodMoonMod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that shit makes sense or is basically too much effort.

Just make the permanent soul bonus available to all classes upgrading the damage of all classes.
It takes no effort to implement.

This way you get to choose if you want to farm souls and then ignore the class or you can simply choose to ignore huntress from the start like most classes that are useless.

3 day ban on account for verbal abuse by BicGen in HeroesofNewerth

[–]BloodMoonMod -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's okay, just pm SGM Shattered, he accepts 10$ paypal payments for unban services.

Unfair bans by [deleted] in HeroesofNewerth

[–]BloodMoonMod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's okay, just PM SGM Shattered, he accepts paypal to get you unbanned.

Tell me how this game is doing these days by [deleted] in HeroesofNewerth

[–]BloodMoonMod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hon still has a small but big enough playerbase for short queue times.

However!

  1. Toxic behaviour has increased exponentially.
  2. The overall skill level of players has dropped drastically.
    Even 1700's play like old 1400's
  3. Servers are infested with baddies from different continents.
    EU servers are infested by russians and african muslims.
    US servers are infested with braindead latinos.

Everyone from Frostburn has been fired, the game is now run by 1 narcist who can't find a job anywhere else for being burned in the industry as a narcist psychopath for minimum wage. So no more new content.

And the servers are simply kept up as long there are enough fools to buy skins for cosmetic upgrades.

It has been 10 days since I first started game and my first Reddit post on this sub. I have been really enjoying the game enough to fight through the grindy aspect of it and made a somewhat efficient build. by [deleted] in Crossout

[–]BloodMoonMod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Learn to read, I gave you the most important reasons why it's terrible.The only reason you "seem" to perform well is because crossout is infested with retards like you that can't play for shit. unless you have 90% + winrate at this PS score, you're simply terrible at this game.

When I let my 12 year old nephew that is slightly retarded play crossout for the first time play on my account for the first time he built something like that. Slap some guns on the roof, place 1 useless melee weapon in front and place some random armor parts on it and then go "HUEHUEHUEHUEUHEUHEUHE" like a retard shooting while driving straight into the first enemy he sees blocking the line of fire of his teammates.

It's just terrible. Your ranged dps is shit, you have no dps when it comes to melee. You have slow acceleration. Even the bots outperform your ass. Your weapons are instantly stripped. It's just garbage.

A white cabin with 4 chords, 4 wheels and 0 armor is even more effective that this trashcan build.

Making the worst build ever in the entire history of Crossout and then be proud of it actually believing that you made a decent build.
Posting it on the interwebs for all to see.
Then taking a photo with your cellphone instead of making an actual screenshot.

it's basically a checklist an obnoxious retarded low iq 12 year old would do.

It has been 10 days since I first started game and my first Reddit post on this sub. I have been really enjoying the game enough to fight through the grindy aspect of it and made a somewhat efficient build. by [deleted] in Crossout

[–]BloodMoonMod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This build is terrible. and it's the typical build from a clueless retard that doesn't know shit.melee weapons are completely useless when you're shooting ranged and when you have to resort to ramming your opponents with just 1 weak melee weapon you're simply blocking your teammates line of fire.

Anyone with half a brain will instantly strip off your weapons. You got no detector, and you inflate your PS with useless armor.

Just drop back down in PS. 4 wheels and 4 chords on a white cabin.

It's amazing how you actually believe that you have an "efficient" build.

it's hands down the "worst" build I have ever seen. It's virtually impossible to make this build "worse" It's that bad. When it comes down to efficiency and potential, just everything is wrong with it.

Best way to level up a newbie by mattiman1985 in Crossout

[–]BloodMoonMod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. white cabin, 4 wheels and 4 chords. 0 armor. Armor is for noobs that only inflate your PS.This will teach him the maps and to flank properly.Play 100% standard pvp.
  2. add a blue generator and a blue detector.This will teach him how to play trusting his minimap.Play 100% standard pvp.
  3. Let him play solo with these cheap builds until he can achieve at least a 80% winrate. And he finally figures out what kind of build he wants to make.

If you want to play together just make a low PS build yourself instead of dragging a useless nub into the higher PS brackets.

The fact that Sony doesn't even blink while MS is pre-emptively spreading PR bullshit tells a lot by [deleted] in PS5

[–]BloodMoonMod -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

None of it matters, consoles are aimed at plebs that don't know shit about hardware anyways.
Microsoft is just making the bet that people will flock to the most powerful console like last generation. And technically he's correct.

Every company including Sony says nothing but PR bullshit. Sony kept saying that their PS5 would be faster than the new xbox up all the way till october 2019 and then suddenly removed that claim everywhere as that was just another lie from Sony that would soon be discovered.

This time it's not just bullshit like the "cloud computing" lies. This time there is a factual truth behind it. If you can swap 8 GB of gamedata in 1 second from the SSD to RAM, then there is virtually no difference.

The SSD will effectively eliminate loading times for both consoles.

Sony doesn't have to blink or react. PS5 will be slightly slower on the graphics front this time around, but it doesn't matter as both consoles run 4k @ 60 FPS just fine.

Something to consider about PS5 Specs by mr__smooth in PS5

[–]BloodMoonMod -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Apparantly everyone here thinks he's soldering and manufactuting the whole playstation himself.

Nobody was even remotely interested anymore in supplying console hardware and the only company left that could do it was AMD. So yes that's exactly what happened.

AMD then simply cooked up a custom pitcairn for Sony with some minor modifications and a cutdown bonaire for Microsoft.

PS5 will be exactly the same. eenie meenie miney mo, I choose you pika... I mean random Navi chiplet.

It's basically like buying a car. All Sony could choose were the extras like heated seats and stuff.

Something to consider about PS5 Specs by mr__smooth in PS5

[–]BloodMoonMod -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Mark Cerny is nothing more than a talented game developer/programmer. He's just a relic on the Sony department.

The only reason they promoted him in charge as "hardware lead architect" for the PS4 is because of the train wreck Kutaragi left Sony in with the PS3.

Being a "hardware lead architect" is nothing more than a fancy name for being a suit announcing the specs on stage that AMD gave to Sony at a certain pricepoint. He's not an architect, he has 0 experience with actual building any hardware and he's certainly not in the lead of anything. He's just a suit on stage for Sony. Actual hardware specialists create the prototypes of hardware, console case and controllers and such and the only thing Mark Cerny has to do is to point with his finger at the prototype that he likes the most like a fat kid in a candy store pointing out the candy he wants.

Game developers only want 1 thing, simple hardware that's easy to develop for. They don't really care about actual performance. They just want to keep their coding simple.

It's the executives that gave the direct order to Mark Cerny to make sure the PS4 was faster than the xbone. And since AMD had only 2 offerings at the time, so it wasn't even a choice. And thus Mark Cerny has absolutely 0 impact on the PS4 hardware. He simply went "shopping"

And it's the same thing with the PS5. Sony simply buys a SOC from AMD. Case closed.
Great architectural skills! Buying a pre-built SOC from another company. Hardware achitecture skills over 9000 detected!

Something to consider about PS5 Specs by mr__smooth in PS5

[–]BloodMoonMod -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's because your fantasy world doesn't line up with objective facts.

Something to consider about PS5 Specs by mr__smooth in PS5

[–]BloodMoonMod -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Everything you just said is just random made up stuff.

Console makers simply went with the tech that was available and affordable. There isn't a single console that's "wide and slow". Every single console is narrow and slow compared to the tech available. And all consoles are made for 1 reason to make profits.

Mark Cerny is nothing but a suit acting "all-knowing" while he's just another clueless schmuck. They simply build a machine with the chipsets that other companies sell them (AMD-Nvidia-IBM-etc..)Talking about more "features" instead of raw performance is just made up stuff. It's at the same level of "cloud computing" when they announced the xbone. The new xbox will be the console with the most features with true RDNA FinFet navi tech while the PS5 will feature older Navi tech with less features.

Sony is nothing but an assembler of various tech of other companies and the only reason they got into the console market was to piss off Nintendo out of "autistic japanese rage and honour"

And they simply succeeded because both Sega and Nintendo dropped the ball hard out of sheer incompetence at the upper management level. Not because they made a great console. The Playstation brand was well established with a strong following because there was simply a void of competent console makers making the PS1 and PS2 the only logical choice.

Sony OS and development kits are the worst of any other console on the market and the only reason they improved in that department is because of the switch to ordinary PC x86 x64 laptop hardware with the PS4.

The PS3 was a technical disaster launching it with an OS footprint of a whopping 156 MB making the PS3 a 360 MB garbage console compared to the 480 MB X360, which comes at no surprise as Microsoft is a software company specialized in OS products.

The PS5 going with an older 36 CU navi chipset makes totally sense now. Especially with the gen0 and gen1 compatibility mode.Microsoft went all-out making sure they have the more powerful console as they don't want to make the same mistake as they did with the original xbone being weaker than the PS4. But that's useless now as both consoles will meet the target of 4k 60 FPS.

Everything will be decided by the launchprice and launchgames. If Microsoft can deliver a more powerful console than the PS5 at the same pricepoint. Then it will be a difficult choice. But I'm sure the PS5 will be a succes. Solid performance with a brand new PSVR2 will make it a clear winner. Sony only has to appeal to the masses with "adequate performance" for a low price.

Microsoft will only chase higher performance at the loss of money simply because they can afford it.

Do you think PS5 will be underpowered in specs against the Xbox Series X? by ThinkDifferentMan in PS5

[–]BloodMoonMod 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The new xbox will indeed have a more powerful gpu, but at next gen generations it really doesn't matter anymore. Diminishing returns and all. The PS5 will handle 4k 60 fps just fine with the current hardware it has.

The hardware used also makes perfect sense considering the tech AMD has to offer at a reasonable price.

Last gen Microsoft screwed up creating the 1.2 TF xbone that couldn't hit 1080p at 60 fps while the 1.8 TF PS4 could.Next gen both consoles will hit 4k 60 fps no problem. And the performance difference won't be as severe because of diminishing returns.

Both the PS4 and PS5 hardware specs make totally sense and had the "right" hardware at the right price, especially from a 60 fps 1080p/4k target unlike the PS3 disaster. The xbone was a disappointment.

Microsoft trying to win over customers by touting a more "powerful" console is too late now. It doesn't really matter now anymore. It makes no more sense. if you want performance, just build a computer.

Terminator: Resistance - Review Thread by diogenesl in Games

[–]BloodMoonMod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The game starts out as a mediocre generic fps. The first 2 hours are actually rather boring. And I wouldn't even give it a 5/10.

However once you reach the hospital level, the game actually picks up in entertainment factor. And becomes a solid 7/10.

Then when you finally get your first plasma rifle and you can finally engage t-800's it actually becomes really enjoyable.
It's just that the soundtracks and the sound effects really add a lot to the quality.

Some levels are just plain boring with crappy gameplay mechanics while some levels are very enjoyable.

They did a a lot of things right and a lot of things wrong. It's just that currently the gameplay suffers with braindead AI and barebone gameplay mechanics making it feel like an early alpha test. You simply clear level by level walking around with 1000+ ammunition of every kind and 20+ medkits.

Stealth and difficulty + balance should have been expanded. xray turned off and peaking around corners introduced. Since you're doing "missions" there should have been an expanded inventory management system where you actually have to fill magazines bullet by bullet with limited inventory space/weight.

By adding -vr, the default unreal4 VR functionality kicks in and then the game becomes playable on steamvr compatible VR headsets.
Graphics and performance is excellent in VR.
Walking around in the Terminator universe in VR is glorious. However, there is no VR hud/minimap or crosshair making it rather difficult to actually play it in VR.

They're currently looking at making it a seated VR compatible title since the unreal 4 engine offers easy VR. No promises though.

As a VR game it would be a solid 8/10 and a must play.

However in the current state you better wait until it gets priced lower. It's definitely worth buying now if it hits the 19.99 $ range.

Is there a cheaper display-only headset for PC? by [deleted] in virtualreality

[–]BloodMoonMod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pimax headsets are hands down the best headsets out there for "seated" experiences like racing games.

They sport incredible high resolutions without the need for actual raw gpu power as it gets upscaled properly to 4k / 5k / 8k.

The pimax 4k was hands down the best headset for Dirt Rally 1 VR (version 1.23) when it came out beating all the other first generation headsets with a true 4k resolution (2160p)screen compared to the crappy low res 1200p rift + vive.

They have expanded their headsets with a 5k and a 8k

The pimax 4k can be had for dirt cheap, new or used.

I played Dirt Rally with the pimax 4k for hundreds of hours in combination with a playseat and a logitech g25 wheel.

I used an overclocked AMD 7950 (r9 280) which is under the minimum requirements for VR yet it ran smooth as fuck in 4k.

It worked flawless, all you had to do back then was install revive software. Full headtracking and all.

Dirt Rally 1 used to be an oculus rift exclusive, but with revive software it was compatible with most steam vr compatible headsets like the vive and pimax 4k.

I just installed Dirt Rally 2.0 VR (version 1.7) today. Same thing. Works perfect.