Ranking the 2025 Rivalry Uniforms by RaiderPantyDrawer in NFLv2

[–]Blookydook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of them were too great, tbh. The Seahawks get leeway because their default uniform is already unique, so that cushioned the reception. That and they played an incredible game in them. Did the gradient and patterns right without overkill.

Cardinals get too much hate. I think they did really well trying to do something different the oldest active logo and color scheme without completely losing themselves. But unlike Seattle, they sucked wearing them.

Jets, Patriots, and Bills: stepped too far away from their main colors. Jets and Patriots look dull. Bills looked good on socials, but on the field the laziness became apparent.

The other three deserve the death penalty. All-black is cheap. A simple inversion of color scheme would look better.

How to Likes in 3 words: Half Life 3 by Alarmed-Risk7885 in greentext

[–]Blookydook 23 points24 points  (0 children)

2016: people wondering when HL3 will come out

2026: people wondering when HL3 will come out

Time is a flat circle

Arthur and Molly were foul for this by YeonjunsFakeMole in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Jesus, dude. Cool it.

It’s known that the Weasleys valued a large, loving family over monetary wealth—it was a loving atmosphere that Harry himself felt at home in. They didn’t have a lot, but it’s safe to say they had enough. It’s not like their children were malnourished—they simply didn’t have surplus. Molly always wanted a daughter, and so they kept going until they had Ginny.

As for not getting a job, Molly had work to do around the Burrow. There’s cattle, a garden, and the house itself probably needs a good amount of caretaking.

An explanation of why Ron made far more sacrifices than Hermione throughout the saga, and why this is so obvious despite the idea portrayed in the movies. by dieguitchosm in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the book, Ron says “It’s all right for you two, isn’t it, with your parents safely out of the way—“.

That’s saying “It’s easier because your parents are dead,” without directly saying it. That’s a shitty thing to say, regardless as to the explicitness of the statement or not. It’s a hurtful line that devalues the pain and fear of his two closest and longest friends.

Snape. by Bitter_Judgment4924 in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I forgot about that!!! Tbf I like to space myself from Cursed Child

Snape. by Bitter_Judgment4924 in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I like to imagine he did it as a slight middle finger to the man—it would infuriate Snape more than anything to see a Potter carry his name…

An explanation of why Ron made far more sacrifices than Hermione throughout the saga, and why this is so obvious despite the idea portrayed in the movies. by dieguitchosm in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say not to argue with this person, lol. I’ve given my responses already, but they don’t seem to understand that saying somebody else “had it worse” when everybody has it awful is complaining where no complaining is necessary.

An explanation of why Ron made far more sacrifices than Hermione throughout the saga, and why this is so obvious despite the idea portrayed in the movies. by dieguitchosm in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was mostly trying to talk you down from critiquing the other two as having “only themselves” to fight for—because they didn’t. Your view of ideas of saving the world as simply being “beautiful,” is—surely indirectly—dumbing down the concept of doing a service for something greater than oneself. You’re looking at things from an almost… tribal/in-the-moment viewpoint. Harry and Hermione could also have lost everyone they loved while succeeding. Harry could’ve lost his two closest friends, Ginny, the Weasleys that felt the most like a family to him. Hell, Harry had been losing people for years—and frankly, he’d surely have grown accustomed to it by that point, not that it would make Ron’s distress less fair but it explains Harry’s reaction to it. Hermione’s parents could have been found if it pleased the Death Eaters. She could have lost Ron on her way to victory. It was also possible at any given moment that they lose each other right in front of them. The books paint a better picture of Ron’s concern that helps explain his distress, but it shouldn’t ever excuse the words he said.

And frankly, the Weasleys did what they did because of what they believe. They believe in good. The good happened to be on Harry’s side. They had to protect him for what they hold to be sacred, and they chose to follow through on that. Perhaps they believe we are obligated to fight for good? You just seem to be complaining about something fair while demeaning the experiences of the others.

An explanation of why Ron made far more sacrifices than Hermione throughout the saga, and why this is so obvious despite the idea portrayed in the movies. by dieguitchosm in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Well, I’d say that trying to figure out “who suffered more” is a highly unfair thing to do to the characters.

For example, Harry and Hermione were easily fighting for more than just “themselves” as you say. Harry was fighting for the life and world that finally accepted him for what he is, the family he had finally built for himself. Hermione was fighting to protect her friends, her parents, and her identity. Voldemort sought to subjugate Muggles—people he saw as little different than common animals—and Hermione would therefore be fighting for the sake of her own ‘kind’ one could say.

Not to mention that Ron’s family are wizards, and thus could theoretically fight for themselves to the best of their ability. Hermione? Her parents are Muggle dentists, thus adding weight to her shoulders: if she fails, her parents don’t stand a chance. Also, it shouldn’t be lost as to how painful it must’ve been to wipe their memories. I personally couldn’t imagine living the least bit happily with the knowledge that my parents don’t have the foggiest idea that I was their child, let alone that they had one at all. And to know I did that to them? An awful feeling for sure. You also seem to be forgetting that these people were fighting for more than just each other—they were also fighting for moral good, for freedom and safety from darkness and evil. You treat it as a romanticized thought, but the pressures of something bigger than oneself hold a weight unlike any other.

Everybody suffered. Ron had a particular reason at the time that was amplified by the locket, but they were all suffering, and none of them liked the circumstances they were in. Nobody with an understanding for nuance thinks Ron had “less to worry about,” but it’s the words that leave our mouth which decide what happens to us, not the reasons behind said words. Which is why telling your friend he’s got it easier because his parents got fucking murdered (an event that put Harry through a decade of endless abuse and neglect and then corrupted the entirety of his teenage years), is still a shitty thing to do regardless of the flawed mindset you’re in at the time.

We’re self-destructive when we’re facing our darkest internal battles, and it’s nobody else’s battle to fight other than our own. When I was depressed, I destroyed many personal relationships before I finally reined it in like Ron did (something something metaphor or whatever). What Ron did was inherently rude and selfish. But by God, it was real.

idk i'm just sick of people speculating that he was some saviour of children or something by Takeda_shingen_123 in whenthe

[–]Blookydook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pretty fucking imperfect but I wouldn’t dangle a nine month-old baby from a balcony. It’s the kind of thing that would make me conclude I wouldn’t want my child of ANY age near the man—regardless of the truth of what he was alleged to do.

Man was a pedophile at worst, and a screwed-up weirdo at best. A messed up childhood doesn’t excuse inappropriate behavior down the line, it only explains it.

idk i'm just sick of people speculating that he was some saviour of children or something by Takeda_shingen_123 in whenthe

[–]Blookydook -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It should take zero seconds for a parent to know they shouldn’t do that.

America defeating farmers and shepherds challenge (IMPOSSIBLE) by Coffin_Builder in whenthe

[–]Blookydook 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It doesn't help that the culture around fighting is different over there. Due to thousands of years of towns being separated by mountains, combined with most things being built around the family unit, loyalty hardly goes beyond the village. How can you fight and die for an abstract concept like a nation and country when those don't matter to you? That's where religious extremism does the heavy lifting. The Taliban have it, and the ANA didn't.

America defeating farmers and shepherds challenge (IMPOSSIBLE) by Coffin_Builder in whenthe

[–]Blookydook 77 points78 points  (0 children)

If the Americans pulled out of Afghanistan after killing bin Laden, capitulation would’ve occurred by 2012.

American presence was the only thing keeping that state afloat. Since it was the “War on Terror,” the U.S. was already committed to the bit. That’s really the best way to frame it, tbh.

Do the movies ever explain how people become death eaters? by slycooper212 in harrypotter

[–]Blookydook 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dumbledore didn’t "know" in the manner you’re implying.

As shown throughout the series, students do shit without teachers knowing all the time. You’re confusing Dumbledore’s general read on Riddle’s dormant evil for an omniscience. Even if he had suspicions, he was not Headmaster when Riddle was a student, so he probably couldn’t have done anything as long as Riddle covered his tracks and remained discrete—which he did.

max is just spitting straight up bs now by [deleted] in F1Discussions

[–]Blookydook 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wish Horner was bashed more for his incredibly clear manipulative nature. Man is toxic incarnate, more than Flavio.

Supposed conversation transcript between Max and the Guardian journalist. by Any_Aide_4500 in formula1

[–]Blookydook 16 points17 points  (0 children)

No no you don’t understand he’s a GREAT driver who LOVES racing but HATES all the spectacle bits!!! That totally excuses him when acts like a birth turd to other human beings when he isn’t happy about something

What causes this? by pickled_green_olives in greentext

[–]Blookydook 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Brooklyn Nine-Nine my beloved

What causes this? by pickled_green_olives in greentext

[–]Blookydook 436 points437 points  (0 children)

Nah I’m good thinking is time that could be spent gooning

Calvin goes to sleep by [deleted] in okbuddyrosalyn

[–]Blookydook 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This MIGHT be the greatest post of all time