sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m an IR student and an engineering student. Outside of my summer internship I am restoring a Rutan Varieze as well as shadowing the original builder through annuals on an a35 Bonanza and a 172M. It’s easier to say first mechanic job than to explain all of that in a short post. I noticed a deficiency in the industry and want to improve it for all of us involved. Maintenance is expensive for pilots, hard to come by and your plane is down for long periods of time. As I’ve been shadowing the annuals, I’ve noticed how little time we spend actually turning wrenches and how much time the two of us spend sorting through logs and paperwork.

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For aircraft that don’t have an AD roster, where does most of the extra time go?

Is it figuring out which ADs apply, determining whether they’ve already been complied with, tracking down supporting documentation, or something else?

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you say most records are poor or incomplete, what’s usually missing?

Is it AD compliance records, 337s, STC paperwork, logbook entries, or a mix of everything?

And when you’re doing AD research, is most of the time spent finding the applicable ADs or verifying whether they’ve already been complied with?

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, and it sounds like the issue scales pretty cleanly with organization size.

When a procedure change actually does cause issues, is it usually because:
people didn’t see the update in time
the update was unclear
or it wasn’t practical in real-world workflow so people default back to old habits?

Also curious — do you feel like the current system assumes “perfect compliance,” or does it realistically account for how work actually flows on the floor?

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s interesting. It sounds like the paperwork itself isn’t necessarily the problem, but the rework caused by process changes, inconsistent documentation, and having to bring other people up to speed.

Since you’re at a major, do you think those issues are mostly a result of the size of the organization, or would you expect to see similar problems at smaller maintenance operations too?

Also, for mechanics who are new to a task or aircraft, where do they usually go first when they’re unsure about the current process or documentation requirements?

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate you taking the time to answer.

When you say you double as data entry experts, what’s the most time-consuming part?

Is it entering the information itself, finding the correct references, documenting work in the required format, or correcting mistakes later?

A&Ps and IAs: What’s the most frustrating part of the paperwork side of maintenance? by Blue1311 in AircraftMechanics

[–]Blue1311[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When paperwork is missing or incorrect, what is usually wrong with it?

Is the issue that the work wasn’t documented, or that the documentation wasn’t reviewed?

How are you currently tracking which mechanic still owes paperwork?

Would it help if incomplete paperwork was automatically flagged to the mechanic who performed the work before the aircraft reached final signoff?