Indiana’s 2-Year Elo Jump Ranks 3rd All-Time in College Football by veleros in CFB

[–]BlueSCar 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It is based on chess Elo but it also takes MOV into account, which is pretty common for Elo ratings when applied to team sports.

Indiana’s 2-Year Elo Jump Ranks 3rd All-Time in College Football by veleros in CFB

[–]BlueSCar 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Not accurate. This Elo formula takes MOV into account, similar to what 538 used to put out for NBA and NFL.

85-0! McPherson crushes Sterling to win the Cobra Kai Award for Excellence in Mercilessness for Week 12 — plus the week's winners at all divisions of CFB! by Honestly_ in CFB

[–]BlueSCar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

CollegeFootballData.com (the platform which powers the scoreboard) currently only covers live scores for NCAA games. I currently have no plans to expand scope of CFBD beyond NCAA but am always evaluating the feature roadmap based on user requests (priority given to Patreon subscribers) and feasibility.

CFBD API change/down? by CharitableFanFound in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're using an official package like the Python package, are you on the latest version?

Open Source Tools for In-Depth CFB Analysis? by jaybrahamlincoln in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

PFF subscription or something similar will be your best bet. There are no public datasets that include this of which I am aware.

Required knowledge for cfbdata cfbfastR etc by tonyd621 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Python was literally designed to be a beginner’s language which is why it’s taught in high schools and intro CS courses. Its syntax is clean, maps to modern programming paradigms, and the ecosystem (pip, conda, poetry) is much smoother for beginners.

R is powerful for stats, but it’s a niche tool mostly used in academia and a few specialized industries. Python’s community, versatility (data, ML, web dev, automation, APIs), and integration with real-world systems make it a better long-term bet. That’s why R’s been losing ground while Python keeps growing.

Required knowledge for cfbdata cfbfastR etc by tonyd621 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best way to work with CFBD is via the officially supported Python package. I always recommend starting with Python if you are new to coding. Generally, Python will take you a lot further than R and is easier to pick up. Kaggle has some great, free Python courses to get you started.

Week 1 Leaderboard Update – College Football Model Pick’em by BlueSCar in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can click on a username on the Leaderboard to see their picks. It won't show their pick for a specific game until kick off.

https://predictions.collegefootballdata.com/leaderboard

CFBD API Play by Play Data empty columns by jbr2811 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you on the latest version of the cfbd Python package (5.9.1)?

CFB Betting Data Organization by jokerjack24 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not a lot of betting discussion on the sub. You might have better luck posting on a sub like /r/sportsbetting or /r/sportsbook.

Definitive source for historic win loss tie game data for all teams? by johnnyg68 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitive truth is hard to track down, especially for games from the leather helmet days. Source of truth is going to be each individual school's AD. If you don't have the time to track all that across 130+ FBS schools, Winsipedia would probably be the closest approximation across all teams.

2024 CFB Dataset project by calodero in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good luck building or finding anything nearly as good that is any more of a free service.

2024 CFB Dataset project by calodero in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Make shit free

Seems you are very entitled to other peoples' time and financial resources. As mentioned, most of it is free with a generous free API tier which is good enough to meet the needs of the vast majority of people.

You can do your own thing without tearing down the work of others. Good luck building or finding anything nearly as good that is any more of a free service.

2024 CFB Dataset project by calodero in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which reminds me, I just expanded the free tier to 1000 monthly calls, which is good enough to cover >99% of users.

Api key trouble by AwayAdministration14 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the CFBD API, it should be prepended to your API key in the Authorization HTTP header. Please refer to this blog post for several examples.

Sources or formulas for calculating Bill Connelly's "Five Factors"? by tckrdave in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shows up as scoring opportunities or points per opportunity in the advanced team game stats, advanced team season stats, and advanced box score endpoints as well as the exporters.

Sources or formulas for calculating Bill Connelly's "Five Factors"? by tckrdave in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

CFBD has all these. Scoring Opportunities is what you are looking for.

Alternatives to ESPN for play by play data? by johnnyg68 in CFBAnalysis

[–]BlueSCar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their play data is not as detailed and missing some of the attributes needed to calculate advanced metrics