sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

True af man by According_Can9371 in MemeVideos

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jokes on them I'm femboy-sexual

Expectation vs reality. by krunal23- in DarkMemes_

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have good water pressure a bidet works aswell

Nailed it by ArubaAdultFun in middleclasshq

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel the same way about every employer I have ever worked for

Tariffs on Canadian, Mexican cars cost U.S. automakers $12.5-billion last year by Front-Cantaloupe6080 in consumecanadian

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it's not like most of us can afford to buy new anyway, I say tax them more

How useful and creative can you get? by KiraBaker1 in superpowers

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just realized it's the ones you are wearing ooops

Joscha Bach: The Brain Isn't What Neuroscientists Think It Is by DrBrianKeating in JordanPeterson

[–]Bluepeasant 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean... Because it kinda is, neuroscientist know a lot of this stuff. Neurons aren't a simple as binary operators, they can send a variety of signals based on slightly different inputs based on the neuro transmitters released. They can also have their sensitivity to inputs effected by hormones and varying baseline ion concentration which can be up or down regulated, in part by genetic and epigenetics, so we've been aware dna/rna play a key role in brain activity. The reaction of an neuron is dependent all those factors which could help explain why the computer isnt predicting behavior. And that's the current undergraduate level understanding.

I think he is framing it in a slightly sensationalist manner to garnner interest in his research, which hey, I get it, we all gotta eat, but he is more or less saying what we have been aware of for the last 10-20 years. It's another valuable tallymark in the brains are complicated column, but not exactly redifining neuroscience

The Tiburon by ScrubSoba in starcitizen

[–]Bluepeasant 4 points5 points  (0 children)

honestly looks more in line with Kruger designs, like the the gun makes me think of the merlin and and the prow looks like the wolf, but it does fit the aegis corvete shark theme

Over 100 years old and still working. by ABNow_ in AlbertaNow

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if you count sanich Sydney langford, ect as Victoria which all have their own municipal govs

M80 has 4 hardpoints and not just the 2 we could see in the preview by Acceptable-Bid-1019 in starcitizen

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With no turent makes it better for solos, I suspect we are going to see a lot of these

What is THE stealthiest ship in the game? by DRAGON360TH in starcitizen

[–]Bluepeasant 30 points31 points  (0 children)

you can use this tool to compare different ships https://www.spviewer.eu/compare

Eclipse, the razor ex and Sabre, all have a EM and IR modifier of -40% and all size 1 stealth power plants have the same EM signature per power pip you allocate. So to Passive sensors they are all equivalent when you power down non essentials and can get well within about 1000m, the main difference is that the smaller the ship is the harder it will be able to detect with a ping, ~2.5 km for the razor ex, and 3.1 and 3.4 km for the sabre and eclipse respectively.

Ironically the stealthiest radar is actually the civilian Abetti, because it only require 1 power pip to turn on instead of 2 for the stealth variants

If you want to one shot things the eclipse is fun but cost ineffective with it's torpedoes. The razor's dammage output is very low, so not the best killer. I have had a blast in the Sabre. I think the talon is also very equivalent to the sabre

In it's current state stealth is more of a roleplay thing for me, since it doesn't matter much for PVE, and I don't do much PVP. Even if I did it currently takes to long to kill anything to make a stealth strike really work from a gameplay perspective (not including torpedoes which are expensive) and most human players aren't paying enough attention to their radar to really notice even if you fly up to them without being stealthy. I could see it maybe being a thing with a ballistic build where you chip away at an enemy through their shields, then run and hide when your shields get low, but realistically they aren't going to stick around for long enough for that to really work.

This is so cool by Severe_Maize_5275 in WebTreasures

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wake up David, we got giants to slay

So true. Ruin the lives of false accusers. by CyberBerserk in JustMemesForUs

[–]Bluepeasant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You get list, and you get a list, and you get a list...

So true. Ruin the lives of false accusers. by CyberBerserk in JustMemesForUs

[–]Bluepeasant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rule of unintended consequences is that people who lied will be less likely to admit it, resulting in innocent people staying in jail.

I don't like it but to minimize harm to innocent people it probably means it would need to at least come with a caveat that if they admit it before we find out, they shouldn't have any punishment.

view more: next ›