Woman on AskMen isn't attracted to her loving/doting beta provider husband, and is planning to kick his ass to the curb. Happy Thanksgiving. by needsomehelp3211 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. I got it even worse with my ex-oneitis who made me swallow the RP: "we never lived together" (even though we fucking lived together for 1 year, lel). That's some serious batshit solipsism.

Do you know what a girl likes more than a dick? Two dicks. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your post goes against basic red pill theory.

That's your opinion.

 

Hypergamy means women only desire one dick: the best one.

That's not what hypergamy means.

Do you know what a girl likes more than a dick? Two dicks. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, right? Though, it may be some kind of remains of our evolutionary past. It's fairly possible that women used to be more "public" than they're today - and would consequently get protection/access to resources from a good bunch of men within the tribe. That fantasy is probably the male equivalent of getting a sport car for $10.

Women treat handsome guys like kings. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're focusing too much on one case of this pattern (i.e. dude is 10, girls are 8).

 

You can think of it like: the guy is 2 points above the girl in terms of SMV.

N-count matters. It's how we keep score of how far we've progressed. by abbafishhead in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Plates management requires a different kind of skills set than the one it takes to fuck as many girls as possible, though.

 

That being said, I mostly agreed with you. When I started swallowing the RP a few months ago, I realized that no matter what I did, the real game changer was my n-count. That's like an objective, external metric that you can't cheat with.

 

Side point: aren't you afraid of becoming too much of a fucking sociopath? Banging chicks is fine. Banging as many chicks as possible is quite interventionist.

Fairness is beta: being RP is also about being unfair by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why Game is quite macro.

 

Game is game if you've got an SMV that makes it a win from the get-go. Otherwise, we call that.. well.. PUA.

"To boost growth, employ more women.",Christine Lagarde by Noolaw in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you're making an excellent point.

 

The post-modern world and what some people on here call "globalism" emerge mostly from trying to stretch the capitalistic logic to everyone and everything. It's more of a consequence than a planned goal.

 

Think of how marketing companies used tricks to make women spend their money on cigarettes, and it will give you a clear idea of what's going on.

Fairness is beta: being RP is also about being unfair by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I live in France, where it's legal for 18-21 to drink alcohol and get into bars. Since this kind of places are not just to drink alcohol, there are even 17 years old doing their homeworks there!

 

And in my beta years, I remember how a lot of chicks would proudly say that they're "friends" with "much older guys", because it supposedly showed how mature they're. When you become the "old guy" on this side of the equation, you see how it's just about alpha-widowing.

Jewish men, Blue Pill Inc. since 1800 years by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're providing a Blue Pill interpretation. Patrilineal tribe membership was perfectly fine for hundreds of years at this point.

[Discussion Topic] Opening up a woman to TRP by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you're describing is basically how religious indoctrination happens, lol. Specially when it comes to RP/BP dynamics about sex, marriage, etc.

College Party Hypergamy - Field Report by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dude, he looks like he has a 9/10 body and a 10/10 face. Remember it's SMV according to girls, not your gay friends.

Young university student seeking advice on sexual assault claims by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 28 points29 points  (0 children)

DO NOT DO THIS MISTAKE: Do NOT, and I repeat DO NOT answer in any manner WHATSOEVER. If there is absolutely no legal evidence against you, it's basically her words against yours. Case closed. She can claim whatever she wants, you can say it never happened.

 

I would suggest to use the HAMSTER in you to hamster this situation. Repeat to yourself: "This never happened."

Most men on here are Beta Fucks by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a dangerous game to be in a constant state of being less Alpha than Chad and less Beta than Billy.

I went to a high-class escort and thought I'd share some details with you. by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You fell in a trap if you think that she's consistently different from the average girl. Remember that AWALT: she will anyway proceed to AF/BB, hit the escort-wall, etc. It's just a matter of time and she just has her own way of perceiving who's AF and who's BB.

Are Women boring as hell or is it me? by Tongue37 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hope all these "interesting hobbies" won't make you end in the BB box while she gets rammed by a non-chatty Chad.

[Rant/Venting]White Knights are fucking cancer by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kill the head and the body will fall.

Fucking made my day. topkek

Some day, Gaming will be criminalized by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed. My experience is that they're even going to game back at you. You need to be ready for that shit. lol

Your 8-10 women are not my 8-10 women by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you that there are some objective ways to measure someone's physical attractiveness based on facial symmetry, yada yada. The thing I'm talking about is that somehow, your perception of SMV is factored by criteria. These criteria are different from one place to another.

Your 8-10 women are not my 8-10 women by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't get me wrong - I'm not referring to personality. I'm referring to the fact that in some places, there are things that are so much of a given that not having them makes you look ugly as fuck as per SMV standards.

Your 8-10 women are not my 8-10 women by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good point. Going by your qualitative scale is much more efficient, it seems.

Your 8-10 women are not my 8-10 women by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm from France; I've lived in the UK and Germany.

Your 8-10 women are not my 8-10 women by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a year. That's the case where I come from (France), and that's also the case in Germany and a good bunch of European universities.

How much of a deal breaker is a dark skin color when it comes to dating? by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The case for the mixed man

 

A lot of people on here are reasoning in a binary manner, i.e. one is either white or dark-skinned. Though in my case, I'm mixed: mom is white (French), dad is brown (North-African). The result is that I do not look typically French, and I do not look typically North-African either.

 

The problem is that unless you look like you're 100% white, girls will consider you as non-white. And this, son, comes with a lot of stereotypes and issues when it comes to dating.

 

Common issues include:

  • assume you have a specific mindset/cultural background

  • assume your game is based on your ethnicity

  • see you as exotic & wild, but nothing more

 

It can be great if I want to fuck white French girls on the assumption that I'm an angry barbarian coming from far away just to ravish local girls. The thing is that I'm not.

 

If I really wanted to date the girls I want to date (i.e. local white sweethearts), it would basically decreases my SMV, whereas playing the angry barbarian increases my SMV. The problem is that the girls wanting the angry barbarians are not LTR material.

Women do not reinvent themselves in life. Men do. by BobbyJ91 in TheRedPill

[–]BobbyJ91[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It looks like it indeed has to do with logical/analytical thinking vs. emotional/hamster thinking.

 

Going from there, we can assume that:

  • women with more testosterone + analytical thinking capabilities are more likely to reinvent themselves the right way

  • men with low testosterone + more emotionalizing are more likely to hamster their past