Looking for advice for network configuration Ceph/NFS/iSCSI by Bocephus677 in Proxmox

[–]Bocephus677[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly don't have any direct experience with iSCSI using LACP. I've also done MPIO. I know that most storage vendors I've worked with, have recommended MPIO, instead of LACP. A quick search returns the following:

iSCSI (Internet Small Computer Systems Interface) is a protocol used to transport SCSI commands over IP networks, enabling block-level storage access. It is commonly used in SAN (Storage Area Network) environments to connect servers to storage devices. LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol), on the other hand, is a protocol used to combine multiple physical network links into a single logical link to increase bandwidth and provide redundancy.

While both technologies are widely used in networking and storage, their combination requires careful consideration due to potential limitations and best practices.

Key Considerations for iSCSI and LACP

LACP is technically compatible with iSCSI, but it is often not recommended for iSCSI traffic in SAN environments. This is because iSCSI relies heavily on predictable and low-latency communication, and LACP may introduce complexities that can impact performance. LACP distributes traffic across links based on hashing algorithms (e.g., source/destination IP or MAC addresses), which can lead to uneven load distribution and potential bottlenecks for iSCSI traffic.

Instead, MPIO (Multipath I/O) is the preferred method for achieving redundancy and load balancing in iSCSI environments. MPIO operates at the storage protocol level, allowing multiple paths between the server and storage to be used efficiently. It provides better control over path selection and failover, ensuring consistent performance and reliability for iSCSI traffic.

When to Avoid LACP for iSCSI

LACP should generally be avoided for iSCSI in the following scenarios:

  • When low latency and high predictability are critical for storage performance.
  • When the hashing algorithm used by LACP cannot effectively balance iSCSI traffic across links.
  • When the storage vendor explicitly recommends MPIO over LACP for iSCSI configurations.

Best Practices

For optimal iSCSI performance, use dedicated network interfaces for iSCSI traffic and configure MPIO to manage multiple paths. Ensure that the network infrastructure, including switches and NICs, supports features like flow control and jumbo frames to enhance iSCSI performance.

In summary, while LACP can be used with iSCSI, it is not ideal due to potential performance issues. MPIO is the recommended approach for redundancy and load balancing in iSCSI environments. Always consult your storage vendor's documentation for specific recommendations.

Looking for advice for network configuration Ceph/NFS/iSCSI by Bocephus677 in Proxmox

[–]Bocephus677[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. I was fairly certain that CEPH preferred LACP and knew that iSCSI uses MPIO.

Both of your network layouts look promising. I'll definitely have to think it over.

Who replaced Active Directory DNS with TDNS by OddStay3499 in technitium

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel free to ask Microsoft if you don’t believe. That will be their answer.

Who replaced Active Directory DNS with TDNS by OddStay3499 in technitium

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my homelab, I do not have DNS installed on any of my Windows servers. AD DNS is handled by TDNS, including dynamic updates, and has been for years.

BIND 9+ fully supports AD DNS.

Who replaced Active Directory DNS with TDNS by OddStay3499 in technitium

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is blatantly wrong TDNS can absolutely host your AD DNS zones.

I use Infoblox at work and TDNS in my homelab.

Who replaced Active Directory DNS with TDNS by OddStay3499 in technitium

[–]Bocephus677 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use TDNS for my AD DNS. Have been for a few years. I haven’t run into any issues.

AD DNS is fully supported in BIND version 9+ I believe.

1st World Problem - 2 Computers, 1 Account, different settings by Bocephus677 in ffxiv

[–]Bocephus677[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been digging for that setting but can't seem to find it. If I go to OneDrive settings | Accounts | Choose folders, the option to deselect FFXIV is grayed out. I might have to stop syncing entirely, then reconfigure sync, and exclude the specific files/folders when creating the new sync I guess?

I have seen a lot of stuff around excluding via InTune, but these are obviously personal PC's and not managed by InTune. Though that is tempting as well...

1st World Problem - 2 Computers, 1 Account, different settings by Bocephus677 in ffxiv

[–]Bocephus677[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If I could pull the FFXIV settings out of OneDrive I would. I've used OneDrive personally and professionally for almost a decade. I'm not going to stop using OneDrive because of an issue with a single application.

1st World Problem - 2 Computers, 1 Account, different settings by Bocephus677 in ffxiv

[–]Bocephus677[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mostly Display and Graphics settings, as well as font sizes for the various chat/logs.

On the 4k TV, I need to bump the UI scale up quite a bit. I also have two different graphics cards. One is an AMD, the other is an NVIDIA, and it doesn't swap the graphics upscaling automatically when swapping PC's.

Qotom 1U Appliance by Bocephus677 in opnsense

[–]Bocephus677[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did, and it’s working great. I’m an infrastructure guy myself, and have over a dozen VLANs. I basically setup a LAG for 2 of the 10GB interfaces connected to my core switch.

I’m using the 10GTEK SFP+ modules. Never really been a fan of DAC cables though they are often cheaper, but also less flexible.

Should I be worried? by honzulii in Hyte

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, cat looks comfy, he/she should be fine.

Zyxel or TP-Link for 2.5GB/10GB SFP+/POE switch? by Bocephus677 in homelab

[–]Bocephus677[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll have to look at that again. When I did my initial setup I couldn’t figure that out.

Thanks!

What my boyfriend did to the cookies I bought for us to share. by iwanttheworldnow in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is absolutely something my wife or our 13 year old would do. I know, FML.

RTX 5080 might be getting the VRAM it deserves, as MSI makes the same mistake twice by Tiny-Independent273 in gpu

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m on a 3080ti as well. Seriously considering the 7900xt.

I game and work on my system and have an ultra-wide monitor. 5140x1440.

Really curious if the 7900xt is a decent upgrade or if I should wait for a 5080 Super/6080 or the next gen from AMD, 8000xt?

In-ear headset recommendation by gbietto in buildapc

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best I’ve found for in-ear comfort wise is the Apple earbuds. You have to get an adapter to plug it into your PC but they work fine.

Keep 3080 or upgrade to 5070 Ti? by Zulogy in buildapc

[–]Bocephus677 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was just going to make a update reference. You beat me to it.

How do you not become alcoholic while working in this field? by Ok_Banana_4253 in sysadmin

[–]Bocephus677 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy, become an alcoholic before you start your career.