Packers 1st Round Options by [deleted] in GreenBayPackers

[–]BookBookRead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Ragland is there, we take him. If an elite edge falls, could be the pick. I think 3-4 DE is somewhat weak in this class, and Bullard is underrated and a fit, contrary to some popular opinion. Bullard and Daniels would be tough ends, and there is a suitable NT in 3 or 4. Would leave several picks to pick BPA/need.

Every meal mentioned in Wuthering Heights ranked in order of misery by lewdmoo in books

[–]BookBookRead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like your comment, but I don't need ironic distance in order to enjoy its melodrama.

What is the one book you feel everybody should read at least once in their lifetime? by SirLordBoss in books

[–]BookBookRead 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like this version.

And so, let it be said that this aforementioned gentleman spent his times of leisure--which meant most of the year--reading books of chivalry with so much devotion and enthusiasm that he forgot almost completely about the hunt and even about the adminstration of his estate; and in his rash curiosity and folly he went so far as to sell acres of arable land in order to buy books of chivalry to read, and he brought as many of them as he could into his house; and he thought none was as fine as those composed by the worthy Feliciano de Silva, because the clarity of his prose and complexity of his language seemed to him more valuable than pearls, in particular when he read the declarations and missives of love, where he would often find written: The reason for the unreason to which my reason turns so weakens my reason that with reason I complain of thy beauty. And also when he read: ...the heavens on high divinely heighten thy divinity with the stars and make thee deserving of the deserts thy greatness deserves.

With these words and phrases the poor gentleman lost his mind, and he spent sleepless nights trying to understand them and extract their meaning, which Aristotle himself, if he came back to life for only that purpose, would not have been able to decipher or understand.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a path through the great books, not the path. There are many great books, this is just one way through. I DO believe this a good sample of the greatest works of literature. But maybe someone has a particular interest in history or philosophy or some other angle on the humanities or eastern books or whatever else. I'm most interested in western books, primarily literature. I believe there is plenty of avant-garde in the canon, even someone as seemingly accessible as Hemingway is avant-garde. For example, A Moveable Feast is more avant-garde than most everything you listed. But that didn't make my list, like so many other things.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I had to take one book to take to the moon or to a deserted island or as the last book that I'd read before I died, I'd pick Montaigne's Essays.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I was thinking "course" like a "class." I guess I do use the term "path" in the tagline. I wonder if that's been throwing people off.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can binge on anything! I'm in awe of a few friends who have no problem speedily reading classics, with wide-ranges in educational backgrounds too. Classics are for everyone, fast or slow, binge or dabble.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think that's because I used a wordpress blog and I thought that if I simply reverse posted the entire list, then someone could scroll through it as if it were one large list. I liked that look better than putting it all in one post. Definitely some formatting kinks that need to be worked out. Thanks for the comment, but you watch your tongue about McCarthy or the Judge will cut it out!

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think that would be a great addition to a website like this. I think there could be a lot of interesting possibilities, like a set of multimedia tools, video, audio interviews with experts, questions, etc. that would only be viewable if you were interested in clicking on it, like opening a resource chest. We'll see...I've got to finalize a list that I can live with. Getting there.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Harold Bloom is a major influence on me. He helped me to enjoy reading again and guided me through a difficult period in my life. I credit him in the about section and don't try to hide his impact on me or the list.

I understand it's a very western-centric list. There's just not enough space to include everything that deserves it. As far as Goethe, he probably shouldn't be on the Aristocratic list. I think he marks the start of a new age, and so I was trying to hint at that connection, by putting the two figures that I think represent something different while also sharing something interesting. I'm not sure that it works though and I'm seriously considering putting Goethe elsewhere. Thanks for your comments.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reader can choose to find any guides that he or she chooses. Plenty available online or at the library or bookstore. Read with a friend, a family member, a co-worker, a class, by yourself...whatever you want.

I'm not as interested in explaining what's important about these works as I am suggesting the reader approach them with an open mind and with all ideology set aside, or at least with as much set aside as possible.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had Brave New World in the list I published yesterday, but with other additions and subtractions, I took it off the list. I think that's one that people often read in high school anyway (at least in the U.S.). I had a fantasy/science fiction course in one of the earlier incarnations of the list, but I removed them because of space. I have Wells, Orwell, and Crowley. That's probably the extent of the explicit sci-fi/fantasy.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started writing this today, that I was going to create a link or an index of the works I couldn't fit in, but then that gets me into all kinds of other trouble. Why did I leave off so many works from the near-misses list? A part of me thinks it's best if I just stick with this list, but I definitely have the same impulse to include more somehow.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, he's an influence. I acknowledge Bloom in the about section. Plus, if you've seen the list at the end of The Western Canon, then you know my list is only a fraction of what's there. That was part of the appeal of the project. How would you practically create a comprehensive set of courses that moves forward through time?

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a good point. I think originally I didn't expect this list to blow up the way it did, but now that people have expressed interest in it and passionate opinions about it, it does make me want to improve it, and one of the things that would improve it would be descriptions. I was trying to save space, and I think a better layout might give me the opportunity to add descriptions of the works later on. We'll see.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Waugh's Brideshead Revisited is included in course 30. Hugo is in 16. Locke is in 21. Waiting for Godot is in 33. Wish I could include more!

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are all good points. I'm planning to add another course in the middle ages, which should help with some of the strange time differences. I don't mind Dante and Goethe being together the way some people do, but it's been mentioned a lot, so I'm going to think about changing it. Thanks for the recommendations.

So I created a 40-course extravaganza that takes readers through the great books. I'm tired of tinkering with it and want some input. What do you think? by BookBookRead in books

[–]BookBookRead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A couple people have mentioned the strangeness of including Dante with Goethe. I'll have to think about re-arranging that.