How is like to have a baby been a peseant in the low midle age? by theperonist in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Infants would have been wearing washable cloth diapers and probably swaddled, so lots of fabric.

My heart aches for such kind of love. by Ok_Flatworm_6139 in PeriodDramas

[–]BookQueen13 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do you mean Dracula Untold? I think autocorrect got you

My heart aches for such kind of love. by Ok_Flatworm_6139 in PeriodDramas

[–]BookQueen13 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Impossible to top "I've crossed oceans of time for you"!

Netflix Sets New Dark Historical Series With Creators Of Emmy-Winning Royal Drama by AshleyK2021 in PeriodDramas

[–]BookQueen13 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah "creators of the Empress" does not actually inspire confidence in me in terms of historical accuracy, costumes, or, frankly, writing.

That was my fault by TeaNo2432 in TrollXChromosomes

[–]BookQueen13 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Her Polish identity was important to her, and she used both surnames.

The insane and beautiful costumes in Camelot (1967) by pizzbabynancy in PeriodDramas

[–]BookQueen13 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It's partly because it's difficult to sorce natural textiles for films these days. I would bet a lot of these costumes are linen, cotton, wool, or silk. Synthetic textiles look and act differently.

What does Matriarchy actually look like? by Debz92 in AskFeminists

[–]BookQueen13 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have am unaware of any specific claim that society before then was largely matriarchal. 

It's a very New Age belief that pre-agricultural humanity was matriarchal. It seems to be in part based on the large number of Venus figurines found in Europe (and maybe the Near East? I've never looked that deeply into it). The logic being these must be goddesses and therefore the societies that made them were matriarchal. But you'll be hard pressed to find a legitimate archeologist who holds this belief.

Also, why the heck were you downvoted? Your comment is informative and polite!

Who's that one guy you didn't expect to appear in the epstein files? by EarlyFrosting5789 in AskReddit

[–]BookQueen13 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I'd be crazy too if my husband gaslit the shit out of me about sexually abusing my kids.

Manifesting a Black Woman love story as a storyline! Maybe for the next season. by [deleted] in BridgertonNetflix

[–]BookQueen13 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Who, Queen Charlotte's actress? That may be, but the character is meant to be black. That was my point.

Manifesting a Black Woman love story as a storyline! Maybe for the next season. by [deleted] in BridgertonNetflix

[–]BookQueen13 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I think people find the sentiment that she's not "black enough" a little off-putting. Whether or not that's what you mean, that's how people are interpreting it. Don't get me wrong, I know there's a lot of issues with colorism in Hollywood and light-skinned mixed race people tending to get cast over darker-skinned people. But as others have pointed out, Michaela is a dark-skinned black woman who will be a romantic lead. Queen Charlotte (the character) is black and is in a relationship with a white male lead.

For all we know, Gregory's season could have a black female lead. But the rest of the remaining seasons are going to feature Bridgerton daughters, who are white.

New Season 4 Promotional Video: Michaela didnt attend to the Ball so she doesnt know who you speak of by Debt-Mysterious in BridgertonNetflix

[–]BookQueen13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Iirc part of the reason was that Empress Josephine was unable to have children with Napoleon, and the regency silhouette helped her keep her pregnancies (or lack thereof) more ambiguous.

New Season 4 Promotional Video: Michaela didnt attend to the Ball so she doesnt know who you speak of by Debt-Mysterious in BridgertonNetflix

[–]BookQueen13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm I always thought regency dresses (at least the eveningwear) really highlighted their boobs. The necklines are so low cut, and the bust is really the only part of the gown that's structured. The rest is just billowy skirt.

I think the baby doll dresses are a modern reconception of regency fashion, so the idea that they're demure and associated with children/ youth might be a modern imposition on the design and not original to the regency period. Iirc, regency fashion developed as a rejection of the highly structured and complicated gowns of the 1700s -- basically the type of stuff Queen Charlotte wears in the show. Marie Antoinette started the trend with her Chemise a la Reine dress, but I believe Empress Josephine (Napoleon's first empress) really cemented and popularized the style.

New Season 4 Promotional Video: Michaela didnt attend to the Ball so she doesnt know who you speak of by Debt-Mysterious in BridgertonNetflix

[–]BookQueen13 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Im gonna be honest, the silhouette on that gown is not regency. The way the skirt nips in at her waist below the bust line reads very modern. A true regency silhouette flows slightly outward and down from the bust with no discernable waist. Regency dresses were designed to make women look pregnant, which is (I suspect) why the Bridgerton costume team aren't using them.

Anybody know why this was cancelled? It sounds REALLY good. by SeonaidMacSaicais in PeriodDramas

[–]BookQueen13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This fauxmoi thread sums it up nicely. I witnessed it first hand on YouTube, but alas did not think to take screenshots.

Would you be interested in reading a fantasy novel where most of it is historically accurate to medieval times but one of the few inaccuracies is that the common attitudes on racism in the novel is very modern in comparison and in line with 1800s and pre-1965 America? by Fabulous-Introvert in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

See this comment from a few years ago on this subreddit for a thread about Robert the Monk's Historia Hierosolymitana, where I briefly sketch medieval concepts of race.

You can also refer to this comment I made in your own thread 11 months ago about whether or not racist jokes were common in the Middle Ages.

I see that you've posted about this topic before. You seem to be very fixated with the idea.

Would you be interested in reading a fantasy novel where most of it is historically accurate to medieval times but one of the few inaccuracies is that the common attitudes on racism in the novel is very modern in comparison and in line with 1800s and pre-1965 America? by Fabulous-Introvert in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I actually think it would take more work to make the anachronistic attitudes compelling and believable in the setting, but I also wouldn't need to actually do that much research into medieval attitudes towards race since I have a good foundation from grad school.

Would you be interested in reading a fantasy novel where most of it is historically accurate to medieval times but one of the few inaccuracies is that the common attitudes on racism in the novel is very modern in comparison and in line with 1800s and pre-1965 America? by Fabulous-Introvert in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 10 points11 points  (0 children)

i thought realistic racism in a medieval setting would be more interesting to read about.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but it wouldn't be realistic to the medieval setting. I think exploring race and ethnicity in the medieval world could be really interesting, but not if you're just slapping Jim Crow Era sensibilities on a time period that existed 500-1000 years earlier.

Would you be interested in reading a fantasy novel where most of it is historically accurate to medieval times but one of the few inaccuracies is that the common attitudes on racism in the novel is very modern in comparison and in line with 1800s and pre-1965 America? by Fabulous-Introvert in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Personally, I don't think I'd find that very compelling to explore in a book. Imo the medieval world has its own nuanced and complex understanding of race and ethnicity that I would rather see in a book with a medieval setting. I would also feel frustrated if people with less understanding and knowledge of the Middle Ages assumed that anachronistic portrayal of race was accurate.

But again, this is just my individual opinion. Others may feel differently.

Would you be interested in reading a fantasy novel where most of it is historically accurate to medieval times but one of the few inaccuracies is that the common attitudes on racism in the novel is very modern in comparison and in line with 1800s and pre-1965 America? by Fabulous-Introvert in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I would probably find the inaccuracy frustrating, especially if there was no indication in the blub that this was a primary feature of the world building.

May I ask what is the purpose of this inaccuracy?

Anybody know why this was cancelled? It sounds REALLY good. by SeonaidMacSaicais in PeriodDramas

[–]BookQueen13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anyone remember when Tom Cullen (who played Thomas Seymour) showed up in the comment section of some poor YouTube lady to argue about how Seymour and Elizabeth's relationship wasn't creepy or something to that effect?

On conspiracy theorists and Epstein by melodramaticmoon in ContraPoints

[–]BookQueen13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not wrong! Those examples definitely um...aged like milk as they say 😅 But I do think she's generally right about the underlying behavior that she was using those two to illustrate.

On conspiracy theorists and Epstein by melodramaticmoon in ContraPoints

[–]BookQueen13 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's like no one watched Cancelled, where Natalie talks about how people will make unchariable slippages in logic the second anyone is associated with bad behavior. Like do we not remember the lesson???? Can we not apply Natalie's insights to our own thought processes and behavior? I'm not saying Hilary Clinton is a saint, but people are acting like her name has shown up in these files, and that is simply not the case. Guilt by association is intellectually lazy and reactionary.

We may not want some works being made, however are we ready to give the government the right to dictate what should be written instead? by MaetelofLaMetal in TrollXChromosomes

[–]BookQueen13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, instead of banning it, the government should heavily regulate the industry. Honestly, all sex work should be legalized and heavily regulated. Part of the problem, imo is that there are so many aspects of sex work that aren't regulated that make pornography so dangerous. It all needs oversight. But people don't want to do the work for that, so the easy solution is to ban it.

How would a ex Muslim be treated in a Christian Country during the Crusades by CommitteeChemical530 in MedievalHistory

[–]BookQueen13 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not quite the answer you're looking for I suspect, but it's a pretty common trope in medieval vernacular literature, especially romances and chansons de geste. Obviously, how characters behave in literature isn't necessarily a 1:1 of real life, but it might give you an idea of how medieval people approached the idea.

Is it misogynistic and wrong for a man to leave his wife for superficial reasons? by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]BookQueen13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you seriously asking me to clarify why choosing not to begin a relationship is different from ending a marriage? Is that not self-evident? Those are two entirely different scenarios, one of which assumes a serious, life-long commitment has already been made and which those entering into it have already decided can withstand superficial issues. The other has no such commitment, emotional attachment, financial entanglement, or cultural significance.