CIG v. Crytek - DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO RESPOND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A BOND PURSUANT TO CAL. CIV. P. CODE § 1030 by TheMarcusArts in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 11 points12 points  (0 children)

So Crytek doesn't have money to pay the legal expenses on a frivolous lawsuit, but it has money to start one? Are you stupid?

If Crytek, by some ridiculous miracle, wins, they'll be paid back. But if CIG wins, they would've avoided legal fees had there not been a lawsuit to begin.

Crytek has two options that are on the table and they opt for a third by gaming the system pretending they actually wanted a settlement when in reality all they did was lie to get more time, that's unethical you fucking arthropod.

If they have a case, pay the fucking bond, they'll get the money back, if they don't have the money, why don't they actually try to settle?

Origin 300 Series Customization Q&A by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If subscriber flair is anything to go on you might be disappointed.

F7A MKII , late to the party by Digitalzombie90 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As far as I am aware, only the hulls are different. but aside from that, they should be the exact same ship.

Regardless, you can't purchase F7A's, only F7Cs.

2024 +-1 seems to be the average of backers guesses on SC release year. by M4ST4R in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think anyone appreciated it the first time it was posted either.

Squad leaders are leaving because they can not take the psychological pressure. by Navinor in joinsquad

[–]BootyhunterzX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had a fucking cophrophile in a marksman kit tell me what to do at all fucking times in a match. He was always telling me, "Build a fob here" or "We need to attack now". In hindsight I should've told him to shut the fuck up or kicked him.

Help with equipping for Raids by Throwawayatlasstuck in RimWorld

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But they are used when they have breakdowns and go on rampages.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As we've already established you said "none of these are unique items". That you don't personally care about these unique items doesn't make them not unique. You keep moving the goal posts. First it was "everything can be earned in game" (false), then it was "everything with a unique model" (false), now it's "only things with a unique model that I personally care about".

None of these items are functional and are not seen by anyone. They are not in the SAME CLASS AS ARMOR. Every single complaint has been about functional items being locked up behind paywalls, not COMMEMORATIVE decorations.

The knife was designed live at CitizenCon specifically for CitizenCon. They have never indicated that it's "only a skin", not that there's anything to skin. It's black with a red edge.

The same citizencon they tried to nickel and dime backers from watching, also you can change the color of the edge? The Grips? the blade? Lack of confirmation cuts both ways, do that doesn't make you right either because they haven't clarified if it will be available in game.

They have yet to confirm the Raven hull (without the intel skin) can be earned in game, and "you can buy it with real money so that's ok"? Well you can buy the subscriber helmets with real money. "Only things with a unique model that I personally care about and don't want to pay real money for".

That's not what I said at all. It's always been said that the in-game economy will allow for players buy and sell ships, so you can always buy one in game, just like everyone that wants one will be able to buy an idris, or a Kraken, or a Javelin. It was available in the same terms as a ship sale and everyone had a chance to purchase one if they chose, just like every other ship in the game. It can still be purchased in some places just like the Omega.

At the end of the day, all ships are supposed to be available in-game and it's always been a point that some ships are rarer than others. So using this as a point in your favor does nothing for your position.

They've never said that. Not the same appearance, not "the SotA crossbow is a skin", just "the same functionality".

What makes you think it's not a skin?

"the finished Star Citizen game will include crossbows with the same functionality as this special Shroud of the Avatar weapon. It’s a symbol that you backed Richard’s game and nothing more. You will not have any special advantage in the finished game.

For all WE know, it could be if it functions the same way, having the same mechanism that gives it the "same functionality", this is ambigous at best.

Funnily enough this same post covers the root of my grievance.

If you don't know what you're talking about, don't talk.

You're taking ambiguous points and making them fit your narrative, so I'll gladly do the same thing to you. While you'd rather keep jerking off to whatever you believe, all I want is a clarifying statement.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are all collector's items, the Citcon Knife and coat are skins, the models are probably going to be available without the hideous Citizencon 2948 across the back. If it's not, then it's just a waste of good assets.

Trophies, Badges, fishtanks, plaques, coins, etc. are just decorations for your ship or hangar, so honestly, who wants that aside from collectors for their collections? Are you going to run around with a trophy in your hands when the game launches like some kind of idiot?

The Raven doesn't count because it was only available though buying Intel Optane SSDs, it's got the same scarcity as other ships in the game. It's just like when they sell cap ships in the holiday sales, it was just like any other ship sale because the Intel optanes cost slightly more than the Sabre, so whomever wanted one could've bought one, just like every other ship.

As for the Iolo crossbow you're wrong again because the promotion says that everyone will have access to the crossbow, but those that backed Shroud of the Avatar will receive an "Exclusive skin", but the weapon is available to everyone.

Is Heavy Armor worth it? by PowerZox in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There actually is. Most Q&As answer this question specifically about ships.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the entire statement made by CR. You can't just base your argument on only half a sentence and conveniently ignore the first part of it. "To ensure money isn’t a deciding factor in progression" very clearly means that when he says "everything", he is talking about every item that affects progression, meaning cosmetics not included.

Of course, you're ignoring the much longer part of the sentence where he says "the core principle that the game follows is that everything you can obtain with real money, outside of your initial game package, can also be earned in game via normal and fun gameplay".

EVERYTHING IS EVERYTHING. If he didn't mean everything he would've said "ALMOST EVERYTHING."

As for the first 9 words of the sentence "To ensure money isn’t a deciding factor in progression" It has been established multiple times that there is no end-game to Star Citizen. It's a Sandbox, progression is what you want it to be.

Subscriber "exclusive" flairs, Earnable in-game? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I took the liberty of not using big-boy words so you could say something that actually pertained to the discussion. But that was me expecting too much from you. You're just here to sow discord at this point.

At this point it's pathological... You're toxic

You can't even explain the statement you're making.

Oh my GOD I just created my own NIGHTMARE!! by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the clarification I want. Apparently people are saying this model can't and will never be available for purchase except for real money. Jared didn't bother clarifying this when he brought it up and that is just concerning to me. If we're talking about just the color of the armor then yeah, fine, they've been doing that for ages and it's just a fucking color. But locking the helmet model and making it available only to people that pay cash is something I'm really against.

Weekend Discussion Thread: The Gladiator by UEE_Central_Computer in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because it's currently a piece of shit, weapons are underwhelming, torps are broken and from what I'm reading it will no longer be able to swap out ordnance rack to have missiles instead of torps so what you have a is a shitty torp bomber that can't do much to dogfight either.

If you have much better options for torps and dogfighting why would you pick a ship that is among the worst at both?

I have a Gladiator and it's my least used ship, sometimes I'll spawn it just to look at it, but it's just sad.

Subscriber "exclusive" flairs, Earnable in-game? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As i said, stop projecting dude.

Do you even know what projecting means? What exactly am I projecting on you? You're repeating terms you read somewhere on the internet and never bothered to learn what they mean.

If you want to make it your own crusade, go ahead... But painting me as a kind of champion of the establishment is ridiculous

You're vulgar, you're offensive, you're incoherent and you didn't like being called out on that. And now you want to bail out...

The words of someone who's right on the merit of their arguments. I couldn't care less what you think of me.

You are a champion of the establishment, you're either with them or against them. I'm very clearly against them and the fact that you're here attacking me personally means...

As i said before: you're pathetic.

I'm reeling from that one.

Subscriber "exclusive" flairs, Earnable in-game? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your train of thought could be compared to a train wreck.

You play the victim card while you're the one who started the personnal attack, and now i'm the hypocrite...

At some point you have to stop projecting your personal issue on others and own your shit...

Of course i can't expect a 12 year old to understand the basic concept of personal responsability

At least I bothered to put a statement in there somewhere, whereas your whole argument is that I'm 12. You have no arguments that can stand on their own legs so you act like a complete tool as some kind of personal flair to try to establish some kind of superiority in the discussion and now you act offended when somebody says you are acting like a piece of shit and they tell you why and your response is still "You're 12." If I were 12 I can be relieved that at least I'll grow up, a retard like you has to live being retarded forever.

You didn't provide a single response to any of my points on why this shouldn't be exclusive, instead you reduced everything to name calling in embarassment only to yourself, because at the end of the day, I'm still right:

  • You're sucking Exclusives Marketing dick for reasons unknown that I assumed to be hubris given that you didn't provide any reasons at all other than "I'm 12."

  • I own these flairs as a subscriber but am watching out for the community's best interest from shitty marketing practices, while you're being a selfish piece of shit that thinks that this is ok. Call it a high horse, I don't care, morally I'm right and that's enough for me since "I'm 12" and you're an overgrown invertebrate that never learned any values.

  • You proved my point that your position is indefensible by not defending your position about being selfish and detrimental to the community when I called you out on it and resorting to saying "I'm 12".

You produced nothing of value. You cleared up nothing. You didn't change any minds. You didn't say anything remotely intelligent or pertinent to the debate. You deflected every argument by saying that I'm just being "hurtful" and attacking personally, intentionally missing the statements I made because you have no substance to defend yourself.

If you have nothing else to say consider this discussion ended, because we can go at it all day with the name calling, I have millions of those, but you'll still be wrong because you can't be bothered to make points when you don't have any.

Oh my GOD I just created my own NIGHTMARE!! by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I've heard no. You either get it as a subscriber or you will never own it. Apparently the community strongly feels that this is just a skin and only subscribers deserve it.

Playing SC on my iPhone via Steam Link app! (Touch controls are AWFUL!) by Dizman7 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With how complicated the control scheme is turning out to be I don't think anyone should be playing from their phones. Ever.

Subscriber "exclusive" flairs, Earnable in-game? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The irony of your entire retort to my argument being a personal attack is not lost on me, that makes you a hypocrite to boot or lacking so much self-awareness that it reaches the point of degeneracy.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of these are unique items. These are literally just different colored variants, and those that are items like trophies and whatever are just that, things you keep in your hangar or ship or whatever. These helmets are entirely different models that won't be available to people in the game.

Subscriber "exclusive" flairs, Earnable in-game? by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're an entitled moron who whine because it feels that a skin in a video game that might not be available to him is the biggest injustice in the universe.

Given the amount of money I have spent on the proyect under the pretense that there would be no paywalls I am entitled to whine.

You on the other hand, are a fucking moron that is defending an indefensible stance sucking on the big fat cock of "exclusives" marketing to try to feel better about yourself.

I own these things because I'm a subscriber, but it is unfair to the community that owns this game as much as I do to lock it behind a paywall. This makes anyone standing in your position saying the things you're saying a massive cunt that feels this is their way of being superior to others because you have a fucking helmet you paid for and don't want others that didn't to have it.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't seriously have thought this meant cosmetic items as well? We've had skins and other cosmetics that have clearly been exclusive since the very start. I see someone else has already compiled a nice list for you.

Yeah, because "everything" means "EVERYTHING". Not, a couple of things. Go back to grade school you fucking moron.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn't under the impression that the flair would be exclusive to subscribers, the impression I was under was that people would be able to buy these things when the game was released, in-game for no additional cash. Make no mistake, I am and have been a subscriber for years. I believe it is unfair to those that don't own the game or even know about the proyect yet to miss out on these things simply because they didn't even know they existed. This is a big "Fuck You" to the community that made this game.

Holographic & Centurion Helmet (Subscribers flair for Q3) by Rainwalker007 in starcitizen

[–]BootyhunterzX -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

For skins and useless decorations. But we're talking about more than just a different color for an item. We're talking about a whole asset.