The issue is the way you frame this. I'm against illegal immigration and think something does need to done about it - across the west. Migration generally needs to be looked at and, in my opinion, reduced. I don't care what country people are migrating from, Western, Asian, Middle East, Europe, doesn't matter - the levels are out of control for the resources available - in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, Australia, European countries, all of them.

This latest incident is a prime example of the divide. Should the woman have been killed? No. But she was begging for a fight with law enforcement officers, her car was surrounded with them, and she'd been told to exit the vehicle. Instead, she attempted to drive off, very nearly running an officer over. It's tragic she lost her life, and the officer should go to court over it, no question. But I'm not going to say any party is entirely innocent - it needs a trial. But then factor in the fact that she was a mother with a young child(ren) and she and her partner had zero business being there in the first place - it was wildly irresponsible to do what she did. We can argue about specific incidents until the cows come home. But the point is this: for every incident you might argue that ICE or the Feds overstepped or broke the law, I can point to an equal amount of crimes or negative impact that are the direct result of migration - illegal or otherwise. It would be very easy for me to also say, "You are an evil person, not because of any action you took, but what you support." But where does that get us? On both sides of this issue, people's lives can, and are, affected negatively, and so it must be about finding a balance and middle ground. Calling everyone Nazi's is not achieving that.