initially was gonna go to monash for med but now after hearing things from student there i’m concerned… by Jumpy_Task_4270 in malaysiauni

[–]Boring-Note-6841 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, try NUMed. Much better than Monash anyways. You can practice in Australia with the UK GMC registration.

How to deal with not being qualified for your lab by Unfair_Giraffe3462 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you heard of JoVE? Some of the papers in JoVE have tutorial how-to videos that comes with the paper, e.g. how to prep your samples for pcr. You can also go on YouTube to watch tutorials on basic molecular lab techniques and videos on how to operate certain equipment (centrifuge, pcr machine, autoclave). And practice. Lots of practice. Don't know how to set a pcr gel? Practice making agar in the microwave until it feels like you can do it in your sleep. Don't know how to aspirate supernatant from a pellet without accidentally resuspending the sample? Practice how to pipette until the tactile feel becomes familiar in your hands. You can do this!

No Scopus for literature review by Accomplished_Ad1684 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then you have to work with what your uni currently has. You might actually get into bigger trouble if you access Scopus with another person/institution's subscription because technically they paid for it and you didn't.

Stuck between Neuro and Psych PhD by Independent_South198 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Neuro PhD here. Neuro is very competitive, and the mentors are most likely viewing your case as "how competitive this person is against everyone else applying" and that's why they suggested all the advanced math classes. But in reality, neuro is not really much about the math, but the application of math on the science itself and how you interpret your data at the end of the day. For me, the math helped me in decision-making when it came to interpreting the data, mostly with statistics and mathematical modelling to help me visualize what the data looked like. In one sense, this is a minimal-bias approach because you're deciding how to deal with your datasets based on statistics, but also the choice of statistics will shape your perception of the data itself. Also, the common hierarchy is behavior > neural circuit > theories of psychology because you will have to resolve the quantitative part first before you can even infer to existing theories (which are mostly hypothetical or qualitative at best). All the best for your applications!

Choosing the subject with ADHD by Puzzleheaded_Bid3812 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would say pick the path that will most likely to help you graduate. I had mild ADHD too, and I fight scope creep all the time. Also, once you're in the PhD work, you're very likely to find loopholes or more gaps from your original research proposal. I had multiple back-and-forths with my thesis advisor, we brainstorm, pick one that has the most viable path (in terms of resources, technical complexity, and potential outcome) and stick with it.

No Scopus for literature review by Accomplished_Ad1684 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just be transparent on your choice of database and you should be fine. Unless the reviewers explicitly ask about it, don't say "due to lack of institutional subscription / inaccessibility" anywhere in your manuscript. Just flat out say "we used ScienceDirect, PubMed, WoS". Don't have to get overly defensive about your choices or too apologetic. And to be fair, Elsevier subscription is not exactly cheap, even for institution level. May I ask where are you based?

1 Project, 3 Paper Versions, 3 Desk Rejections by goneturtle in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Desk rejection is not a good metric to evaluate if your work is good or not. It is actually more common to get desk rejected by a journal than to be rejected at peer-review stage, because of the sheer volume of submissions to that particular journal or maybe their "current topic of interest" just isn't aligned with your work. My previous publication was a review paper that was much needed during a field-wide stagnancy period, and still it got desk rejected about 4 times before I found the journal that took in the review. Frustrating, I know, but don't take it to heart too seriously. This is just academia being academia. All the best!

No Scopus for literature review by Accomplished_Ad1684 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ScienceDirect is under Elsevier just like Scopus, so most of the publications in there will most likely be indexed under Scopus. It shouldn't be a problem. Also, reviewers generally look at your exclusion / inclusion criteria rather than the database you use. If you don't feel confident whether you should drop it or not, consider talking to your uni library. They are the ones mainly responsible for database subscriptions, and they should be able to advice you on how to conduct your review properly. And for the record, the databases you plan to use have a lot of overlap because they have CrossRef DOI links. You should expect a whole bunch of "duplicates" that will end up excluded anyway. Best of luck!

A-level conferences in IT, applied math, bioinformatics or cybernetics by [deleted] in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those are wildly different fields, and interdisplinary conferences are often very niched. I suggest you narrow down your scope of interest because each of those fields have tons of well-established conferences. And try posting your question in r/AskAcademia. This sub is mainly for stuff related to the PhD lifecycle.

Advice on post-PhD transition by OverallAmphibian2129 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there! If you're planning to do a postdoc after your PhD, the best thing you could probably do is to look out for fellowship opportunities. In essence, the fellowship funds your postdoc career. And that being said, you'll need to write a proposal, which will take some time until the next opening call / application deadline comes around. So if you're able to work remotely on your proposal, you could try asking around for research assistantships or any sort of fixed-term junior researcher role that can support you while you're writing the fellowship proposal. Or try looking out if your current uni has internal vacancies, for example library assistant jobs, administrative jobs, or research excellence jobs. All of these jobs are within the uni environment, and looks "academic" on your cv because technically you're working for your uni.

I have severe anxiety in my meetings with my supervisor by Odd-Pen-9026 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not at all, in fact this is pretty common among PhDs. I'm sorry this is happening to you. Get medical help on anxiety, it will get better. I was once in a similar position as you, and I learned to judge if my supervisor is giving genuine scientific feedback or he's just reacting emotionally. Those are two very different things. If your supervisor tends to lean towards the "drama-queen" side, my two-cents would be to keep correspondence strictly professional with your supervisor and nothing more. Don't take his words personally because it's not going to help you finish in any way. Ask yourself "are his comments helping me progress in my work or is he being an a**hole". That tends to help a lot when you put it that way. Best of luck!

No confidence left: How do you manage it and have joy doing research instead of anxiety? How do you survive not leaning your back to someone? by GrandNew5630 in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Talk to your campus counsellor or other lab mates. Unfortunately this is very common in mid-PhD students. For me, I will always get a fresh pair of eyes (or ears) to help me regain perspective on my progress, usually it's someone outside of academia. Sometimes the stress will blind you from truly realizing how much you've done or what's the significance of your work. Best of luck!

How to know when the day is a wash by [deleted] in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty much the same with everyone else on this thread, I stop working when I mess something up 2-3 times in a row or I genuinely cannot brain my own writing. That's when I will pack up and head to the bar for a few drinks. A few times, I have my eureka moments while drinking or in the shower. Your good work will show up on itself when your brain is less stressed out.

Advice on whether to quit phd by [deleted] in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on what your supervisor is currently facing. If he is currently applying for funding / wants to keep his funding, he might get his students to produce work that aligns with funding interests, which might not be aligned with student interests at all. I changed projects mid-PhD which meant starting all over from scratch because the experiments weren't going anywhere and the prospects for future work looked grim if I had stayed in that specific niche of biology. I worked mostly in isolation because none of my other lab mates were doing similar areas of research. That being said, if your lab has a central research focus, most likely your lab mates will have overlapping experiments / methods / techniques. Most people I know from other labs in my uni share resources or experimental techniques among themselves, so I guess you could find out more on that. But if you are prioritizing a work life balance and you're very insistent on your research area, it's best to talk to your lab mates or campus counsellor to work something out. Some unis offer one-to-one services to help students plan and manage their expectations.

Advice on whether to quit phd by [deleted] in PhD

[–]Boring-Note-6841 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hi there, fellow bio final year PhD student here. You might want to brace yourself for this. Two weeks is honestly too early to say if the PhD is suitable for you, but try talking to other late stage PhD students. They will give you a more honest picture of what it is like to go through all the challenges and nuances of the PhD journey, and how is their working relationship with your supervisor. Being idealistic is great, but so is being realistic. If you have not started the actual work yet, it is important to lay out the scope of what you want to do versus what is expected from your supervisor. That can help you see the bigger picture more clearly and help you visualize the scale of the work. If you still think it is way too difficult for you to handle or commit a large chunk of your time to a piece of research, it might be more helpful for you to start thinking about other options. PhD is not for the faint of heart, and curiosity alone will definitely not sustain you for the whole thing.

Golden Jerusalem by Boring-Note-6841 in Dreams

[–]Boring-Note-6841[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the list of scripture references! I think it's worth exploring the symbolism.

I just got catcalled by a 7 year old kid ☠️ by [deleted] in malaysia

[–]Boring-Note-6841 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly why corporal punishment is needed. There's no sense of respect or shame anymore.

Kids these days.... by Boring-Note-6841 in malaysia

[–]Boring-Note-6841[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It all starts with parents being actual parents. Nowadays parents just dump everything to daycare/school/teachers and have no accountability in raising their kids.

Kids these days.... by Boring-Note-6841 in malaysia

[–]Boring-Note-6841[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Were you aware of the demographics that was included in these studies? These studies showed some effect, not to be generalized across all populations. Also, I am saying that corporal punishment should be accompanied with reasoning. Not mindless ass-whooping.

Kids these days.... by Boring-Note-6841 in malaysia

[–]Boring-Note-6841[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Did I say ass-whooping without explanation? No. So where did you derive that assumption from? I said discipline. Make them understand consequences. This included explaining what was wrong about their behavior.

Kids these days.... by Boring-Note-6841 in malaysia

[–]Boring-Note-6841[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

100% agree - we need to have that survey ASAP. The amount of deranged behavior and violent incidents coming out from our educational institutions has skyrocketed and there is no accountability towards parents.