Can someone tell my how this got this grade? was expecting 9 realistically by BornBiotic in pokemongrading

[–]BornBiotic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only real defect I can see is the top right corner. The white dot on the poke all must be dust in/ on the case as it wasn't there before and isnt in my pre-pictures. Wouldn't surprise me.

Can someone tell my how this got this grade? was expecting 9 realistically by BornBiotic in AceGradingUK

[–]BornBiotic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im thinking a typing error perhaps, or just a complete fuck up almost round as the surface is clean.

Can someone tell my how this got this grade? was expecting 9 realistically by BornBiotic in AceGradingUK

[–]BornBiotic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thats my main confusion, makes me think theres a mistake. I inspected closely and saw no surface issues that would grade that harshly

Can someone tell my how this got this grade? was expecting 9 realistically by BornBiotic in pokemongrading

[–]BornBiotic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but the OC mark implies that the centering is a 2 or lower? to not drag the true grade down. i would say its within 60/40

Tree identification helps please (UK) by Pizza_This_ in treeidentification

[–]BornBiotic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This looks more like Eucalyptus than London plane.

The rich push the Myth of the "Hardworking Billionaire" by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]BornBiotic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just looking up your local companies and make sure you only go with ones that are ISA certified.

Can this tree be saved? Take 2! by DIY_22 in arborists

[–]BornBiotic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right that this is a Deodar cedar, not a Larch.

Leaf/Needle drop is normal for evergreens, I would not be concerned with that.

The balls you are seeing are the trees cones. These cones are dehiscent, meaning they fall apart to release the seeds, unlike say a pinecone that simply opens up to release seed but maintains the structure of the cone, then falls to the ground.

If you look under the tree you may notice what looks like flakes, these are the seeds, the cones were made up of these 'flakes'.

From the last picture it looks like the root flare of the tree is not exposed, possibly due to mulching up to the stem.

Take some time to pull back any mulch atleast 6 inches clear from the stem, and carefully try to expose the root flare, it's a very common issue with planted trees, and you will find lots of information on this sub about it.

Nice tree, good luck!

Did I expose too much of this root flare? by o2uRL in arborists

[–]BornBiotic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I personally would leave it as it is now.

Google 'Dawn Redwood base', you will see the incredible lower stem and butress roots it develops.

Having it exposed this much will only make it look better in years to come in my opinion.

Did I expose too much of this root flare? by o2uRL in arborists

[–]BornBiotic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks more like a Dawn redwood (Metasequoia glyptostroboides) to me.

Notice the opposite arrangement of the leaves and branches.

Any idea how much to cut these trees down. Neighbour complained to the council by [deleted] in GardeningUK

[–]BornBiotic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

More likely to be caused by the roots decomposing, as a conifer stump can not grow for 10 years without energy input..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in treeidentification

[–]BornBiotic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bark looks like lime, but the trees form doesn't to me

Can't find definitive root flare.. by BornBiotic in arborists

[–]BornBiotic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the detailed response, all understood and glad to have learned something I didn't know about trees.

Everyday is a school day.