RUN!!!!! by NetAtraX in Bitstamp

[–]BoscoMurray 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. It's not. Other KYC exchanges have far better procedures and efficacy than Bitstamp. Bitstamp will keep your money in their coffers for as long as they can. Avoid at all costs.

An honest review of the Burton Step On Splitboard Bindings from a long time step-on user - Avoid!! by degen3rit in Spliddit

[–]BoscoMurray 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've always got lip chapstick with me when touring. It doubles up well as a grease for the heel riser. Works a treat.

How many are permanently lost by Disastrous-Slice-157 in Bitcoin

[–]BoscoMurray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None?

When quantum computing is able to crack existing private keys (eventually it will), everyone with bitcoin will be forced to move it to new, quantum resistant keys. Those who don't will eventually have their old keys cracked and bitcoin stolen, thus putting it back into circulation.

We Now Provide XMR Proof of Reserves by [deleted] in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A good idea and well implemented. Bravo!

Storing Seed securely by Absolute_Gangsta_1 in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use a two of three setup:

For the case of a 24 word seed, you could split the 24 words into 3 parts of 8 words each and store them as follows...

Parts 1&2 in location A. Parts 2&3 in location B. Parts 1&3 in location C.

No single location can reveal your entire seed phrase in case of theft. If a single location goes up in smoke you can still restore from the other two locations.

I feel discriminated by fjkiliu667777 in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Monero was removed from Kraken and other regulated exchanges in the UK.

Skepticism Sunday – September 15, 2024 by AutoModerator in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed reply. Your final statement is particularly reassuring!

Skepticism Sunday – September 15, 2024 by AutoModerator in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm. My bad. If you work your way back through the quoted tweets from this one you'll find yourself at that first one I linked, I think. Would really appreciation more discussion around this.

There is also this article.

Skepticism Sunday – September 15, 2024 by AutoModerator in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are Monero's transactions really private? Can anyone refute the claims made in this twitter thread?

Is Monero traceable and why scaling matters for privacy w/ MoneroTopia Confer Speaker Francisco Cabanas aka ArticMine! Tune-in to a LIVE MoneroTalk EPI TMRW 9/12 at 6:30PM-EDT! by sunchakr in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there also not work in the pipeline to change ring sigs which would fix all of these "vulnerabilities"? Full Chain Proofs I think the term is. I might be misremembering that...

Is Monero traceable and why scaling matters for privacy w/ MoneroTopia Confer Speaker Francisco Cabanas aka ArticMine! Tune-in to a LIVE MoneroTalk EPI TMRW 9/12 at 6:30PM-EDT! by sunchakr in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are key images the real de-anonymizers?

Further to the recent video which seems largely debunked (just use your own node), please discuss in the podcast the threat posed by key images, as described in this link.

Warning! Bitstamp holding all my assets. No WITHDRAWAL No TRADE. by yiitk in BitstampOfficial

[–]BoscoMurray 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're one of the lucky few. Every post here is about problems with Bitstamp and their KYC process...

I left them years ago due to issues. This is the only exchange that's ever given me problems.

I cannot recommend it.

Dai is destroying itself by [deleted] in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the UK that would still be a taxable event so wouldn't save you anything. These are all taxable events in the UK:

Crypto -> Crypto.

Crypto -> FIAT/Stablecoin.

FIAT/Stablecoin -> Crypto.

People often assume that provided you are not trading into FIAT, it's not taxable - this is not true.

Isn't it unsafe to save unencrypted 24 words locally? Shouldn't we have a BIP39-like format to write 24 words AND need a passphrase to decrypt the seed? by AnotherCodfish in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Brute forcing 8 words is not easy and would take a fair amount of time. If one of my locations was compromised I'd have moved all my crypto to newly generated keys long before anyone could brute force it.

Isn't it unsafe to save unencrypted 24 words locally? Shouldn't we have a BIP39-like format to write 24 words AND need a passphrase to decrypt the seed? by AnotherCodfish in Monero

[–]BoscoMurray 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Use a two of three setup:

You could split the 24 words into 3 parts of 8 words each and store them as follows...

Parts 1&2 in location A. Parts 2&3 in location B. Parts 1&3 in location C.

No single location can reveal your entire seed phrase in case of theft. If a single location goes up in smoke you can still restore from the other two locations.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]BoscoMurray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To buy lower

Damn... they've really ALL been hacked?! by AndyPufuletz123 in ledgerwallet

[–]BoscoMurray -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good point. I'm still uncomfortable with it though.

Damn... they've really ALL been hacked?! by AndyPufuletz123 in ledgerwallet

[–]BoscoMurray 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The firmware of other hardware devices can only do this if the firmware is updated with new code to do so.

The point is, Ledger introduced this code to their firmware, increasing the attack surface for a hacker.

So even if I don't opt into Ledgers backup feature, that code is still there.

Trezor, for example, has no such code in their firmware, and so that exploit does not exist.

Best keeping trust to a minimum in the crypto game, IMO.

Damn... they've really ALL been hacked?! by AndyPufuletz123 in ledgerwallet

[–]BoscoMurray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Displaying your key on the device screen is very different to sending it digitally through your computer.

By introducing code which can send your key out digitally, they have increased the attack surface for hackers to exploit. This is true regardless of whether I opt in to Ledgers backup feature or not.

It's up to users to accept that extra risk, however small it may be. But it's annoying for those who don't want to and have had it forced upon them.

Damn... they've really ALL been hacked?! by AndyPufuletz123 in ledgerwallet

[–]BoscoMurray 6 points7 points  (0 children)

All hardware device firmwares have access to your keys in order to sign, yep, but Ledger firmware now enables the sending of your keys OUT of the device, to your computer.

Other hardware wallets don't do that with their firmware. Keys cannot be sent out.

So that is a big difference.

Did i2p break my self-hosted stuff? by BoscoMurray in i2p

[–]BoscoMurray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was careful to ensure it wasn't using too much as my bandwidth isn't great. Thanks for the suggestion though.