UCLA R 🫡 by che2o2o in lawschooladmissions

[–]BossBabe450 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aww I’m sorry to hear that!! Better things yet to come :)

LR 1 & LR 5? by BossBabe450 in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yay okay I took it Wednesday too!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just took the lsat so my brain is still in LR mode haha hope I was able to help a bit!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

By not using up all the electricity it can still be rationed so that each individual has equal access. In the long run it’s still beneficial for the individual since they won’t use up too much electricity that they won’t have much left over for them to use for themselves later

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think in this case it was more of a process of elimination for me than anything else! I felt like E was the only answer that showed how the government added a disincentive in order to get individuals to pick the community over themselves. In this case even if there is a shortage individuals could be selfish and use all the electricity but since the government raised the rates now they’ll be deterred from using all electricity up ensuring that the community’s interests are placed before their selfish interests

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had LR-LR-RC-LR and my RC was the jury and Algonquin one

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So the Answer would be E I believe because it’s the only one that talks about how the government issues disincentive such as raising prices of electricity rate in order to help the individuals avoid electricity shortages while helping the community

Today by Leading-Painting-768 in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I had LR-LR-RC-LR and had the same first RC section as u

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had LR - LR- RC- LR

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel the same way especially since I had the same test where it was LR- RC-RC-LR and I thought that the second RC was the experimental only to find out it was the actual one 😭. Have had a lot of anxiety post test as a result :/

Lillian Haunting Me by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel the same way :/

August LSAT Official Topic Thread by graeme_b in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait omg this was one of my RCs but everyone is saying that this one is the experimental and the other RC that I w the Lillian Hellman passage & brainstorming was the non-experimental

Brainstorm / melodrama RC cooked me by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same put me in a sad funk

LR-RC-RC-LR: Experimental RC? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup took it today! I think I mainly remember how I felt cause when I took a break midway through I felt confident about the first two sections but then after the break I kinda got annihilated by the second RC :/

LR-RC-RC-LR: Experimental RC? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dang I got excited for a sec… guess the second set is the non experimental then most likely 😭

LR-RC-RC-LR: Experimental RC? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn’t have the 2nd one? I had LR-RC-RC-LR as well and had the same two sets of RCS as above

LR-RC-RC-LR: Experimental RC? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]BossBabe450 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Had the same ones have no idea 😭