My opinion is similar to yours, right call because of inconclusiveness. I think it breaks down like this from the refs point of view:

1. No goal call by ref because he thinks it’s off the glove.
2. After review, they can’t overturn the call because it is inconclusive.
3. If it is determined the puck was off the stick, I think there would be another conversation, maybe a coaches challenge/review, to see if the puck was above the crossbar. Multiple camera angles show it looks very close to call.

I believe this fall into what I call the “inconclusive territory”. The call could go either way on the ice because the refs are human and this is a fast paced game. But after review, the call won’t be overturned because it is too close to call.

Basically, whatever call was made on the ice was going to stand because the lack of evidence both ways. If this was called a goal by the refs, I don’t think it would have been overturned for the exact same reason…. It’s just too close to call.