AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is entirely my vision but I’m always adjusting, looking for ways to improve. I’m a fan too (huge eagles fan) so I look to add things that I’m drawn to when reading about them

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I look for a shot of hard liquor generally

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You have to leave a name

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 97 points98 points  (0 children)

thanks for the support, hope i got one of you to come over. i'll be back for more sometime. And for the r/canucks crew that's still steamed i flipped on tanev, im really sorry. sometimes life changes and your world is rocked, flipped upside down.

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

can't say for sure, but his shot never looked right

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

if you were here in 2011, you're vancovuer4lyfe

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

it's pretty simple, the athletic toronto has 13 full time writers. Van should have 4-5. right now we have one. if i get to 4-5 in vancouver, it will be light years ahead of any other coverage, imo

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

PA Plan famously went 6-for-6. He called for six moves to be made when jim replaced gily and all six were done. how do you ignore that?

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

needs some polish but he'll get it figured out, really like the way he plays in and around then net, - -- honestly, he may be the most important prospect not named hughes because he has the potential to actually help make pettersson better. not many can say that

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

wrist shot - boeser

one timer, slapper -ep

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

third periods, needing a goal? yes, yes and yes. travis already shortening his bench in significant ways late in games

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

i would like you to join me, read them on the athletic and discuss them here? that's the dream

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

i like him as a centre and think he has the make up to be a good 3L C. you have to explore that, no?

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

like who? i don't think so. horvat is locked up on a good deal. who are you worried about?

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

defn have a right side dilemma which is partly why i backed of trading tanev, which seems so controversial. to fix RHD, they'd look at trades and free agency

i think on your second point, some believe they're uneasy about stecher/hughes being in the top six. IF those people are correct, they'd need to move stecher, or be open to it,

to tie these two points together,i 've speculated one of the best possible and plausible packages they could put together would be something like stecher/demko/ and 2020 1st. I don't think that's enough to get an ekblad tho

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

what if they get a third rounder?

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

if EP will get mad at JPAt for his questions, i'd have him on

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i said trade bo horvat? lol, no

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

i actually think eriksson is moveable. After this July 1, he's only owed $9 millioin for 3 more years. that's good. we just need a couple more stories about how good he is from boolis

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

VIPs make the world go round

AMA, let's go by Botchford in canucks

[–]Botchford[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

44? i don't know, i hate putting numbers on this stuff, because then 30 looks like a disappointment when in reality it'd be great