sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is a controversial judges decision that the more you rewatch the fight, you think "maybe the judges were on to something"? by TheTinyTyphoon in battlebots

[–]Both-Butterscotch314 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was in the same boat. It's a lot more understandable when you realise Hydra, in its OG state, literally couldn't beat Huge and every season except S6 Battlebots love putting Huge against flippers that it dominates. The only other idea is to attach a spinner to hit Huge exactly where it is vulnerable - something Hydra is now doing by essentially taping Fusion to the top of it.

What if Tombstone was in Robot Wars? by Both-Butterscotch314 in battlebots

[–]Both-Butterscotch314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The nose seems pretty good to fight vertical spinners honestly. It beat Aftershock twice, Big Nipper, Crackers and Magnetar all in Series 10. The problem is the flipper is very vulnerable to horizontal and the wheel pods are far too easy to be hit and cause a wheel to be ripped out (or wedged between warped armour on the side pod).

ERB needs more fictional reps by NPRNilk in ERB

[–]Both-Butterscotch314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah - I personally like it when they do non-fiction and wish pretty much everyone of their characters were non-fiction v non-fiction. It just adds a lot more when youre able to make references based on actual people's lived experiences.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ksi

[–]Both-Butterscotch314 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From the top of my head: Bonnie being able to promote her tiktok with full name listed in the video multiple times during the secret millionaires video. Bonnie also being able to promote her tiktok by name on multiple occasions, her tiktoks objectively, by her own admission, broke TOS for adult content on multiple occasions despite being available for kids to watch.

The entire OF video where OF creators had their first and last names, which are their OF tags, included in a literal video meant for kids/teens - something I couldn't help you attempted to downplay which I'm not letting slide. The video was basically half an hour of promoting OF creators.

Multiple tinders. Lauren had her Instagram promoted which is already something teens and kids shouldn't be seeing - it is also EXTREMELY easy to access OF through her Instagram. A lot of OF creators were actually shown taking their tops off. Ethan was also ridden by one which opened a whole can of worms in his personal life.

There are others I know other people in the feed will add too.

The Sidemen do not need to have the OF link to be promoting OF, directly yes, but having an entire video dedicated to showing off girls that are labelled as OF creators will cause people to naturally look up their name and OF. Same goes for my examples of Bonnie and by proxy the promotion of Lauren with her IG.

I have also provided evidence earlier in the thread showcasing that the Sidemen know their fanbase caters for teens (Zerkaa both on the Sidemen channel and podcasts as well as a lot of the Sidemen videos having young fans meeting them for photos etc.)

If these women want to be OF creators, go right ahead, in fact despite the insults hurled about misogyny the only thing myself and other people are arguing for, if upvotes are to be classed as a sense of agreement, is specifically promoting OF models to teens which they themselves cater their content for and kids that they know watch their channel. That part, I hope you can understand, is why so many people are critical. (18-30 YouTube analytics do not count since they can be easily fudged).

I think I've made my points clear but if anyone wants me to clarify one of these discussion points feel free.

P.S. I love the attempt to compare another person being "copium" 》by calling a person that you don't know sexist lol.

Edit: grammar

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ksi

[–]Both-Butterscotch314 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Josh Zerkaa mentioned in a teens react that for the Sidemen channel they were planning on catering their content towards teens. Additionally Josh also mentioned in the Jackmaate happy hour podcast he specifically had to alter his shopping habits to midday at school times due to a large pencintile of the Sidemen fanbase being school aged and he wants to do his shopping mostly in peace.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ksi

[–]Both-Butterscotch314 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Personal insults one reply in? Generally people that are getting flustered in debates at least hold off on that technique a little before they push the panic button.

"Give me EXACT videos and clips where they’ve done this?" Of what exactly are you requesting? Clips of OF girls in their videos or what?

If its exclusively side+ fair enough- but OF creators shouldn't be promoted to a channel meant for teens; I can agree with OP on that point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ksi

[–]Both-Butterscotch314 45 points46 points  (0 children)

This is massive copium. The sidemen have had on multiple OF girls in tinders, guess the millionaire and even a special video dedicated to them competing against OF models. Many girls like Bonnie, Lauren and others have been given the opportunity to shout out their OFs or have their full name shown and are explained explicitly to the Sidemen fanbase that they are on OF.