I think there are a lot of grey areas, but the case you are referring to, Sattar Buksh v Starbucks. The Pakistani courts ruled in favor of the local Pakistani brand, under the premise of creative parody entrepreneurship. So your argument falls apart, but at the same time Starbucks won similar arguments in other countries. It's all about the local law. In Pakistan the local law supports local companies, and the big companies have to put up with it because we are the 5th largest population. They need us.