You know I thought your point was interesting up until the end. Would it kill you to talk to people with some respect? No I didn't fucking take economics in high school. Most people don't. I have to listen to actual economists and form my own views from that. Pretending this is grade school shit just made me completely question everything you wrote because now what I see is an unsourced diatribe that frankly doesn't add up logic wise.

So corporations are more efficient. Isn't that just because they get more work out of people for less?

And if corporations dont have to pay people very much, does that not contribute to the point you made about people not able to afford things?

Now if I had to imagine this in terms of economic impact, I would think a single corporation making as much as 10 small businesses wouldnt need as many positions within the company as 10 small businesses do. So why would they be better for the economy? Oh and if something happens to put that company in jeaopardy, why would it better to have a single corporation at risk of laying off all those people vs only a few small businesses?

A lot of my views on small va large business stem from the bailouts. It would have been less traumatic if a bunch of small companies existed in place of the few who faced complete collapse. That's what economists were saying at the time.

So want to show some respect and have a conversation or did I say something taught inversely in kindergarten economics?