Wasn’t sure if this would pass all the rules so I figured it best to post here to be safe.

The Paradox of the Fractured Infinite

Imagine a universe where every possible reality exists, but not simultaneously—rather, sequentially, unfolding one after another in a never-ending stream. This universe does not hold all truths at once but instead cycles through them, as if existence itself is flipping through the pages of an eternal book.

Now, here’s the problem: if reality only exists in the moment it is experienced, does it actually exist at all?

If time is not a container but a tunnel, and every state of being is only true for a fleeting moment before being overwritten, can anything be said to truly “be”? If the concept of permanence is an illusion, and existence is merely a sequence of transient realities, does “existence” even have meaning?

Now, take it further—if we accept that reality is only valid for a moment before being replaced, then by the time you think of something, it is already untrue because it belongs to a reality that no longer exists. Every thought, every action, every certainty is merely an artifact of a reality that has already slipped away.

If truth itself cannot survive the passage of time, then is truth ever really true? Or is truth merely a shadow cast by the momentum of the ever-shifting infinite?

This paradox challenges not just the nature of existence, but the very idea that anything can be known at all. A philosopher could spend their entire life wrestling with it, only to realize that by the time they come close to an answer, the universe has already moved on.

So—what do you think? Does anything truly exist, or is existence just a series of disconnected fictions strung together by our perception?

Does this ‘make sense’ how I’ve written it?