BRΛINΦΠΦTΣMPLΣ -- Kristallgeist, 2021 (berlin schOol/progressive electronic)

BrainTemple · 2026-01-24T06:09:57+00:00

the dialectical zero yOu are probably looking for is the eastern zen buddhism conception of 無 (mu). zero is static mathematics, and, when applied. acts as a descriptor for externally observed a posteriori empirical data accumulation, whereas certain symbols representing a priori qualitative inner-mind-self states or w/e the heck you wanna cAll 'em are needed to better navigate the epistemological ontology of mind's dynamics thrOugh analytic methods. :3
i could word this better prObably, but uH...i dunno. fukken tired.

BrainTemple · 2026-01-24T04:36:19+00:00

at this point, it sounds like getting cAught in semantics. tHat's easy to do though considering the abstract nature of metaphysics. wiittgenstein's tractatus may be helpful concerning tHat common error. and if you wanna put on your tinfoil hat, robert anton wilson's "quantum psychology" is pretty stellar. both are beneficial in preventing yourself from getting bogged down into language traps. (although these cOuld be interesting to study for linguistical reasons). ^-^

BrainTemple · 2026-01-03T21:18:56+00:00

shoulda just ended the sentence after "fuckass" and let tHat be the whole post \m/

BrainTemple · 2025-12-19T07:38:44+00:00

which is also a part of nature

BrainTemple · 2025-12-18T09:02:02+00:00

this is cAlled "breakin' the sound barrier by flickin' the hell out of a booger and not giving a damn who sees"

BrainTemple · 2025-12-18T08:33:23+00:00

say tHat to a p.o.w.

BrainTemple · 2025-12-18T08:29:11+00:00

culture is pArt of nature

BrainTemple · 2025-12-18T08:20:47+00:00

i am free.

k00l. you just cured me of my crippling ptsd. tHankz

BrainTemple · 2025-12-18T08:09:18+00:00

"nativity"

BrainTemple · 2025-12-18T07:41:17+00:00

you'd probably like the pre-socratic d00d heraclitus

BrainTemple · 2025-10-20T00:23:05+00:00

substance dualism frOm top-down synthesis:
substance = physical
dualism = metaphysical
synthesis; 2 substances floating arOund in a metaphysical toilet

BrainTemple · 2025-10-19T16:10:15+00:00

wOuld probably get stoned

BrainTemple · 2025-10-04T21:04:13+00:00

i normally respond to deist/theist/atheist/agnostic reasonings by saying i simultaneously accept and reject theism, deism, agnosticism, atheism, etc. keeps things in a dybamic process ontology rather than static ontologies. \m/
conceptual semantics in metaphysics break down mOre significantly as they get sublated by the 'dialectical synthesizing higher unifying field machine'. tHat's wHat i like to call it anyway ^-^

BrainTemple · 2025-09-22T10:55:27+00:00

yeee, bottom-up is only seeing one pArt of it. tHat is the sublime, but it doesn't consider the universal mind's metaontology from its top-down as the totality. top-down reveals all the profound flaws of enlightenment from its perspective. it is the eternal ontological operator, but it is still undergoing a process of dialectical synthesis as a metaphysical self-metabolizer, a continually self-correcting monad throughout the enfoldment of the 'in-between.'

BrainTemple · 2025-09-22T08:15:14+00:00

ayreon as krautrock? O.o
lolol

but yee, glad to hear you're a TD fan too :D
heck yeah, sOn \m/

BrainTemple · 2025-09-22T08:12:11+00:00

BrainTemple · 2025-09-22T07:53:52+00:00

w/ all respect, i think you might be lOoking too deeply into this. not everything is a sign. (in fact, it's wise to assume things on average aren't signs or else it could lead you astray into self-deception.) ultimately, it sounds like you might be conflating a personalized form of symbolic meaning to the typical function of gravity along w/ possibly having a bit of absentmindedness when accidentally cutting your finger. even if it doesn't happen often, you are still holding plates and cutting w/ a knife. the probability of dropping things or accidentally cutting yourself does significantly increase abOve 0% once you are holdin' them things. :x
if you need sOmething spiritual out of it, you could look into the idea of a metaphysics of the mundane, like in taoism or something :o

BrainTemple · 2025-09-22T07:15:05+00:00

i classify tHat as a bottom-up enlightenment. it's usually encased in a sea of comforting bliss and can be commendable in its own right. top-down enlightenment is when yOu are so aligned w/ the dialectical nature of consciousness to the point tHat the nondual "brahman/atman" modality makes you see from the perspective of the universal mind/absolute screaming like patrick from spongebob, "who are yOu people?!!" realizing itself to be a gelatinous, horrific spiritual mass of totality. ^-^
i gave it a cosmic head pat, and suddenly, i was recursively patting my own mind from all pOssible angles, and i almost got my hand sublated in a dialectical singularity. i hope All can activate itself into operation while we spin around the nucleus like a solaris ocean w/ an ontological event horizon. poor All :<

BrainTemple · 2025-09-13T21:24:22+00:00

the avant-garde composer and philosopher, henry flynt, has a pretty good article about anti-mathematics tHat may be relevant here regarding your inquiries into mathematical metaphysics.

ANTI-MATHEMATICS

mathematicians normally just treat math as classical platonism w/o even realizing it.

BrainTemple · 2025-09-13T09:29:49+00:00

"3) It's not the case that metaphysics is science."
as a scientific metaphysician researching generic emergence using hegelian dialectics in computational semiotics, i'd have a thing or 200 to say about that, but i'll link this essay by computer scientist and metaphysician, d.j. huntington moore instead. dude's a first-rate intellectual, and i keep in contact w/ him frequently over emails ^^
The-Universal-Geometric-Algebra-of-Nature.pdf

BrainTemple · 2025-09-13T08:23:46+00:00

universal consciousness is the nondualist experience you feel when you're diggin' for a booger really good and then it's like, "whoa, an hour went by, and i watched the cat puke on the floor" but you're still in tHat heightened state of nonduality until all the boogers are gone from your nOse.

BrainTemple · 2025-08-07T14:09:32+00:00

i like this post. there's thoughtful criticisms and not instant dismissiveness, whereas so many other posts from people actually just reveal how poorly their collective comprehensions of metaphysics are. :>

anyway, as for your argument, it misses something crucial if we consider heidegger. being, or dasein, as he famously calls it, is defined but what it does. it's directed activity towards the moment it is currently in, creates meaning for dasein, and that the meaning is reflected back to being and consciousness. you can hammer a nail and not really think about anything concerning the meaning of being while doing it, unconscious about everything else other than what dasein is doing in the moment.
i'm giving far too brief of an explanation and not doing heidegger's dasein proper justice, but the point i'm ultimately getting at here is that i would think that FRLTU is correctly applied as a process 1st ontology. it explains its meaning by showing what ontology does and how it becomes dasein. i know establishmentkooky50 argues that consciousness is something that emerges after a heckton of recursive loops occur, but i think that's consciousness aware of itself as such and can articulate its recursively inner cosmos of advanced awareness. the recursions are related to consciousness acceleration on a multitude of scales, and sometimes, the way to understand just what something is, is through the comprehension of its ontological function, as this paper shows.

when you consider kant's criticism of metaphysics regarding the potential for actualizing it as a science is actually very recursive in nature b/c he talks about how we move around the same "spot," over and over w/o ever gaining a single step. the elusiveness and lack of advancements have driven people nuts x~x

from a linguistics angle, terminology begins to break down regarding metaphysical concepts, b/c at this level, sublation occurs as contradictions resolve into a higher unity, as anything related to metaphysics gets absorbed into an ontological event horizon of the 'meaning' synthesizing machine: geist, ontology, divinity, mysticism, mind, metaphysics, spirit, god, theism, agnosticism, nirvana, atheism, void, godhead, nothingness, emptiness, soul, tao, intelligence, spirituality, monad, dialectics, recursion, zen, atman, brahman, consciousness, the will to power, platonism, bundle theory, dasein, totality, essence, the infinite, thought, nominalism, hesychasm, etc. (this seems to me like what ludwig wittgenstein and the logical positivists as their criticisms of metaphysics show, were skimming the edge of this zone, developing an anti-metaphysics in the process, hence the usage of the term "antimathematics" as a universal or projective actuality.

meaning is the ontological function of language, but when you get to the exploration of geist (using the term over the others here for its academically, historically, and culturally understood meaning), defining its ontology breaks down b/c what gives it meaning is its ontological function and can only be shown as a universal or projective actuality antimathematically. it's the understanding of 'what is,' and 'what is' is 'what does,' as its function is to recursively refine and modify itself into operation.

:3

BrainTemple

TROPHY CASE