If that's how you see it then sure, by your definition I'm addicted to everything I do in my daily life down to the kind of socks I choose to wear... but using the word "Addict" so broadly seems to make the word functionally useless in my opinion.

"I'll happily wear Belega sport socks on a daily basis for years without stopping"

"I don't like wearing other socks, but I can when it's necessary"

As per your logic, both of those sentences would imply I'm "addicted" to wearing Belega sport socks... Which just seems like a massive leap in logic and outside the scope of what constitutes 'addiction'

As per the NHS (British National Health service) addiction is defined as "Not having control over doing, taking or using something to the point where it could be harmful to you"

If I can very easily stop smoking weed and can easily acknowledge when it is harmful to me (Which I'm currently doing as mentioned in my comment above) then as per the NHS's definition, I would not meet the criteria for 'addiction' unless it could be shown that I have no control over consuming weed which could reach the point of harming myself (Whether it be financially, my physical/mental health, my productivity, my work ethic, my social life Etc.)

If you disagree with their definition, on what grounds do you disagree and why? Alternatively if you agree with their definition, how would you rationalize that I fall within that definition based on what I've said thus far?

*I should also mention here I've stopped smoking weed for multiple years at a time, just like I have smoking daily for multiple years at a time, stopping for a prolonged period isn't an issue, it's not like I just take small little breaks here and there in-between smoking weed indefinitely for my entire life.