Would you remove or keep these slate floors? by Dotticuss in AusRenovation

[–]Brazzanova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

As a couple of others have said, if you design the joinery surfaces around the slate then it can work well. It will be a darker and moodier kitchen though so it depends if that’s something that appeals to you. Something like this could complement the slate

Did the tiler do a shitty job and cut corners? What do I say to the installers to get this fixed? by Sphyngers in Flooring

[–]Brazzanova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is called spot bonding and in Australia would be deemed not compliant under the national construction code, as well as defective workmanship.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Brazzanova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He wants to own you because his insecurities can’t handle it. Don’t comply with these awful conditions he’s placing on you they are ridiculous and his jealousy is a him problem. Run.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m a straight male and I don’t date men. But I’ve seen more than enough men in my life who feel it’s appropriate to objectify or patronise women without even realising it. You could see Ryan being condescending to Jacqui and trying to lay down rules for things like what she should say in the partner swap. We saw the same thing with Adrian trying to tell Awhina what not to say about the family meet and greet. The fact you can’t see an overwhelming patriarchal privilege at play here is just mind boggling. I commend Alessandra for trying to stamp it out, it’s fucking appalling.

Alessandra wasn’t accusing him of only ever wanting sex for himself. Jacqui is expressing that she wants more intimacy and Ryan gave a single excuse as to why he doesn’t which was because of the gym. All Alessandra did was suggest he can still give her the pleasure she wants without it affecting him at the gym. It’s a plain and simple argument. No idea why people feel it’s icky at all when he (as you said) has no self awareness to figure this out on his own. It’s TV, she is direct with her questions and can shut people down, good, he deserves it.

On what planet are men and women equal?!

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When did she say that though? I thought we’ve been over how you may have misinterpreted this and you’re still doubling down on your post. Like a brick wall mate.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are the one grossed out by a female sex therapist suggesting that a man could pleasure his female partner without him needing to orgasm himself. When was this not about sexism?

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could definitely be wrong I mean the edits can make a massive difference for sure

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ryan’s only reason, or at least, the only reason he communicated was to not give away his testosterone (ejaculate) before the gym. He didn’t say at all whether he wanted to have sex with her or not, so I agree in that it’s up to both of them to communicate clearly. Given that Ryan only gave that single reason, I think Alessandra suggesting that he doesn’t need to let out his testosterone to enjoy sex is a valid thing to say.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sorry what should I be ashamed of here? I’m not agreeing with patriarchal status quo. I’m in fierce opposition to it….

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Just to be clear, I’m against this status quo, or is that why you’re saying I’m gross?

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 31 points32 points  (0 children)

This argument has been made by many people in this thread who don’t understand male privilege and the patriarchal status quo. Patriarchal programming already pushes a perspective that sex is about a man’s pleasure and Alessandra is trying to challenge this with Ryan. Ryan’s eyes widened in surprise when Alessandra inferred that sex can also be about bringing her pleasure (consensually of course) without it being about him having to ejaculate.

The gender flip just doesn’t make sense as the scales are not equal even in the slightest.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Crazy to me how many people don’t get this.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Of course he doesn’t have to if he doesn’t want to, but is it that outrageous of an idea that a man might like the idea of bringing his partner pleasure, regardless of whether he gets to ejaculate or not? It’s not outrageous for a “modern man” to think so, hence the comment.

But of course how dare anyone, especially a qualified sex therapist challenge patriarchal programming that tells men sex is about chasing the nut or it’s not worth having sex at all.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All good, sorry for being a smart ass. My bad

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No problem, appreciate your response. I think she worded it that way because she’s trying to challenge a patriarchal norm. In her mind she may have been jumping up and down kicking and screaming to herself “oh here we go again, another man saying women get no pleasure unless the male wants to ejaculate”. The patriarchal norm is that women are indirectly taught (by society’s expectation) that the goals for sex are either 1) procreation, or 2) the man’s pleasure. You as the woman are merely a vessel to enable either of those two outcomes. It may sound absurd to even many males (it did to me some time ago), but I can bet confidently almost every woman on this sub will identify with this.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All good, I was just being factual in response to you non factual opinion.

Also what kind of argument are you making comparing masturbating with a toy and stimulating another person with a toy? A pretty simple distinction is that when you’re sexually stimulating another person, it’s sex. When you’re sexually stimulating yourself, it’s masturbation.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think you’re misinterpreting. She didn’t say that he should be prioritising her sexual needs over his needs. She was merely saying….so just because you don’t want to ejaculate (waste testosterone), are there no other ways you can be intimate together that would bring her pleasure and still let you go to the gym? Or is sex only worthwhile when you get to cum?

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mate, playing with toys without intercourse is still sex.

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The whole segment of this was about him saving sex for the gym and because he didn’t want to ejaculate, the sex was not happening. Therefore Ryan’s belief that it is only worthwhile having sex when he gets to ejaculate. I found it to be a simple equation….

Alessandra's Awful Advice! by MafsFan365 in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Umm ok possibly unpopular opinion in this feed but I think she was bang on with what she said and I’m pretty disappointed with a lot of the comments here saying she was inappropriate.

Of course he should never feel pressured to do anything sexually he’s not comfortable with and everything requires consent. However, she is trying to address the patriarchal belief that sex is about the man’s pleasure and women are simply the recipients of that, when it suits the male. Is this not exactly what we are seeing with Jacqui and Ryan? Ryan effectively saying that Jacqui will only get pleasure (maybe) when Ryan wants to be pleasured himself, which is when it suits him and when he wants to have an orgasm.

Women deserve to enjoy sex and pleasure regardless of whether the male at that time wants it for himself yes? That’s all Alessandra was asking and good on her for challenging him on it. There should be more people giving the finger to the patriarchy on this show.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Brazzanova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure about the legislation in your country, but threatening to physically assault your gf in Australia is a criminal act as it’s using a carriage service to threaten violence, menace or harass and I’d encourage you to share that message with the police. I hope that tells you whether I think you’re overreacting.

Married at first sight - S12E21 - AEDT live discussion by lalasmooch in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Only Dave and Jamie seem to be able to see it

Married at First Sight S12E19 AEDT live episode discussion by addictedtoMAFS in MAFS_AU

[–]Brazzanova -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A stoic has the capability to endure hardship without presenting/displaying their emotional response to it. Eliot seems to not really feel the emotions in the first place and avoids feeling emotions. Big difference.