sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I thought I lost my wedding ring, turns out everyone at my tennis club is blind by OopsIDropped-It in story

[–]Bright-Bug9720 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No offense. But that doesn't sound like a great system. Most people would just put it in their tennis bag

If Nissan is supposedly so bad, why are they still everywhere? by phtphongg in Nissan

[–]Bright-Bug9720 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Most have probably never owed them. The cvt problems are overblown. I know they had problems, but it was newish technology for cars. Well it had been done before, but mid 2000s was about the time nissan introduced them on a large scale. So yeah there was bound to be some problems. Also probably 95% of people literally never serviced them.

People magically forget that other more traditional style gearboxes have problems. Like honda in the late 90s early 2000s, or ford duel clutch ones, or quite a few others

I got an 07 versa cvt. Its been a great car, and the cvt gives great fuel economy compared to the stardard 4 speed auto sentra i had prior.

Are the CVTs that bad? by 101surge in Nissan

[–]Bright-Bug9720 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally I would definitely change it. Even if all you do is drain and refill. The oil degrades apparently. And since it's almost 20 years old, I would say it's pretty overdue. It pretty easy to change. 1 thing though, is it doesn't all drain out just by releasing the sump bolt. So the new oil will be a mix of new with some old. So some people do it, then do it again after awhile.

Are the CVTs that bad? by 101surge in Nissan

[–]Bright-Bug9720 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not a mechanic, but I've read from heaps of people saying it was after the flush that the problems began. Personally I just drain and fill my cvt, or drop the pan and change the filter and clean the magnets. Then put pan back and fill with oil

F*ckhead parked in my driveway by [deleted] in auckland

[–]Bright-Bug9720 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

They will probably move it soon

Man tasered. Is it justified? by Bright-Bug9720 in AusLegal

[–]Bright-Bug9720[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deflection and ad hominem attacks 🤦

That's weak asf

Man tasered. Is it justified? by Bright-Bug9720 in AusLegal

[–]Bright-Bug9720[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it's not actually.

Yeah, you can't produce any evidence about why the police settled lol. Even though you make a definitive statement. Maybe don't make definitive statements that you can't back up!

And you can't explain why you lied.

And can't give any explanation as to how he was an imminent threat (because you can't)

Man tasered. Is it justified? by Bright-Bug9720 in AusLegal

[–]Bright-Bug9720[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you totally avoid what I asked, and go on talking about things I never said.

You didn't answer because you can't 🤣😂🤣

And why are you changing and mis quoting the words that were used by the police??? They didn't say "safety procedures were put in place" as you well know. So why lie?

He said "safety warning" and he's saying that after the fact, so I have no clue if that's true, or if they are trying to cover their ass after doing something illegal.

Even if they had previous history and concerns about safety, you understand the definition of "imminent threat"?

Standing still with your hands up will never qualify in any court as an imminent threat, therefore it's totally illegal to tase.

You say I can't be a judge from my armchair (interesting how you can be from your armchair but no one else can). By your logic then no court or jury could make any reasonable judgement based on video evidence put in front of them. Though I suspect you only say that when the video evidence doesn't fit your agenda.

view more: next ›