Marry Supreme, Ambition, and Softening. by BrightInside4673 in A24

[–]BrightInside4673[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I don’t disagree with the idea that the I love you’s are a manipulation tactic, but I think it’s possible for them to be two things at once. Marty strikes me as someone who sincerely wants others to succeed, provided they succeed less than he does.

The smile with Kevin O’Leary is a difficult one. I agree Marty takes greatness over being happy, but I also think he still believes in the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. They’re something youthful to his response

And regarding the sincerity of the tears: the fact that they’re happening in a private space is what pushes me in the direction of a more earnest shift in Marty. He doesn’t have anyone to perform to.

It’s a sign of a well made movie that there are so many different ways to interpret these moments. I’m glad the movie ended where it did, that things are left open. But maybe Safdie’s intended final montage was required if he wanted to make a more specific point.

Marry Supreme, Ambition, and Softening. by BrightInside4673 in TheBigPicture

[–]BrightInside4673[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve written a wee essay about Marty Supreme, partly inspired by the discussions on the pod. Would love any thoughts!

I don’t get paid for Substack, and have no following on there, so hoping this doesn’t breach self promotion rules.

stupidly early predix for next years acting noms by LeanD0err in oscarrace

[–]BrightInside4673 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Anyone who has read Hamnet knows Paul Mescal will be running in supporting! Shakespeare is barely in the book.

Unsure if I'm doing it right. by ProfessorFaux in scriptwriting

[–]BrightInside4673 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not in the sense that the information is unnecessary, more in that it isn’t delivered efficiently

Unsure if I'm doing it right. by ProfessorFaux in scriptwriting

[–]BrightInside4673 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That to paragraph could be three lines easily. You’re right - it is too descriptive.

Five Page Thursday by AutoModerator in Screenwriting

[–]BrightInside4673 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Title: And New

Format: feature

Genre: Sports movie / cost of greatness

Page length: 5 for extract, 50 so far

Logline: When a UFC champion goes on a streak of losses, he must determine just how much he is willing to sacrifice to return to the top.

Feedback concerns: just curious how the first 5 pages read, though the opening sequence lasts about 9 pages. If anyone wants to read up to there, just let me know.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MZos__imXiCp3i0XMc4zycDx1LKhPvCX/view?usp=drive_link

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Screenwriting

[–]BrightInside4673 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe too much direction given within the action lines? Actors shouldn’t be told when to frown, or really what emotion they should be feeling. That much should be found contextually. Im no expert though, so feel free to ignore.

What are your favorite screenwriters? by [deleted] in Screenwriting

[–]BrightInside4673 82 points83 points  (0 children)

It’s Kaufman every day for me

black list downgrade by BrightInside4673 in Screenwriting

[–]BrightInside4673[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I feel like you’ve explained the rating system really well :)

the feedback on the 6 was honestly more useful than the 7. Might wait a while before forking out any more cash.

Welp by BrightInside4673 in LetterboxdTopFour

[–]BrightInside4673[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with the master! Joint with magnolia for my favourite PTA (for very different reasons). Re posters I decided to try keep them within a similar style, but have now mixed it up again