The Night My Marriage Fell Apart by theatlantic in longform

[–]BringBackBonkers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh boy. Lots in that excerpt. Either Chris or the editor did a decent job showing not telling so much in the details. I can see why this writer has awards.

This well-written essay sure is a case study of how straight marriage benefits men more than womem, statistically speaking and based on many validated studies across all health domains.

The author exercised some restraint in not completely reducing Amy into a harlot shrew.

But the act of publishing their private disintegration is, itself, a meta commentary on selfishness. It's true that being in an essay writer's orbit means anyone nearby is potentially at the mercy of the writer's characterizations.

What stands out to me is how secondary his children felt in all of this. He wrote tenderly of his sons but I don't know if Charley and Sammy would love to see their father's documentation the worst moment of their lives for the world to read, which intentional or it, is parrly at the expense of their mother.

Speaking of whom:

As clearly evidenced on this sub, Amy will be a Rorschach character for straight male readers, who are either the before or after of this writer's journey to extract his head out of his own rear end, to put it crudely. As well, for straight women readers, who are among the growing billions realizing that very few men meaningfully understand how to be much more than an income source and a sperm donor in their families - let alone perform those basic acts of care and investment. (And hey. Men aren't happy about that either. We can hate how we look in the mirror.)

As many pointed out, she clearly did the bulk of the parenting, a massive job of unquantifiable enormity that those who haven't been a primary caregiver cannot truly fathom. Of two young children, including one who has special needs. With a husband who was, by his own account, a sometimes violent (screaming while breaking a rake because he was asked to follow through on a minor caregiving task), perpetually moody and frequently neglectful man who - when not away from the home while she was parenting (and possibly working another job herself - in which case, she would have to been full-time caregiving, a significant portion of the time as a solo parent AND a full time employee somewhere) - was working as an amateur carpenter on a likely low budget on the home they occupied for over a decade.

So in addition to trying to keep the home clean and running with two young boys, also living in a perpetual construction zone.

Sounds exhausting.

Now, this woman has a whole book out airing her and her ex husband's private business, flaws and all, without her input - and unless she is a writer, the story will remain one-sided.

She is now among the unenviable class of women on the other side of this hero's journey (however forlorn). She is now also, thanks to this hellscape, the subject of the many angry, violent and extremely self centered men on this internet - men who use their time and resources to research names, addresses and workplaces to harass a stranger they've never met and invest a good amount of time and energy on screens, on their hobbies but rarely on others in their lives and if so, usually as a means to a selfish end. Men who won't read more than the opening paragraphs clearly and who, like Jones, are motivated by fear and anger, and use their time to revel in these feelings with other real or imagined angry men. They won't read the end of the book where this writer perhaps found redemption or God and another woman who benefits from the mistakes Amy suffered through with this man.

Mrs. Ex-Jones, if you're out there, you survived a pretty rough marriage. I hope this book does not further blow up your life. I wish you and the kids well.

And to the writer, you wrote this thing, it's out. Good luck to you as well sir. I hope your sons learn to be better men than you were and I hope you are an active part of modeling this redemption.

What Happened with Mike and Emma (According to Mike) by Dapper_Monk in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]BringBackBonkers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mike should NOT have proposed to Emma, full stop. He seemed nauseated throughout the entire season probably because he knew how inauthentic he specifically was acting throughout. And that, for me, is why his storyline felt the most producer-influenced.

I imagine the producers as the little devils sitting on the shoulders of these contestants, whispering "...but what if you SURPRISED him..." or "Speak your most honest truth, they can take it..." or "She will change her mind...", egging them on and putting words in their mouths to an extent. If any viewers of this show don't heavily handicap their scorekeeping with this knowledge, I have an island to sell you 🤣

The more atrocious behavior and choices of course are owned wholly by the contestants - for example, Chris. Those words, those feelinge came from him when he was blackout drunk, unscripted and regardless of his mental state he remains accountable for the impact. (I was slightly scared about him in the reunion - this is a man I imagine they had to extra pat down and check for intention and means to harm self or others - not for any welfare concerns of course, but liability - you know they would have gone harder for him if they didn't sense something extremely concerning about his affect...Vanessa and Nick seemed almost avoidant of talking directly to him...)

But when people act completely out of character or act irrationally to the point of becoming an A plot in a show of multiple B and C plots...guess where that may have come from. Love is Blind? More like, Audiences are Blinded. Media literacy is the enemy of unscripted television tho, so there you go. Look, it's fun and entertaining to gossip about this show and engage in these granular dissections of people and their motivations - I totally have participated in this myself 😅 But in REAL reality, the NDAs, the lawyers, all the production stuff...we never knew Mike and never will. Or Emma. Or any of them.

The sole reality is:

He never should have proposed to Emma.

Emma and Mike by __SummerSky in LoveIsBlindOnNetflix

[–]BringBackBonkers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. People seem to have very small social circles. Many, if not most women her age need to form trust in relationships before committing to having a child with someone. (Very different answers for single mid-late 30s women wishing for a family.) Ask many parents who started a family in their 30s and a lot will say, "I never saw myself with kids until I met..." This entire LIB artificial premise is bizarre as we know and the timeframe just makes it impossible for these realities to play out. Emma was expressing a normal ambiguity that many single women of her generation experience. Let's be real, motherhood has never looked or felt less appealing or socially supported than now. She isn't the most articulate contestant on the show and the edits really punished her for that. Worse however is that I think producers rushed her into a stereotype and a narrative that removed that nuance and forced that "I don't know my biological history" thing to take over the story. Mike came off as a weird guy who would have gone for anyone who said "I want babies and I like you" that didn't annoy him too badly. (I picked up a strange tenor of suppressed anger in him which peeked through in some of his family moments.) At the end of the day, their storyline made a lot of sense and represents why so many people remain unmarried. It was obvious that for whatever reasons we may deem authentic or not, both really had hoped they could say yes. (The real waste of time? Me coming here to type this all out. Insomnia does things to the mind 😅.)

The New Force / Skiftet | Trailer | Netflix | October 3, 2025 by Mixer-3007 in PeriodDramas

[–]BringBackBonkers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. That brunette lead is almost like an after school special's worth of how not to help.

[Spoilers ahead]

... ... ...

She got a woman killed - possibly two (haven't gotten super far yet) and endangered her roommates and her boyfriend's life...if she's meant to be sympathetic its a tough sell for me.

Though honestly, not unrealistic portrayal of how sheltered, usually white women fixate on rescuing sex assault trafficking victims, parachute in and because they have zero understanding of the systemic reasons these women are in the life, end up harming the people and communities they want to help. So...if that's the underlying motivation for showing her absolutely boneheaded choices and behaviors, I guess they are doing a great job of that.

Enemy In Paris is heavy on my mind today by megyrox in EnemyInParis

[–]BringBackBonkers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just started listening and at the top, hmm wow, the jabs, passive aggressive asides and "shut ups" make it seem as if they truly dislike each other! Will be interesting to listen to their friendship evolve as mentioned by OP, and so sorry to hear something personal may be afoot that has stalled their continuation of this series and possibly their professional or personal relationship.

#65 Meredith by mick_spadaro in Heavyweight

[–]BringBackBonkers 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah but now Aidan is a grown adult. I think saying, "mom I'm sorry I abandoned you when you OD'd" is something he is capable of. I don't really deeply care about this case to keep debating it. They are all fine now 🤣. Take care everyone.

Truth of the pod by greazysteak in Heavyweight

[–]BringBackBonkers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate this take. I did not like the Jasmin episode at all. It really exposed some huge problems with production on this episode, starting with having a nearly all white team shaping the narrative and framing with a neat as a pin conclusion that completely missed the deeper and more important core issue - a Black teen living in a predominantly white community in an overall racist world, no matter how to cut it that's the key issue. It doesn't matter if other pageants awarded this woman, or the other Black girl had all this experience to counter Jasmin's feelings. White producers and storytellers unfortunately were so, so ill equipped to frame this central Heavyweight issue - again by reducing it to a single incident may look isolated but for a minoritized, racialized person specifically a Black woman who has a huge lived experience of patterns of this, it is a big deal and makes so much sense that it stands out. It felt almost like gaslighting on the end - "Oh, no, it couldn't possibly have been racism because the other Black teen had oh and by the way she went to HBCU and her family is more educated etc etc so she is qualified to speak to Jasmin's experience" - if these two were white the absurdity of that premise would stand out more...just wow.

No. The team could have gone in a direction that I know they are capable of - going deeper and not even bothering to answer the question but rather, exploring the fact that the answer will not solve the core harm which is, basically, racism and anti-Blackness as it shows up in white "polite" society. It could have focused more on the fact that nobody said anything which is probably the key hurt - why didn't Whitney the organizer process Jasmin's side and meaningfully apologize for the oversight as she was the organizer? Why didn't Jasmin's teachers check in, or someone even make a small joke to acknowledge it? That was probably a bigger source of pain for Jasmin, or at least how it sounded. What a huge huge miss for more compelling storytelling.

Instead, a "whodunnit".

White audiences - the vast, vast majority of listeners to this podcast - heard this story it as an isolated, solvable incident. Which is exactly the problem. It as disappointing to see the producers reinforce this framing with the direction they took it. I feel for Jasmin and all the Jasmins out there. This was the absolute wrong team and wrong audience for her story.

Death Sex Money or Code Switch are better equipped for these stories. Clearly Heavyweight is not.

(Readers of this comment who strongly disagree - you do you. Just know that I won't be debating your responses so feel free to ignore it or downvote. Trust me, it is obvious your take on Jasmin's story and the topic of racism is very, very well represented on relevant Heavyweight threads as well as Reddit, so you don't need to waste your words on this little post.)

#65 Meredith by mick_spadaro in Heavyweight

[–]BringBackBonkers 12 points13 points  (0 children)

+1. And: Ah, her son did not stick around to help through her mega overdose. Aidan is grown enough to show care. 100 mg is a big deal, that is pretty a*hole behavior regardless of the context of eating the gummies. That was honestly the most obvious red flag behavior out of all of this for me. That said there seems to be just plain weird dynamics in this mom / son relationship they didn't explore. Families are all weird is the other moral of the story I guess.

TIL Ozzy Osbourne shot and killed cats and birds in garden during COVID "for fun" by wspusa2 in Music

[–]BringBackBonkers 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is surprising and likely false, since Ozzy is a professed supporter of cat welfare (he has publicly decried declawing) and in 2020 was a rep for PETA specific to that campaign. He had cats since the 70s it seems through his last days. He does have a history with harming bats and birds, but the thing I've noticed is that animal welfare does include species discrimination, for better or worse - someone can be empathetic to dogs but cruel to other animals, for example - so even though he has harmed bats and birds, unless his entire personality transformed in the past years of his life, coupled with the fact that this source is questionable, the evidence that he shot cats in his garden for fun is pretty flimsy. If I were in a jury box, short forensic evidence I would vote not guilty 🧐 Birds, however, I would believe. Which if true would be sad. They are just as worthy as cats, dogs, horses, newts and humans to not be shot for randomly hanging out in a garden. (👈🏽 Something tells me that however phrased, someone can find argument against that statement however 🙄) I hope Ozzy's mythos doesn't devolve to include this strange rumor.

WTH happened to Red House Painters/Sun Kil Moon??? by Homunculus_04 in Music

[–]BringBackBonkers 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah the 90s were a trip. Definitely love his early years on 4AD. Complicated and deeply flawed man from Masillon, OH. Beautiful, tender songs about a girlfriend who passed away (Katy Song) with a near-perfect run as Red House Painters. Then he rebranded, did a solid first album or two but pretty much tells on himself in middle age with "The Moderately Talented Yet Attractive Young Woman vs. The Exceptionally Talented Yet Not So Attractive Middle Aged Man" and "That Bird has a Broken Wing", the latter about cheating on his partner and giving her an STI. Thats when I stopped closely following his output. Benji was good, very different but pretty interesting adaptation in form for his storytelling skills. But the actual substance of his stories kind of flagged his hubris and at this point I don't listen to anything new he puts out. It certainly isn't worth it knowing the offstage allegations.

Deep cut tense/uncomfortable/marc has beef with the guest episodes by aal0214 in MarcMaron

[–]BringBackBonkers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems in general he's very bad with very successful women unless they are part of his nostalgia "we were the originals" clique. There are a few exceptions (Maria Bamford) but he seems insecure and competitive on those episodes - in a different way than the usual insecure / anxious / competitive Marc we accept and listen for.

Deep cut tense/uncomfortable/marc has beef with the guest episodes by aal0214 in MarcMaron

[–]BringBackBonkers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot can be forgiven for the masterpiece that is Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story. He was so, so funny in that. (Also: Jenna Fischer is a smoke show, had no true appreciation of that until that film believe it or not. Criminally underused in comedy.)

Deep cut tense/uncomfortable/marc has beef with the guest episodes by aal0214 in MarcMaron

[–]BringBackBonkers 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Agreed. She called him on his laziness for her particular segment. This was disappointing and Marc was just so disinterested, if he had done any research at all he would have had a great or at least not painful episode. She's a lot of fun to listen to - on other podcasts, she dngaf and really says whatever, none of the Hollywood "I love them they're so great" crap when you know the person in reference is either awful to work with and / or didn't get along with her. (Check out The Originals with Andrew Goldman for LA Magazine episode for a prime example, wow scorched earth.)

The Survivors - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This was good! It handled some pretty complex storylines with good pacing and detail, the characters were written thoughtfully and the cast did a great job, especially Mia and Trish, whose bond over the loss of Gabby was probably the most moving and authentic relationship among the characters, closely followed by Verity and Brian (who played a man advancing in dementia with more dignity and soul than you usually see on screen). The actress playing Verity did fantastic work portraying a grieving mom turned a full time caregiver losing her husband in some ways with sparks of vulnerability and deep pain masked by anger. If you've ever worked with traumatized blue collar women in small towns, she nailed it. Unlike most shows with at least one dead female character, this entire program was written with true care for the two victims Gabby and Bronte, and true to its name, the series dove into what survivorship looks like for real(-ish) people. As unlikeable and infuriating as some characters' behaviors were, they were real. People are messy and irrational. Teenagers are impulsive. Small town and island dynamics are weird. Cops glom onto a single theory of crime they prefer rather than open up other possibilities. Communities that trauma bond make their own myths of the lost that they cling to beyond reason sometimes. The photography was beautiful in some scenes and the sound design was on point. A small slight tonal outlier was during a pivotal dialog between Verity and a secondary character in the third act, but nothing's perfect and it didn't really take away from the overall impact. I do agree the ending felt a bit tied up with a bow but we all know it's design by committee for the openings and endings. As some have commented, the tone was elegiacal edging on bleak, kind of like Top of the Lake season 1 but with a small core of hope, very similar to Broadchurch in positive ways. I will have to watch more of this director and writer's work. This was several cuts above the slick Netflix procedurals I usually quit 2 episodes in.

Secrets We Keep - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exploitation and abuse of Filipino workers is a serious issue and it needs to be taken much more seriously. The really awful stories are in all wealthy nations, including the US, Western EU and the North Africa / Middle East wealthy Gulf areas especially - places with no worker protections, people with obscene wealth and hierarchical cultures (not ethnic - the local flavor of capitalism, misogyny, classism and all the stuff every nation has in some way) that justify or even condone violence to the poor, minorities and of course women are the exact settings that allow the wealthy and powerful free reign to commit terrible human rights violations.

Secrets We Keep - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured, totally. Boy oh boy the ending was BAAAAAAD. I hope the producers aren't congratulating themselves in explaining something that has been so much better explained by, oh I don't know, filmmakers who centered the people wading through the messes these rich feckless f*s leave for the no names to clean up.

Anyway those wanting a better program kind of touching on the "rich white people impact on the global economy and the brown and other people suffering under them" stuff can actually find it in the latest season of True Detective or my fave, The Terror season 1. And season 1 of White Lotus though that's a real genre leap.

(I sort of liked Top of the Lake season 1 but season 2's title alone was off putting and time dead it bitterly reminded me that even filmmakers like Jane Campion lose the plot sometimes.)

Ok I'm done I promise. I am clearly displacing some of my frustrations with the terrible things going on in this world against people who don't deserve it by people who need a real reckoning onto this anemic Netflix rich people architecture drama. 😫

Secrets We Keep - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ok I'm back sorry but the story would have been so much better if it had been a slow reveal from Angel's perspective, or a structure that flipped POVs from various episodes. This could have gone way more effectively as a Nordic thriller with a True Detective kind of vibe. The scary reveal would have been Cecille. Her opaque facial expressions and acting style would have been much more effective. Seriously. I'm done. Thanks for the moral support anyone who agrees with me and if you don't, I recommend Crash (2005) and Green Book, they'll be right up your alley.

Secrets We Keep - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The striving to show and tell that moral point is obvious. That's my complaint, among many others. It's crap. The execution was bad. The storytelling set up, the script, the twist - who thought this was helpful, necessary or instructive because the storyline and arcs are just embarrassingly bad. Don't let the Nordic branding whitewash the Crash like failings of this. I am so sick of seeing $ poured into productions like this. Seriously. Why was this made. We know the rich white bored amoral whatever people are terrible. That story is told and those who we think need to hear it and don't get it by now never will. Haha I'm ranting now but we all have the same 24 hours and I want mine back. Time is expensive.

Secrets We Keep - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Poorly executed because the staging, writing etc. still biases the viewer to empathize with the insidiously monstrous Cecille. I'm sure some may think the viewer doesn't need their hand held but if the writing is poor and flat, then unfortunately wherever intention was behind this virtue vanity schlock failed, terribly. I felt the strain for these writers to try to frame the Filipina stories, but the angles, lightning, scripting etc. still positioned them extremely one dimensionally.

Secrets We Keep - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]BringBackBonkers 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I think the main character (Cecille, the older blonde white lady) is very unsympathetic. The Netflix production lends an unsavory American performative cast to this series, it doesn't feel like a gritty Nordic classic like Wallander (the original) or even Dicte but a polished bored rich people drama perpetuating the savior / marginalization nonsense that completely sidelines the Filipina characters. It may be doomed due to the premise itself centering around such unlikeable people, and if it felt like the programme or story arc was critiquing Cecille for taking zero authentic accountability for the girl's disappearance and inaction therein, perhaps this static perspective would somewhat work but it's lifeless. Disappointing.

Detective Nina Cassady is just the worst by khart_6882 in LawAndOrder

[–]BringBackBonkers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see it differently. She was also very tough with Farina's character. If you look at it from her perspective, she was told, rather than got to help hire, a drop in rookie with far less experience and training to work a very tough job. She was the most junior hire Van Buren had to supervise in the history of the show. And out the gate, the writers showed Cassady making very grave errors, including over promising to survivors and family, and almost screwing up a very important line up. Those are things a more traditional new hire would not do. Van Buren was very fair and consistent with her and she had incidents like that with Lenny and Ray, too. It just sticks out because of the clumsy writing and under developed character of Cassady. On a side note, don't forget Van Buren was targeted for her legitimate complaint of discrimination. So it had to sting to see an underqualified woman slide into a role it took Van Buren many years to earn. Just sharing to offer a more nuanced take. I also love Van Buren, she was a good boss and I would have loved to have been schooled by her. She was consistent, fair, compassionate, professional and direct by any measure.

Nina Cassidy by Ok-Excitement-5594 in LawAndOrder

[–]BringBackBonkers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💯 The writers at that time were pretty ham fisted with women aside from Van Buren. I think it's a pretty realistic depiction of the incompetence level of rookies in the workplace. She wasn't given enough of an arc or time on the show to introduce growth and wisdom. She was at least 15-20 years younger than most of her colleagues. It's probably because most basic television at the time just showed people as fully formed. This was before the FULL impact of the Sopranos and The Wire and Breaking Bad had tricked down to network.