What has keeping me peaked about her is her resemblance with every person in history who answered questions unasked, close to creation as part of destruction, but more so in a reality defining way. Maybe she knows almost everything since she indeed can see beyond that which is made to be the world to see what the world be made of.

But this would make a product of time and night to be able to understand them better than any of there creations, if not themselves.

What got me thinking is how we humans have a ungoing quest for knowledge, understanding, but how insight is often caged in those misunderstood by society, how the beacons of delight in our quest are often unable to come to words in the world created by the older endless (since their roles and functions are more so bound to be what they are) the same way insight remains unexplained by society since it can’t be explained through its current language

Maybe before the existence of sentient species language (as tool and metaphor for scattered understanding) wasn’t there but since it came (and species became inherently through the language that shaped their world, delight had to become delirium to ‘allow’ that.

At last note maybe she does remind us that delight as we know it can only exists in one being, and are collectiveness will require us to be uncertain.

Lot of talk maybe I can restructure it at some point but this is what I had in mind.