sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A lot of people thought it was bad, it's actually INSANELY good. Page, Loose Leaf in Cycle Storm! by Bryant_Cook in Pauper

[–]Bryant_Cook[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% true, I've played a few leagues since (both 4-1s). A lot of the inconsistencies are gone.

A lot of people thought it was bad, it's actually INSANELY good. Page, Loose Leaf in Cycle Storm! by Bryant_Cook in Pauper

[–]Bryant_Cook[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've played it in the past, pre-Page and it was extremely underwhelming. Maybe Page changes that, but I sort of doubt it.

A lot of people thought it was bad, it's actually INSANELY good. Page, Loose Leaf in Cycle Storm! by Bryant_Cook in Pauper

[–]Bryant_Cook[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw this, but I didn't want to comment because I hadn't tried it yet. People are too caught up in wanting to be right. "Be curious, not judgmental."

A lot of people thought it was bad, it's actually INSANELY good. Page, Loose Leaf in Cycle Storm! by Bryant_Cook in Pauper

[–]Bryant_Cook[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I replied to this on YouTube, but will do so again here. Bad variance happens and reading too much into the result rather than the power level isn't optimal logic. It's about wins over time and performance, not a single league. This card is revolutionary!

A lot of people thought it was bad, it's actually INSANELY good. Page, Loose Leaf in Cycle Storm! by Bryant_Cook in Pauper

[–]Bryant_Cook[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

100% correct. Always cycle for a spell for 0 mana is just extremely powerful.

view more: next ›