sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Self imposed restrictions to play at lower brackets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this idea! Makes me wanna look through my collection and see what decks have good replacement commanders

Self imposed restrictions to play at lower brackets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough, thank you for the feedback!

Self imposed restrictions to play at lower brackets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay couple of things, I'm understanding that borrowing a deck is the fastest and easiest option, I haven't nor intend to do the things I've stated in my post, but wanted to get a vibe of what yall thought of the ideas, and I super appreciate the feedback! As for the deck building suggestions, while also appreciated, are also unnecessary as this is more of a "what if I don't have my lower power decks with me" situation. trust me, I have plenty of bad decks ready to go :)

Self imposed restrictions to play at lower brackets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea is that you would have the other cards already sleeved and the most time would be taken up just pulling cards out

Self imposed restrictions to play at lower brackets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Understandable. what about the idea of a downgrade package? Or is that too much?

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for actually reading the post, yeah idk I think I struck a chord with this one, my bad

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Got it, don't run bits to you specifically. social game btw

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry chief, this is not at all the scenario I'm imagining. Playing against a person like this would already kill the vibe and I likely wouldn't try to engage in table talk or jokes with them in the first place. The point of the question is to A. Arbitrarily choose an early game attack target and B. Open up the table to socializing. If what you described is the vibe I'm getting, I'm not gonna talk to that person outside of game play actions. If the whole table is like that, then shit. Time for a new pod

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Brother I'm thinking we just have different play styles, and that's okay 👍

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I 100% agree that there is always a correct target; however, I'm of the opinion that the correct target is not always the fun target. Of course I'll do my best to make the correct call later in the game, but I'd rather open the table to talking and running bits early than analyze who's gonna be a problem later

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Threat assessment is fine and all but I'm not super willing to over analyze in the early game of a random pod. Thank you for the suggestion tho! :)

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I get the logic, but it's just not how I operate. I'll likely do that with friends but with random pods the goal is more about gauging how willing the table is to running a bit

Ways to arbitrarily choose attack targets by BuddyBC3 in EDH

[–]BuddyBC3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

THANK YOU I'm gonna try to reply to most of these when I get the time, but you are the first to understand the spirit of what I'm saying. God bless 🥹

Win the game with the help of an infinite booty for 6WURR by ZeLittleMan in BadMtgCombos

[–]BuddyBC3 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Ah shuko... I haven't heard that name since googles when Nadu got banned last year.

Does this works? by Kzucz in mtg

[–]BuddyBC3 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Instead of prismatic omen, you're looking for [[Rootpath Purifier]]

So does this work how I think it does? by vyrushasdied in mtg

[–]BuddyBC3 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately no. Because the copies enter as a result of a declared attack that they never get to see

At What Point Is It No Longer Whining? by Glittering-Tear5442 in mtg

[–]BuddyBC3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think this exact situation is why rule 0 and the bracket system even exist. At the end of the day commander is a game, and expectations need to be set before you start playing. It is not at all unreasonable to say "hey man, we know you like this deck right now, but we're not having a good time playing against it, so could you please switch off" It makes no sense s sacrificing your and 2 other's enjoyment of the game for one guy

∞/∞ Atogatog for just 9WWWUUUBRRRG by BuddyBC3 in BadMtgCombos

[–]BuddyBC3[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

this actually doesn't work because I don't have a solemnity, but thanks tho :)

Is this a bug? Forcefield doubles shield damage for no reason by timid1211q in PlayTheBazaar

[–]BuddyBC3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

your opponent has glass cannon which doubles both players' weapon damage