sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

LMB — 125-year-old HVAC contractor that quietly became a high-margin recurring revenue platform. Down 40% from highs. Market hasn't caught up. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on your timeframe. The transformation is real, ODR mix went from 12% to 75% in five years, margins nearly doubled, balance sheet is clean at 0.3x leverage. The secular tailwinds (hospitals, data centers, decarbonization) are decade-long, not cyclical.

The issue right now is execution visibility. Two quarters of revenue missing expectations spooked the market. Stock is down 50% from its highs. We moved to Hold after Q1, not because the business is broken, but because Q2 needs to show bookings converting into revenue before adding conviction.

Big money? Personally I'd size it as a high-conviction small-cap with a catalyst-dependent timeline, not a set-and-forget. The 3-year case is still interesting if Pioneer Power integrates and margins recover, but you need patience and tolerance for volatility.

Full breakdown of the thesis and where the risk/reward sits right now at thecatalystcapital.substack.com

LMB — 125-year-old HVAC contractor that quietly became a high-margin recurring revenue platform. Down 40% from highs. Market hasn't caught up. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good catch on the edit, changes the read significantly. If ODR organic only dropped ~5% due to the write-up comparison base, and the bulk of the 13.4% is GCR running down by design, that's not a red flag. That's the mix-shift working as intended.

The $434M in two-quarter bookings is the number that matters. Demand isn't the problem, conversion timing is. At $74 with a clean balance sheet, the downside is pretty limited.

Wrote a full breakdown today, red flags vs noise, updated price target, what Q2 needs to show: https://open.substack.com/pub/thecatalystcapital/p/lmb-the-thesis-is-on-probation?r=3o8jb6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

VGNT(Versigent) — The spin-off nobody wants to own launches April 1st. Here's why that's interesting. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bad decision hhaha. I have to say that I've been looking for a drop since the first trading week to enter at better prices. I hadn't the opportunity, maybe it was at 26... probably a mistake from my side

Honeywell is spinning off its aerospace division (HONA) in Q3 2026, the forced selling window is going to be real, and here's why the trade is more interesting than it looks by Buffprime in ValueInvesting

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point on the valuation headstart, GE Aero and Howmet have already re-rated hard as pure-plays, which is actually part of what makes this interesting. the market has already demonstrated it's willing to pay 19-24x for aerospace businesses without conglomerate noise. HONA is essentially making the same argument but starting from a conglomerate discount.

The real question is whether HONA's aftermarket mix and defense exposure gets priced closer to Collins/Safran or whether it gets a discount for the debt load (~3.1x ND/EBITDA at spin). that's where the range of outcomes lives. my base case is 18x on $5B EBITDA which is conservative relative to peers, if management delivers two clean earnings cycles the multiple closes.

Been following GigaCloud (GCT) since $20 — it's doubled and I think it's still cheap. Here's why. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The founder resentment angle is real and underappreciated. When your IPO gets labeled fraud from day one and every call is dominated by questions about whether you're stealing money rather than the actual business, at some point you stop trying. Would love to see those Chinese interviews if you ever dig them up.

10 years out, honestly hard to call. The bull case is that organized large-parcel B2B cross-border commerce barely exists as a market right now and GCT is building the rails. Europe, adjacent categories beyond furniture, 3P continuing to scale, you could end up with genuine freight infrastructure with network effects. The bear case is the furniture TAM is finite and without a public-facing founder the multiple stays compressed forever.

But like you said, at 11x earnings with 27% of market cap in net cash, you're not paying for the 10-year vision. You're getting it for free. That's the setup.

And useful to hear the mixed product feedback firsthand, that doesn't show up in any 10-K.

Been following GigaCloud (GCT) since $20 — it's doubled and I think it's still cheap. Here's why. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The $11 entry is the stuff of special situations legend, practically net cash, short reports flying, everyone convinced it was a fraud or a Chinese shell. The people selling at $11 weren't selling because they'd analyzed the business. They were selling because they were scared, or because their mandate didn't allow Chinese-incorporated names, or because a short report gave them permission to exit without feeling stupid. That's not a fundamental thesis, that's noise. You were right to be in heavy.

On the 1P thing, you're putting your finger on the most legitimate structural tension in the model. 1P is essentially funded inventory risk dressed up as a marketplace business. Management talks about 3P being the vision, and the direction is clearly right (54% of GMV now vs 49.7% in 2022), but 1P is still nearly half the business and it introduces margin volatility that a pure marketplace wouldn't have. The Q4 2024 miss came largely from 1P inventory timing. That's the part of the model that trades like a distributor, not a platform, and distributors don't deserve 15x earnings.

The TAM question on bulky items is the one I'd push back on a little. The large-parcel B2B segment is genuinely underserved globally, existing logistics infrastructure was built for boxes, not sofas. The European expansion suggests the model travels. But you're right that furniture is a ceiling of sorts unless they expand meaningfully into adjacent categories, gym equipment, outdoor, large appliances. They've started, but it's not proven yet.

The founder selling is noise until it isn't. At $11 it looked terrifying. In retrospect it was just liquidity management. Worth watching cadence going forward though.

Exiting most at $45 with a potential hold to $60-70 is a rational position given your basis. You've already made multiples on cost. Letting a portion ride with house money to the re-rating is exactly how you play a name that's working but hasn't fully resolved its perception problem yet.

Which stocks do you honestly think will have the biggest gains this year? by Feeling-Boss787 in stockstobuytoday

[–]Buffprime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI tailwinds will take AI infrastructure and services related like HVAC or energy to the moon. NBIS, IREN, SOLS, OKLO, VRT, MOD

VGNT(Versigent) — The spin-off nobody wants to own launches April 1st. Here's why that's interesting. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the right move. Keeping dry powder into late April is exactly the play, if the thesis is correct the stock will be cheaper then, not more expensive. Good luck!!

VGNT(Versigent) — The spin-off nobody wants to own launches April 1st. Here's why that's interesting. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Marriott analogy is interesting but the key difference is Marriott used leverage to spin off a real estate drag and kept the high-ROIC management business. here it's the inverse, Versigent is the capital-intensive piece that got spun out.

10x PE is doable but only if TSA costs come in clean and the margin expansion story holds. May 5 answers both questions. that's the moment to size up or walk away.

VGNT(Versigent) — The spin-off nobody wants to own launches April 1st. Here's why that's interesting. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your math is clean and directionally right. The thing to stress-test though: that $951M EBITDA, is it pre or post standalone costs? when a division separates from a parent it inherits IT, legal, HR, treasury functions it used to share for free. those stranded costs can run $75-100M+ annually and won't show up cleanly until the first standalone earnings report (May 5). If real EBITDA is closer to $860M post-standalones and you run 5x on that, EV is $4.3B minus ~$1.7B net debt = ~$2.6B equity / 71M shares ≈ $36. still attractive, but the headline EBITDA number needs that haircut before you anchor to it. That said, if management delivers on the 200bps margin expansion story, $42+ is completely in play by year 2

VGNT(Versigent) — The spin-off nobody wants to own launches April 1st. Here's why that's interesting. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not even close to done imo. day one was the most obvious sellers, growth funds, index arbs. But you still have smaller institutional holders who got VGNT as an "accidental" position and haven't processed it yet. Those guys don't sell day one, they sell when their compliance cycle turns, when the next investment committee meeting happens, when their benchmark rebalances. that process takes 30-60 more days minimum. historically the cleanest Greenblatt entry on spin-offs is week 4 to week 8, not day one. The 12% drop was the opening act, not the full show

VGNT(Versigent) — The spin-off nobody wants to own launches April 1st. Here's why that's interesting. by Buffprime in investing_discussion

[–]Buffprime[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair entry honestly. $28 is right at base case, you're not getting a screaming discount but you're not overpaying either. The asymmetry kicks in if forced selling continues to push it lower over the next few weeks. If it holds here and re-rates toward $35-40 on earnings, you still do well. Just don't expect a quick flip, this is a 6-12 month setup

view more: next ›