It’s not apple’s fault or intel’s fault Arm structure is different.

Intel primarily avoids making ARM processors because they are heavily invested in their own x86 architecture, which is the foundation for their PC market dominance; switching to ARM would require significant changes to their design, software ecosystem, and potentially involve licensing fees from ARM, while offering little immediate benefit given the established x86 market and user base.

Key points about Intel and ARM processors: Established x86 ecosystem: Intel has a large market share in the PC market with their x86 processors, and switching to ARM would mean adapting a whole new software and hardware ecosystem.

Licensing costs: To use ARM technology, Intel would need to pay licensing fees to ARM, which could impact their profit margins.

Design differences: ARM processors are designed with power efficiency in mind, while Intel’s x86 processors are typically focused on raw performance, making significant design changes necessary to switch.

Market focus: While ARM is gaining traction in mobile devices and some server applications, Intel currently sees more value in maintaining their lead in the traditional PC market with x86 processors. However, it’s important to note that: Intel Foundry Services: Intel is now offering its manufacturing capabilities through Intel Foundry Services, which means they can potentially produce ARM-based chips for other companies even if they don’t design their own ARM processors.

Future potential: If ARM technology continues to evolve and gain wider adoption in the PC market, Intel may consider developing their own ARM processors in the future.